Tiz whatiz

35    13 Feb 2024 03:34 by u/TheCowpoker406

247 comments

15
lmfao u made some reddit mod cry lol. nice! reddit is full of pussies who are free to troll.
11
I wasn't even attempting to troll, just laying out the facts of the matter. Their tears are just a bonus.
3
i know i'm just saying it's soo much fun and so free to get under peoples skin because they live in their echo chamber censor chamber
3
Agreed, it is in fact hilarious, but also terrifying. With everyone so divided, I worry society isn't gonna last much longer.
-2
it wasn't going to anyways the next few generations will bring about the plot to idiocracy lmfao. i am ready to watch everyone get a cold taste of reality. stupid people bring about hard times.
2
The plot of Idiocracy had manifested prior to the films conception. But it is a crying shame to see it unravel so much quicker than the writers could have ever predicted.
5
Even fox News got it right, pull it together
1
What facts of the matter are there? I haven’t read anything that said she was a man.
-4
Because she never was. It's just regular conservative h8.
-3
[Whoops!](https://thepostmillennial.com/houston-police-ran-investigation-to-determine-preferred-pronouns-of-lakewood-church-shooter)
5
That pretty explicitly says she’s a woman.
3
Point is, like the Nashville Christian school shooter, as soon as the media/reddit found out they were on their team, the story was swept out of headlines within days, as evident by the outrage of the leaked manifesto as well as OPs post here.
3
What story was swept out of the headlines though? That she’s a woman?
3
https://youtu.be/Xr2E8Dn19uk?si=uaFSZhK6TRii1ZiY Skip to 3:25 if you're unwilling to watch the video More coverage https://youtu.be/L29WxXQJCSk?si=cvgbAL3jtUGx1vhW That's just from Nashville, story was dead within 10 days. Uvalde? Sandy Hook? Those were practically month long headlines you couldn't avoid, and are memorialized on a yearly basis. Just saying
1
But that’s the Nashville shooting. I’m talking about this shooting. You can’t point to *this* shooting as an example of a compelling point and then not explain how it fits your narrative.
-2
Shooter used pronouns ✅ Shooter targeted Christians ✅ Shooter found to have hate speech documented ✅ Shooter used weapons they probably bent over backwards advocating against a week prior ✅ Shooter had "Free Palestine" written on weapon ✅ RemindMe! 7 days It'll be forgotten
1
I will be messaging you in 7 days on [**2024-02-20 13:17:35 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-02-20%2013:17:35%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/comments/1apjps5/tiz_whatiz/kq88e62/?context=3) [**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FRedditCensors%2Fcomments%2F1apjps5%2Ftiz_whatiz%2Fkq88e62%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-02-20%2013%3A17%3A35%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201apjps5) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
2
What of this has been swept under the rug though? These are all known facts (“probably” aside lol).
2
Is this the snowflake "copium" they speak of? Do you even realize how many pronouns you just used? Do we need to be worried about you? And you think they were against guns but then see guns as the solution to whatever issues she had against that church? Sure bro, keep believing that only the right has people with guns
1
How you concluded any of that from my comments is wild lmao
2
I concluded it by hearing about the event this weekend, and apparently that was far more up-to-date and accurate information than you came across
1
So what am I missing here according to you
1
Everyone has pronouns you moron it came free with your basic speech
1
"they"? "It'll"? "Me"? You radical leftist, using pronouns all over like that!!!
1
Alright, we’re back. What sort of conspiratorial bullshit do you have now? Or did you come to realize you’re full of shit?
1
What conspiracy? Check any news outlet, what happened? Mind boggling you lack the self awareness to see the bigger picture here lmfao r/redditmoment
1
Here's a sneak peek of /r/redditmoment using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/redditmoment/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [Just like the Anime!](https://i.redd.it/kw327lykdxmb1.png) | [408 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/redditmoment/comments/16cvfdn/just_like_the_anime/) \#2: [Referring to licenses to have children](https://i.redd.it/5d9cm7jleu0c1.jpg) | [495 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/redditmoment/comments/17x7se3/referring_to_licenses_to_have_children/) \#3: [Wtf](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/15iwils) | [1465 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/redditmoment/comments/15iwils/wtf/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
1
You are a bigot. Just saying
1
Average redditor response
2
Facts aren't hate. Check his DNA. He's a dude. To pretend anything else is foolish and a lie.
