28 comments

27
Hey, it takes a lot of resources to make sure every conservative opinion is censored and the user banned. You can't expect them to do both that AND keep child porn at bay. Especially when they have a subreddit with users that post it on purpose.
12
Weren't there some people here a few days ago whining about reddit potentially banning porn? I don't care, if it takes banning it site wide to stop CP then great. It would also affect AHS since they love spamming subreddits they hate with it.
-10
This wasn't really CP though, she was 16. You guys have the IQ of a napkin.
0
Oh so she was, probably, legal? Meh.
7
Thats's CP
0
You know for a fact that you're purposefully using the term CP to make people think it's some toddler getting raped. It's some 16 year old whore sending her own nudes. Nice room temp IQ fag
4
Doesn't matter, still needs to be treated the same by site admins.
4
Reddit is a US company so 16 is CP.
0
Yeah, we all get that it's "underage", she's not a child though, and you know it's not the same as ACTUAL CP with unwilling participants. But Ruqqus likes to pretend the millisecond you turn 18 your body instantly undergoes a physical metamorphosis.
1
Cope more coomer
1
đź‘€
11
What with that stock image? Is that suppose to be a women crying over child porn or a child laying in bed with a branch?
9
Mayhap thus be yon death knell, chaps?
5
might have worked like 10 years ago. These days, child porn is apparently cool.
4
> the only good commie ![](https://media.giphy.com/media/lszAB3TzFtRaU/100w.gif)
3
She was 16, not a child, and a whore. No tears from me.
1
![](https://media.giphy.com/media/68Wf1xdBiUYY8/100w.gif)
3
Do it!
3
If it was taken down then how is spez supposed to get off?
3
Surely he keeps a few little boys in the basement. Gotta get that adrenochrome from somewhere.
2
I clicked that link and my phone antivirus told me to gtfo LMAO
3
antiviruses are a scam you really don't need one
2
She doesn't give a fuck about pedophilia, she's just covering her own ass like all women. Of course the headline makes her out to be some saint fighting for the good of humanity...
1
karen's just mad her ex bf released stuff in revenge, Reddit's probably not really at fault here > the social network reportedly dragged its feet in taking them down. She said sometimes they waited “several days” to look through the questionable content. She probably looked like an adult so they weren't sure if they should take it down or not, and the fault is of the person who posted it - it's the same issue of how much platforms should be responsible for what users post or not, it creates moderation issues to be too heavy against the platforms (but if you absolutely want to make sure nothing gets through, then there will have to be a trade off of lots more regulation of posting - it's unfortunate but probably there will have to be tolerance of that evil content just like if we give more freedom to buy guns, then bad people get guns - you can either have strict policies and laws and less freedom, or more freedom risking more worse issues) > Children aged from 10 to 14 constitute over a third of child porn consumers. I take fault with the ambiguous use of the world "child". Roughly 10 and up is an adolescent, that's different from a child. By this stat they probably mean that they send pictures to each other of themselves, so again that's a little different from them just seeing some kind of media with like 5 year olds, for example (it would be absurd to consider them to be "pedophiles" if they are attracted to people around their age who are underage "children", which would be normal).
4
They are intentionally using skewed language. Few days ago they called a 16-year old teenager "a baby". She was closer to being an adult than a fucking baby.
2
I looked through about half of the lawsuit, and it seemed rather flimsy. It focused on a lot of stuff like "greed" as it that's evil, and has several unrealistic expectations around verifying user's age, and forcing users to jump through hoops. I hate Reddit as much as anyone else, and I've seen some far more convincing arguments that Reddit allows/enables CP, but the lawsuit I looked at wasn't one of them.
2
The greed stuff is intended to establish that Reddit willfully profits off of the exchange of CP on its platform. Whether or not it succeeds in making that argument remains to be seen.
1
It does try to establish that connection later, correct. However it's like like starting an argument with "you're racist" before then proving someone is verbally abusive. They're two different subjects.