r/WhitePeopleTwitter Fascist Moderators

17    08 Nov 2023 16:02 by u/HackerJunk2

OP: "Why are Republicans OBSESSED with women's bodies" My banned response: "Fixed it: Why are are Republicans obsessed with saving human lives" OP link: https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/s/08BGx1qpiK r/WhitePeopleTwitter is a super Left echo chamber that censors all others. I was immediately permanently banned for such a mild response?!? Some Reddit moderators are out of control! Ironically, the moderator called me a fascist as they ban people that don't have the same view as they do. Their action is a perfect example of fascism.

32 comments

3 u/omnikey 09 Nov 2023 10:37
Literally a racist sub
2 u/CensorDeezNuts23 11 Nov 2023 07:39
That sub is batshit crazy and so detached from reality
1 u/revddit 08 Nov 2023 16:02
Another option for reviewing removed content is your ***Rev***eddit [user page](https://www.reveddit.com/y/H!a!c!k!e!r!J!u!n!k!2?all=true). The [real-time extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/direct/) alerts you when a moderator removes your content, and the [linker extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/linker) provides [buttons](https://i.imgur.com/0BAImPq.png) for viewing removed content. There's also a [shortcut for iOS](https://www.icloud.com/shortcuts/62bc7570613c42cb8b851fad264136df). The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to remove this comment. This bot only operates in authorized subreddits. To support this tool, [post it on your profile](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) and select ['pin to profile'](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png).   [^(F.A.Q.)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/f.a.q./) ^| [^(v/reveddit)](https://www.reveddit.com/v/reveddit/-redirect) ^| [^(support me)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/donate) ^| [^(share)](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) ^& [^('pin to profile')](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png)
1 u/FunkyTown313 † 08 Nov 2023 16:04
I wouldn't have banned you, but you are an idiot
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] † 08 Nov 2023 22:48
I appreciate the first part. Tip: Don't call people names. It cheapens your response. Truly, I'm not trying to be a jerk, just a tip. 👍
1 u/FunkyTown313 † 08 Nov 2023 23:00
I just call it like I see it.
1 u/CensorDeezNuts23 11 Nov 2023 07:40
And you’re a prick 🤷
1 u/HorseSteroids 09 Nov 2023 12:01
It is strange that the killing of the unborn in the womb is seen as the moral high ground these days.
2 u/I_Said_I_Say 10 Nov 2023 05:59
As opposed to what and/or when?
1 u/easeMachine 10 Feb 2024 23:02
As opposed to not killing the unborn in the womb as the moral high ground, which it certainly is. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10297561/ > From 1776 until the mid-1800s abortion was viewed as socially unacceptable; however, abortions were not illegal in most states. During the 1860s a number of states passed anti-abortion laws. Most of these laws were ambiguous and difficult to enforce. After 1860 stronger anti-abortion laws were passed and these laws were more vigorously enforced.
1 u/I_Said_I_Say 14 Feb 2024 02:19
I'm sorry, I don't understand your point. Abortion was once illegal? Your source, from 1979, only talks about outdated abortion practices from hundreds of years ago, and only really specific to America. There's no argument for morality at all.
1 u/easeMachine 14 Feb 2024 16:10
> **From 1776 until the mid-1800s abortion was viewed as socially unacceptable**
1 u/I_Said_I_Say 14 Feb 2024 20:24
In the 1700s the scientific and religious communities (not entirely separate) widely believed in the concept of "preformation," which stated, essentially, that all species had been made by God at the time of Creation, and animals "growing" was simply the unfolding of preformed parts. In the late 1800s Americans popularly believed that "rain follows the plow," the idea that farming a particular plot of land made it more likely for it to rain in that area. I still don't understand your point. Perhaps if you constructed some kind of argument involving the morality for or against abortion there would be more to address.
1 u/Nederlander1 09 Nov 2023 20:02
Shocking, a far left sub with far left mods don’t like dissenting opinion. Who would’ve guessed lmao
-4 u/I_Said_I_Say 08 Nov 2023 20:27
"Republicans obsessed with saving human lives" is one of the stupidest takes ever. The Republican party consistently vote against things that would save human lives, issues like gun control and health care for example. Also, you seem to fundamentally misunderstand what fascism is. When viewed through the lens of a rational critique of politics, the broad consensus is that fascism is a right-wing position. Having said that, a permanent ban does seem a little heavy handed.
-1 u/CTU 08 Nov 2023 21:35
Disagree with gun control as more lives are saved with guns then are lost from them. As for health care that is a tough challenge to deal with and there is no one right answer for it as each way of dealing with it has its own problems.
3 u/I_Said_I_Say 08 Nov 2023 23:55