5
Please present these facts. Credible sources only.
2
Not trans but not a republican [here](https://abc7chicago.com/lakewood-church-shooting-shooter-houston-joel-osteen-megachurch/14415008/)
1
[deleted]
1
Where does it say anything about party affiliation? She hated jews and loved guns, sounds pretty conservative to me.
1
Pro palestine is a far left position.
2
Oh, so you've seen the DNA results? Because that "dude" has been pregnant.
1
5/7
1
It was a mentally ill man with a multitude of aliases and genders over the years that believed that he gave physical birth to the child that is in critical condition. He had "free Palestine" on his rifle, and targeted his family's church that did not agree with his lifestyle. These are the facts.
2
"In a press conference later on Monday, police officials noted that, although the shooter appeared to utilize both male and female names, they found no indication that she ever identified as anything but a cisgender woman"
1
So .. her family is lying and HPD is competent? Get outa here with that.
2
You're absolutely ridiculous
1
Just another idiot that can’t accept reality. She’s always been a she.
1
Or she's just poor and utilizes aliases
1
Her.
-2
I dont care. It's a man who has mental conditions and pushed his/her way to get hormone therapy and a few different places in their breakdown. It's not transphobic to say someone is a mental case that uses different drugs as a means to feel more themselves.this persons was an aimless deranged man that tried to be a woman. Trans activists should be pissed that crazy people have people latching ineto their very legitimate cause.
1
Do you have any proof of this or are you really just so hellbent on this narrative that you'll continuously keep denying all factual evidence to the contrary?
1
And yet this is about as transphobic a post as one can make. Please, go on some more... /popcorn
1
tRaNsPhObIC lol stfu
1
Name checks out.
1
Ah yes. Hormone therapy allows a man to give birth.
1
No this was an actual woman who gave live birth It isn't a man and never was
1
No.
1
You're wrong dude. You read something about how she uses male aliases sometimes. You don't know what an alias is or why someone would use one and cobfused it with transgenderism
1
You're wrong. This person is well known in Conroe for a variety of mental crises and obscene actions. Genetically male. Clinically insane. Nothing homophobic.
1
OK so the police are wrong then?
1
The police are being politically correct, as always, when a hot button issue of a shooting, a current geopolitical hot button, and media bylaws converge. Not sure why it's hard to understand a CYA situation in press briefings.
1
No, the police have said verbatim that this person was born a woman and that the child is her bio son. Better let them know
1
Fox news always refers to trans people by their PC pronouns, this is nothing new.
1
Aged. Like. Milk. You homophobic coward.
1
Trans MtF
-2
Romans 1:24-25 / 1:28-31
4
It's not even a fact you dumbass
3
What isn’t a fact?
5
She’s a woman, not a man.
6
Wrong, she’s a goner
5
I mean she dead for sure, but a dead woman. Not a dead man.
-3
Probably a man given they are far more likely to commit this type of crime. And if "trans" obviously mentally ill.
2
But not actually trans, so no if there.
1
But definitely *not* a man, and definitely *not* transgender. Can we entertain all untrue hypotheticals please? What if she could fly? What if she was Jeff Bezos’ dominatrix?
2
But your "fact" is incorrect.
1
[removed]
5
Are you a super trans supporter or something trying to gender this lady as a male or something? Seems like she was a criminal and biological female that had a child, so why is everyone trying to claim she was trans?
1
[removed]
4
Not everyone, just the OP and his alt account.
1
Shoes sometimes
2
They're both deleted so 100000% alts it's fucking pathetic
1
It's 14 hours later and this still has not be established as 'fact.' So far it's conservative pundits speculating and news organizations reporting on that speculation and and "we don't really know" from the law enforcement on the ground. You were banned for being an edgelord XD
1
You're wrong though does that affect you at all or is this performative stupidity
1
The facts are you don't get to choose what the world calls you.
