39 comments

39
Why won't they list the banks; I have yet to read anywhere the actual names involved in this.
3
https://nationalfile.com/revealed-andrew-torba-names-two-banks-who-banned-gab-after-media-smears/
35
These corporate dogs don't realize their pushing for a complete secondary system where they will have no control. There's starting up alt news, social media, movie studios, and now attempts at banks. I'm sure I'm leaving something out too.
5
Movie studios?
12
Daily Wire. Run Hide Fight and now Gina Carano's movie
4
Yea I forget what their called but there's few separate companies trying to make movies that have no connection to Hollywood corruption.
5
People who tried starting their own banks: - Ghadaffi - Saddam - JFK - Lincoln - Hitler People that own the Federal Reserve: ![](https://files.catbox.moe/6q7h2a.jpg)
3
A man in a strange hat and a woman with a deer head?
1
Rothschilds throwing an Illuminati ball in the early 70's.
2
*shrugs*
3
The fact that the people who run the banks who own your country are also involved in one world government type conspiracies, and the fact that most world leaders look sickly and fuck kids is pretty alarming if you think about it.
2
> most world leaders look sickly and fuck kids Most world leaders are old, but there’s Macron and the New Zealand PM whose name I can’t remember… As for the child pedophillia, there are only a few world leaders who could be… doing that, probably aren’t.
21
I would support this bank with my life's savings
18
Credit unions man, credit unions are the way to go.
4
Could I ask why you say so?
8
Not him but credit unions are nonprofit and community owned.
1
But they're the same thing as banks, basically?
2
As far as the serivces they provide, yes. Checking/Savings accounts, car loans, personal loans, etc.
2
Functionally they offer the same services, but structurally and hierarchically they run completely different; they effectively run as a non-profit owned partly by everyone putting money into them.
1
Sounds epic
2
Credit unions are jointly owned by all the account holders, when the credit union makes money its shares amongst the account holders and most don’t charge fees for services because if you have an account there you own a part of the bank.
21
Payment processors banned him so he took payments in bitcoin - if his 'bank' was basically a bitcoin wallet he's profited like crazy over the past few months, wouldn't surprise me if the crazy bastard managed to do it
17
"Just build your own bank" gab: OK! :)
15
I would bank with them..
14
Isn't this all going a bit too far. Should a media outlet have to buy it's own bank?
15
No, but they’ve been banned by a 4th bank, so, what choice do they have?
26
That's how bad things are currently. Want to provide people with means to say any legal speech they want? Be prepared to be blacklisted by all the major companies: hosting providers, banks, advertisers etc.
12
Count me in
10
I'd put my money in
10
That's likely a huge distraction and an overregulated racket. The people censoring speech control the processors and banking system. Find a payment processor outside of the US that takes cards and see what other people did first. Better yet, get people to start using a cryptocurrency as cash.
8
Something just occurred to me... What if this authoritarian movement happened like 5-10 years ago, as opposed to now.... Wow, we would have been *fucked*. I mean, we still are kind of fucked. But not *totally* fucked. Technologies like IPFS, crypto, alt-tech platforms like Ruqqus & Gab, none of these existed... *Shivers*
8
The more they push the more we'll adapt.
7
And they have a long long way to fall. Why would anyone bother banking with traditional finance if the payment processor might yank your merchant account because a user said something they didn’t like?
1
There is no "if". They do that. It's not a hypothetical.
8
I joked about this the other week when I was reading an article saying he'd been declined from multiple banks. I remember saying "knowing him, he'll build his own". I was half joking but half serious due to knowing his mantra of building his own stuff etc. Good for him anyway the fucking mad lad...
6
For all the scepticism and criticism around Gab and Torba (especially given the recent data leak), I can have a great amount of respect for a man whose principle is literally "If they ban us, we'll build our own service" - especially given that he relies a fair bit on open-source. No website that caters to his views, so he creates one (using Mastodon source code, then altered). YouTube is unwelcoming, so he creates Gab TV (worse, but an alternative). He decides he wants a global comment feature, so he builds Dissenter browser (forking Brave's open-source code; outdated version, but fills a niche). Web servers refuse to host him, so (to my knowledge) he becomes self-hosted. Banks decline him, so he allows cryptocurrencies and sees about getting his own bank. It's all very impressive, and it makes me want to throw my money at him.
5
Surely they should have looked into this after the 2nd or 3rd ban?
5
Banking is ripe for real disruption. Our whole system is mired in tradition and fear of change. Buy a bank and offer account holders an API like some of the Euro banks do now. The people who need that will flock to you.
3
Try pocketnet.