Gun control which creates greater restrictions on who can get a gun, and what type of gun can absolutely save lives. Also, the idea that guns keep people safe is just plain wrong. Studies have repeatedly shown that people who own guns are actually at an increased risk of homicide. [Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor for Homicide in the Home - Arthur L. Kellermann et al. ](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199310073291506) Conclusion: Rather than confer protection, guns kept in the home are associated with an increase in the risk of homicide by a family member or intimate acquaintance. [Homicide and suicide risks associated with firearms in the home: A national case-control study - Douglas J. Wiebe](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196064403002567) Conclusion: Having a gun at home is a risk factor for adults to be shot fatally (gun homicide) or commit suicide with a firearm. As for healthcare, pretty much every developed nation in the world does a much better job of it than America. The major reason for this is obstruction by the GOP in response to corporate lobbying. Healthcare would be simple if they were obsessed with saving human lives.
2 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 08 Nov 2023 22:23
I appreciate your last sentence..the purpose of my post is not to discuss abortion, but to point out that reddit moderators ARE censoring people that have opposing views. That should not be allowed. Read the moderators response calling me a fascist while they are using their own power to censor The moderator is acting as a dictator controlling opposition. With one button push, silenced. The word "fascist" itself is thrown around by those in actual power to silence others. It is well known that Reddit leans heavily Left and many on the right give examples of censorship. I've been banned many times for giving my honest thought. I do not call people names or ridicule or hate. The irony that I point out is that the moderator did all those things against me just because they have a different opinion. There needs to be a way to report a moderator and have an impartial group review those reports. The moderators have too much power and wield it with impunity. From Mirriam-Webster definition of fascism: 1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition 2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
1 u/I_Said_I_Say 09 Nov 2023 00:11
What do you mean moderators have too much power? They have control over their space, nothing more. If someone was in my home spouting off racist bigoted nonsense I would be well within my rights to kick them out. That's not censorship or an abuse of power. The same can be said for a subreddit. You are not owed a platform on someone else's space. If you take issue with that then your recourse is to start your own subreddit and run it any way you choose. It's probably worth pointing out that making abortion illegal amounts to state enforced pregnancy and that fits your definition of fascism much better than your example with the mod. I can't speak for that mod but I imagine what they are referring to is your apparent support of that particular fascist viewpoint.
1 u/Kryptosis 09 Nov 2023 02:05
Nailed it. It’s wild how people can misconstrue how subreddits work then rant about free speech and fascism as if a government is involved. In your apt analogy Op is now going to the neighbors house to complain about having the door shut on them elsewhere.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 29 Nov 2023 23:44
Except subreddits are PUBLIC. House argument is a false analogy.
1 u/Kryptosis 29 Nov 2023 23:48
They are not “public”. They are run by private individuals (mods) who are allowed to set their own rules as deemed valid by the admins, employed by Reddit.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 02:38
Inside your car is private, but yet it is still legal for me to record you in your car because you are in public. The subreddit was and is open to the public with rules for which I joined and did not break any of those rules. Authoritarianism is probably the best description. It's always the party that is doing the Censorship that thinks it is not censoring. People feel a false sense of moral superiority such that they don't think the rules apply to them.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 02:39
"private individuals" run everything, including the government.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 02:41
With your analogy, a store could kick someone out just because they didn't like their viewpoint or the way they look.
1 u/Kryptosis 30 Nov 2023 15:38
Stores DO reserve the right to refuse service lol… The only reason they can’t ban someone is due to legally-protected discrimination. You gotta figure out what private and public spaces actually means.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 16:17
So, according to you, if a person walks into a store with a Minnesota Vikings shirt, they can refuse them service because they don't like the Vikings. Football is not a protected group
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 16:25
Actually, football might be considered a religion. LOL
1 u/Kryptosis 30 Nov 2023 16:43
As silly as it sounds that is true and legal. The business is shooting itself in the foot by reducing not getting paid but they’re free to ban. Go ahead and look it up instead of asking me to convince you.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 16:20
So, if the moderator banned you right now for something you said during our above conversation, you would be, "I'm ok with it. The moderator can ban me at any moment just because they want to." Gotcha!
1 u/Kryptosis 30 Nov 2023 16:41
Yup! Then I’d make my own half-assed censorship sub and wait for everyone who got banned for bullshit from this one to join. That’s how Reddit works.
1 u/HackerJunk2 [OP] 30 Nov 2023 20:19
The key difference is in the real world, the stores donot do it. reddit moderators do. What use is Community Guidelines if they are ignored? A society without rules is doomed. A reddit sub echo chamber of hate is not good for society. Since reddit is VERY liberal, conservative echo chambers are banned while the liberal ones are left open. I think left and right should be allowed free speech. You should be standing up for all. One day you will be on the other end.