8
Was she a male? I haven’t heard anything about that.
3
Nah, but that's the conservative take. If a woman does some heinous crime they must have been trans.
-3
Definitely seems like some off the wall right-wing nut job shit.
-3
They love to chortle about their hate.
4
Eh.. I've been more hated by the left than the right but I suppose everyone's interactions are different =)
1
Same here. You have to go with the narrative completely at all times and when you don't you get canceled. There is a littany of examples. Now the biggest reason for this is because the narrative is constantly changing. The over %80 of people in the middle are sick of it. So they jump to the side that won't call them a nazi because there's one small thing they happen to not agree on. There's a reason the left can't meme and that npc meme became a thing. If so many didn't see a ringing of truth to it, it wouldn't still be a thing.
2
This is objectively false, mind you. I’m far left, and disagree plenty with left wingers in America. Who’s going to cancel me?
1
The people on the left who “cancel” their own are just canceling the pick-mes with dogshit takes. Of course there’s the far far left extremists where if you don’t agree with them then they become intolerable asshats, but their just clowns, and I’ve ever met maybe 2 people like that irl. Most online people that are that radicalized are grifters.
3
You just explained all the maga cult jerk offs.
1
Only one canceled here was OP for his blatant homophobia.
1
Thanks for proving my point. What op did is not homophobia. It's factual info that the news won't allow to exist in the narrative. Like the many trans mass shooters that happened in the last 30 days no one even knows about. But we must be homophobes because we are aware of them. The %80 of people in the political center are sick of that. And you.
2
Trust me, guy, you don’t align with 80% of anybody. This has got to be one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read.
1
The last ban I got was for saying we shouldn't waste resources on accused and convicted pdf files. Reddit considers them a protected class and I used hate speech. Maybe %80 of redditors. But I'm glad then. %80 of people that don't have shit for brains...
1
I’m nearly positive you meant pedophiles, and no, Reddit doesn’t consider them a protected class. They do forbid the advocation of violence or harm on someone though, even pedophiles. That’s not to say you didn’t run up on some power tripping mod. I got banned from a circlejerk sub for trolling - can’t even make that shit up. But that’s not even *close* to what I was talking about in my original reply. The idea that this was a trans shooter and it’s being suppressed by the media is the highest order of idiocy. Or this made up idea that there have been uncounted, secret mass shootings by trans people over the past 30 days. Pure drooling moron status. Or that you’re a homophobe just because you have convinced yourself that this unsubstantiated, unverifiable fable is true. Optimistically, that’s indicative of mental illness.
1
From someone in the middle who eschews both parties, I assure you that you're a bigot.
1
You're still proving my point. Pointing out someone is a trans person is phobia now. That's all that happened. That's all they did. But simply knowing that and spreading the counter narrative because the news won't, makes us a bigot. If you were as center on the political compass as everyone else, you'd be like us and say fuck off, I guess we're bigots now then. Instead you're oh so worried about what being labeled an ista phobe even tho you are the 1st to do it yourself. Like a child.
1
I'll try. Fuck off. The shooter was not trans. You are not center but fringe. Far right fringe.
1
This person is not, and was not, trans. They cannot *know* something that is not true.
3
Growing up in the Deep South, I literally *couldn’t* be hated more by liberals. There’s no hate quite like Christian love.
1
Just dropping in to commiserate with OP's homophobia then?
2
More like to laugh at it? Why would I feel sympathetic towards someone’s learned hate? I see now that I mistyped my previous comment - I couldn’t be hated more by *conservatives*. I’ve been called “rave traitor” more times than I care to count.
2
Well this whole thread is about nutjobs spreading demonstrative lies, but who knows, that may not be why leftists hate you. ;)
1
They hate me because I'm apart of their curtain of the oppressed but I go against their ideologies.
2
You do you boo.
2
As to you. Thank you for being civil.
1
Can verify with 100% accuracy that this is not why leftists hate you.
1
You're entitled to that opinion.
1
So long as you realize that’s all yours is as well.
