7 comments

11
This is not a bad idea. Women on the internet should be protected. When they read something, that something should be soothing to the weaker sex's easily offended sensibilities. Treat women like children and they can cope. We should take it a step further and make the woman's vote virtual so that when women vote computers can see to it that vote is cancelled out automatically. And when women speak, there should be a great filter so that everything they say is censored or made appealing. Women might not know their place, but the computer knows what is what and can correct it at light speed.
4
I laughed and agree that women are different, but it's shit like this that gives feminazis ammunition and justification
4
Feminism hurts women and girls first and most. Feminism getting its way wrecks females. Self destruction is their purpose, they need no ammunition or justification. Everything wrong with the modern world; censorship, feminized boys made into eunuchs, men competing in girls' sports, a plague of single mothers on welfare creating a generation of soulless, cold blooded killers... that's feminism manifesting in the real world.
9
**Laughs in Vivaldi and Librewolf**
3
I'm only still using firefox for my college stuffs, and because I haven't had the time to invest in fully switching over to another browser setup yet.
2
*shrugs* I shouldn’t think too much resources were used building that extension.
1
To play devil's advocate, if there should be any form of "censorship" on the net in my opinion, it should be through features like these rather than the heavy handed nature of deplatforming. Most sites will give you a way to block or mute an individual you don't want to hear from, I don't really have an issue with that concept being extended to allowing users to curate what language they see. I'd never install an addon or enable a feature like this, but I have no problem with that feature being made available to those individuals who want it. I also wouldn't really call this censorship either unless you also consider someone being able to block, mute or ignore another person censorship. One could argue ad block is censorship too by that logic. All this addon does is give the individual a way to change what they see or don't see. It doesn't affect my browsing experience at all unless I go out of my way to install the addon. I find this much less offensive than the "Block Dangerous or Deceptive content" option which is enabled by default, but even that I don't care that much about since it's very easy to disable that. No doubt, this is a stupid extension and it seems fitting it was released during Woman's History Month, but of the legitimate criticisms that can be thrown at Firefox or Mozilla, I don't know that this would even be on my list.