1
I've experienced though? You're just blatantly lying to me, who has experienced it.
1
Yes, you have opinions on how others feel about you and why. You’re not them, and it’s just your perception of the situation. And your opinions and perceptions are totally valid, let’s not forget that. But they’re not objective. Surely you can see that. Now if you were to just say, “they hate me because I go against their ideologies”, then…of course? Conservatives hate me for the same reason. But, while I’ve had *plenty* call me “race traitor” and other madness, I don’t claim that’s why conservatives hate me.
-2
The person was trans, they switched back and forth between male and female. That’s listed in every news article. The police have now chosen to identify her as a woman but I don’t know that anyone knows what the person was born as
3
"In a press conference later on Monday, police officials noted that, although the shooter appeared to utilize both male and female names, they found no indication that she ever identified as anything but a cisgender woman"
1
That’s not in the three articles I read. Only that they were identifying her as a woman, though they knew she had many aliases including male names.
3
Wow a whole 3 articles
1
Yes. Most people read one. I went and checked 3. You’re simply wrong that this is clear evidence, you saw it in one article and now everyone is required to know what you saw?
3
You're the one whose wrong, you read 3 articles and think everyone is required to know what you saw as fact?
1
I don’t think you understand how reality works. You found a single article that confirmed your bias, and to you that is the unquestionable truth. You stated that multiple news outlets confirmed what you said, however none I found said what you say they said. This indicates that, most likely, your source sucks. Newsweek, ABC13 and Click2Houston (which are all very reputable) do not say what you claim, so in the end it is you who is incorrect.
1
[removed]
1
You lost at Newsweek.
4
Newsweek isn't reputable, lmao.
1
Skip the other two, only respond to one. That’s credible.
2
Did they out the shooter as trans like you stated because that's a pretty serious allegation? Yeah, I didn't think so.
1
I wonder, do you still hold to your claim that this was a transgender woman? And how do you feel about female authors using male pen names?
1
>The person was trans, they switched back and forth between male and female. That’s listed in every news article. Can't keep your lies straight.
12
police have already confirmed she was indeed a biological woman
4
Now that I have heard. Gotta wonder where these geniuses get their news.
2
It's called making shit up to push their outdated beliefs
1
News reports initially said she went by multiple names, both male and female. Now they say that and add that police have chosen to now identify the shooter as a Hispanic female. It wasn’t made up, they just didn’t see the additional update
3
I’d say if you see “uses male and female aliases” and jump to “trans”, “making it up” is exactly what you’re doing.
1
The person regularly identified as both a man and a woman. If that is not the textbook definition of transgender, there is no definition.
4
That definitely isn’t the definition of transgender, but that’s neither here nor there. The person did not regularly identify as both a man and a woman. They used a male alias, which isn’t nearly the same thing. Are female writers using male pen names all transgender?
1
Can’t argue with that logic.
3
That's not the case though, she didn't "identify" as both a man and woman she used male and female names as aliases. I say this as a Christian conservative that transgenderism and being a habitual criminal with schizophrenia who uses both male and female aliases just aren't the same thing.
1
People use aliases to scam the same businesses multiple times
1
Yeah, its looking like she was also committing fraud as well, which explains a lot of things (and makes sense how she passed the background check when she shouldn't have).
3
she literally had her own child like how are people lying about this
1
Transphobia. The more mass shooters who are queer means more queer people are automatically bad guys I guess
1
A biological woman who used male names, hence the confusion
2
TLDR: It doesn't look so, she was just committing fraud. What caused this is that she has been using multiple names/alias including male names in official documents. If confirmation is wanted a review of her medical records would rule it out, but it currently looks like she may have been committing fraud as well leading up to this. Her drivers license has her listed as "female" though a autopsy report hasn't been released stating biology of her. This has resulted in a lot of misreporting and many news agency's to use this as a way to attack other news agency stating they are lying. Likewise some places are trying to use this to paint the person as transgender for their own motivates as well. The reality is it is being sorted out as things are being found amongst her possessions, but it looks like she has committed some extensive amounts of fraud for some time.
8
Op got banned for being transphobic probably lmao. Cry me a river
5
People are also saying she literally gave birth so OP is just deranged
2
Nope, they are transphobic as well.
1
He has 406 in his name, assuming it’s Montana I’m not surprised. Place is full of people like that.
5
She wasn't trans though. You're just being stupid and wrong. Mods are 100% correct to ban misinformation.
4
Nothing like swift and aggressive censorship and bans to convince people you're right about something.
5
Which is wild, given how wrong he is.
4
wow you got banned for spreading false info? shocking
1
Another option for reviewing removed content is your ***Rev***eddit [user page](https://www.reveddit.com/y/1!7!D!e!a!d!F!l!a!m!i!n!g!o!s?all=true). The [real-time extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/direct/) alerts you when a moderator removes your content, and the [linker extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/linker) provides [buttons](https://i.imgur.com/0BAImPq.png) for viewing removed content. There's also a [shortcut for iOS](https://www.icloud.com/shortcuts/62bc7570613c42cb8b851fad264136df). The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to remove this comment. This bot only operates in authorized subreddits. To support this tool, [post it on your profile](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) and select ['pin to profile'](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png).   [^(F.A.Q.)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/f.a.q./) ^| [^(v/reveddit)](https://www.reveddit.com/v/reveddit/-redirect) ^| [^(support me)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/donate) ^| [^(share)](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) ^& [^('pin to profile')](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png)
1
The person was trans though. That’s not in question. Apparently they were born female but had several male identities as well
1
She really wasnt trans, police have confirmed it, having an alias doesn't make you trans?? If that was true then anyone whos ever used a fake name is also trans. sorry facts dont care about your feelings
1
If the person regularly identified as a man, that is a trans person. Are you saying that they have a certain set of actions to take before they’re “qualified” as trans?
1
No it's just clear conservatives are desperate to label her trans to push their own agenda regardless of what multiple news and statements have confirmed
2
That is in question cause it's not fucking true, watch something other than newsmax for 5 goddamn seconds you cretin
1
ABC, CBS and Newsweek. Those are the actual sources. You can’t discredit reality because you don’t like it
3
All have said that she is NOT trans but ok!
1
Not one of them said that. All three say that they had multiple identities, and that police have chosen to refer to her as a woman
2
Having multiple aliases doesn't make you trans you room temperature IQ weirdo
2
Interesting. What are the qualifications to being trans? What’s the checklist? Most would say that regularly identifying as the opposite gender would be all that’s needed, but you clearly know more. Have you published your research and minimum qualifications for being certified as trans? Many would be interested to know, I’m sure.
2
It must be so hard having your two brain cells constantly fighting for third place huh
1
No, no, we want to hear from you! What qualifies someone as trans? You clearly have a list, let’s hear it!
3
Having multiple aliases to commit fraud doesn't make someone trans.
3
*attention citizen. Dissenting opinion detected. Elimination protocols engaged.*
-4
Not even an opinion, just an inconvenient fact.
8
She has a biological child who was injured in the shooting, she was cisgender.
-6
A male can also have a biological child... the initial reports I read specifically said they were trans but in all fairness the story was still developing so I'll check again in the morning.
11
The father is in jail for a sexual offense
3
Gee what sort of sources put that out? /boggle
3
What's it like being the dumbest motherfucker in every room you've ever stood in?
-3
You tell us.
1
Yeah just push that bs before you know cause it matches your beliefs. Classic.
1
You are incredibly gullible and easily swayed by made-up bullshit as long as it fits your worldview. Try and learn to not believe everything you read on the internet next time.
1
Do you know what cisgender means? Lmao
1
bro you’re coping so hard just accept you’re wrong
-3
No, he's just a dude.
3
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13074137/amp/Harrowing-video-shows-worshippers-fleeing-Joel-Osteens-small-kids-two-duty-cops-battle-female-shooter-opened-fire-congregation.html The father’s Enrique Carranza, in prison in Florida. This article also has photos of this woman as a woman going back to her mugshot in 2000, so if she is trans, she did so a very long time ago.
2
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot). Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13074137/Harrowing-video-shows-worshippers-fleeing-Joel-Osteens-small-kids-two-duty-cops-battle-female-shooter-opened-fire-congregation.html](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13074137/Harrowing-video-shows-worshippers-fleeing-Joel-Osteens-small-kids-two-duty-cops-battle-female-shooter-opened-fire-congregation.html)** ***** ^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
3
It's not an opinion you dumb fuck
1
Calm your horses
2
Stop spreading lies that hurt people.
1
Who's being hurt? Also the guy shouldn't have been banned lol.
3
She was a she transitioning to male. Allegedly. They haven't even proved she trans. You whole ass got banned for no damn reason because you just wanted to be hateful. Lmfao.
2
OP is literally just making shit up. You guys are so gullible.
2
Gee, why would r/news mute me for pushing made-up shit? It must be censorship
1
The whole of biology and billions of years of evolution hand-waved as made up shit. You are a mindless individual. Stupid beyond measure. Your insanity is on the way out.
2
You got banned because you were straight up spreading BS lmao. You deserved to be muted.
1
The funny thing is that these weirdo trans activists usually agree that female is a biological term meaning someone with a vagina, and that a woman is the gender that can change. According to the mods logic, the person that was shot was male.
1
That was trans logic 5 years ago, but these days I see more and more people taking the extra leap to suggest that biological sex in itself is a social construct because to call a person biologically male or female when they identify as the opposite gender undermines the legitimacy of their identity or some stupid shit.
2
I never met or heard someone say biological sex is a social construct. Made up scenarios in your head aren't reality.
7
really weird since its been confirmed shes not trans
1
The police report identified him as a female.
5
They also confirmed SHE is biological FEMALE you walnut
1
Just looked into it a little more. I only saw the news report a few hours after it happened. She or he or ze or whatever was using male names as aliases. Walnut is an interesting one. I guess we'll both see in a few days when more information comes out.
3
It's weird how you care more if the woman was trans (she isnt) than her shooting her own child in a tax free mega church run by a "pastor" who refused to house people fleeing from an active hurricane
1
God you're a cunt huh
1
Chiiiill
3
The aliases were for committing fraud.
2
She literally gave birth to her own child you’re fucking braindead
1
You’re sticking on the wrong issue there. I think there’s a bigger issue at hand if you dig a little deeper.
3
They aren't even right about the issue the person in question was ftm and biologically female.
2
Yeah, I know - that’s still not quite the issue I see.
1
Yeah they're gullible and lack the ability to fact check.
1
Mmmm, that’s true too - but I’d go even deeper.
1
Why doesn’t Reddit pay mods? Like after a sub hits 500k or 1m subscribers, just pay people to not have any bias. The more subscribers, the more mods on that sub. All paid for full time work. Give them a little internal affairs department to make sure they don’t use emotions in their decisions. $522,400,000 for 2023 revenue.. it wouldn’t put a dent in profits but it could improve the platform immensely
1
Reddit doesn't care if mods have a bia's or not. In fact if you read the rules of this place, subreddits just having a bia's isn't the problem, its subreddits that claim to be impartial but aren't. For example, if you went to r/Conservative and said something that was against conservationism and got banned, it would be a "no shit" response from this community, as clearly they are bia's and don't hide that. r/news on the other hand claims to not be enforcing rules with a bia's, but as has been seen in many other posts they 100% do.
1
If you don't like being banned avoid the trans topic like the plague.
5
Or ya know, don't post obvious lies
2
Or just don't spread lies on a news subreddit
1
Considering that r/news is little more than left wing propaganda I’m really not surprised.
1
He was literally posting a lie. The shooter was not trans or male.
1
Reddit mods try not to defend mass shooters because they’re lgbt challenge
4
Except she's literally not trans. https://www.foxnews.com/us/lakewood-church-shooter-identified-genesse-ivonne-moreno-palestine-written-gun
1
The shooter wasn’t trans. That’s a straight up lie.
1
So it was a female to male? And now they are mad because you respected their pronoun? Or was it really just a normal person? If you made that up I can see why they are pissy. But if it was a FTM then they are just being hypocritical to what they preach. Weird…
3
No, the shooter wasn't trans *at all*. She never was. OP was banned because OP is spreading misinformation.
3
I see, Ya donno what they are bitching about then. Shouldn’t be making stuff up expecting people not to have a problem with it.
3
She had a male alias she used for fraud. It’s so silly too because the reason she shot up the place to begin with is because she’s muslim and doesn’t support Israel (which the church she attacked does) I seriously doubt the radical muslim woman is trans
1
Thanks for the info. I hadn’t heard anything about this shooting. But I guess I can kind of see why they think she was trans if the reports said she used male aliases. But yea if she was all religious like that and that was the reason she shot the place up it makes sense she would not be. Crazy
1
Now I'm confused. I thought men/ women related to gender but male/ female related to biological sex
3
probably cause OP is a liar whos spreading misinformation
1
You know, I've come across a *lot* of dumb motherfuckers on the internet, but this sub takes the goddam cake.
1
Then why are you here? <3
1
Well, truth still hurts some feelings I see.
1
You aren't alone. She does look like a man. How unfortunate for her, I really thought she was trans based on how she looks combined with the fact she shot up a Christian facility (since that's a trend now).
3
"We can always tell"
1
Hey, even AI can't tell a skeleton's race correctly 100% of the time. I'm comfy with 90-95% accuracy.
3
I doubt you can even get 50%
1
Zippertits at it again.
1
Similar for me, someone was going off about how insurance doesn’t cover transition surgery and called it a medical condition. I explained exactly why an insurance wouldn’t cover it from several insurance websites and then got perma banned. Wolrdnews is better anyway
1
Schizophrenic with criminal history of illegal gun possession, among other things, was still able to buy a gun "legally" somehow. Amazing.
1
If you haven't been banned in r/news, you probably haven't posted in r/news. Notoriously ban-happy mods with a strong left lean.
1
People here are wrong. You shouldnt be banned. Downvote is fine. Everyone is too sensitive and ban happy nowadays.
1
Misinformation is actually bad for people and society as a whole.
1
Even if OP was wrong what benefit is there in "banning" over thus? Just leave the comment up for people to respond to and disprove and downvote. Heavy handed censorship like this benefits no one except power drunk mods who forgot how to use the downvote button.
2
Misinformation is actually a real issue. It has and will continue to harm people and society.
1
Which is why it should be corrected not silenced. I had heard the original version too and the only reason I know its not true is people providing further context in this thread. A reddit comment is a lot different than a "tweet". This platform is literally designed to be a back and forth conversation. OP might not even have known it wasn't true.
1
Anyone else confused why op cares so much about other people 😭 just get a life move on
1
She literally gave birth to her own flesh and blood child (who was shot in the head) you’re fucking braindead legit
1
How did she give birth to a child? And why does she identify as a woman?
1
Hopefully you get banned from this too lol.
1
Who would even want to spend time on a news sub? Are you volunteering to receive clinical depression and loss of faith in humanity?
1
It seems there are a lot of conflicting reports. No idea how long it takes to look at the plumbing but I honestly don’t care. Whatever they identify as it’s clear they were mentally ill and people are dead.
1
Lmao ITT a dude patting himself on the back for thinking a woman was Trans. Who congratulates themselves for being objectively wrong lol
1
See, these people just have a hobby of misgendering people. It doesn’t matter if they’re cis or trans, they just enjoy being wrong.
1
Female that goes by the alias Jeffery? What was the explanation for the alias? This is like dudes saying they aren't gay they just like to paint their nails and wear womens lingerie. Dude you're gay. It's ok.
1
you got banned because there is a difference between being trans, and assuming misleading alias' for devious purposes. There is evidence she used male pseudonyms, there is no information at this point that she identified as a male. as an example, being a man that uses a female avatar in a video game doesn't mean you identify as a female.
1
you are whatever you are born as.
1
I love seeing a ratio before entering the comments
1
You were banned for promoting a far right conspiracy theory. Duh 🙄 Also, what gives you the right to treat potential people like this just because they are transgender? Are you nuts? Do we have to worry about you?