This subreddit is going to be banned

50    14 Feb 2024 04:19 by u/AntietamEnjoyer

Nuff said'

231 comments

31
Of course it is. Gotta make unpopular views seem popular before an election by banning all dissent.
-17
Oh please. I just discovered this subreddit. I'm already agreeing that it probably needs banned. The basic concept is already sus, and then there are the floods of bigoted comments being heavily up voted. There's plenty of reasons for this sub to get banned without bringing politics into a non political discussion.
1
Noo don’t ban them. I’m subbed to watch the quarantine in action. Keeping this sub open gathers all the winey idiots together and isolated in this place.
1
That's an orwellian knee jerk reaction. This sub is actually building a case against political censorship as all the top posts are bans for politically slanted reasons.
1
Translation "everything and everyone I don't like is racist..."
-10
Man, the Republicans got select last night and lost a house seat. Maybe time to stop being such assholes? Like maybe time to realize that your views are actually unpopular and you are losing elections, and it's not a conspiracy, you're just assholes.
8
A republican lost a seat ??!!!? 😱😱😱😱 It’s not like people lose seats all the time?!??! Surely you aren’t ignoring the democrat DHS head that just got impeached, right?!? Surely you aren’t constantly in an echo chamber that agrees with you…. Right?
-6
Yes, keep doing what you're doing, this is totally normal and seats swing 20 points the other direction all the time. 🤭 Republicans keep losing the latest elections, and refuse to look at the reasons why. Oh I saw the SHAM impeachment, can you please explain to me what his high crime and misdemeanor was? Because he's currently trying to negotiate more border patrol agents and Biden wants billions for the border but Trump said no. So you assholes are going to own the open borders policy from now on because you refuse to do anything.. they have said out loud they don't want to solve the issue that they have called an invasion, because Trump wants things to be worse so he can get elected. Trump also wants a recession, depression, he wants everything to go to hell so that he can get back in power and avoid jail and keep making millions by bedding down with our foreign adversaries By the way Mr sarcastic "Oh no will Republican lost a seat" the impeachment vote would have FAILED with the new soon-to-be house makeup. Elections matter. But keep whistling past the graveyard.
1
I’m not reading all that
0
That's why ya lose
2
Can’t wait to see your tears when TRUMP is re-elected 😂😂😂
1
Make them cry 2020! Oh, wait... Y'all lost and literally had a meltdown about it.
2
So ironic considering y’all’s new anchors literally cried on air like babies Womp womp nigga
2
Yeah, keep reliving that one win in your mind when you psychos barely squeaked through even though losing the popular vote by millions. Take no for an answer you racist fuckface.
2
We never take no for an answer nigga 😈 Trump 2024
2
Yep that's why a bunch of you are in jail. Terrorism. You don't believe in democracy any more because you keep losing elections. So you can cry and say it was rigged, but really it's just that you're losers.
1
I can’t WAIT to see you squirm and cry like a bitch. RemindMe! 10 months
1
I will be messaging you in 10 months on [**2024-12-14 21:52:18 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-12-14%2021:52:18%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/comments/1aqe2u5/this_subreddit_is_going_to_be_banned/kqg27un/?context=3) [**CLICK THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FRedditCensors%2Fcomments%2F1aqe2u5%2Fthis_subreddit_is_going_to_be_banned%2Fkqg27un%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-12-14%2021%3A52%3A18%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201aqe2u5) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
0
The statement of a psychopath that hates himself and hates the world around him. May your own mind devour you at night as you struggle to sleep with your evil soulless existence.
1
I’m not reading all dat
1
I know, two sentences is too much for a fucking simpleton. Seeth
7
Are you not aware that the Democrats *lost* the House of Representatives to Republicans in 2022, and lost several seats in the Senate to Republicans in 2022? Do you have any idea how moronic it sounds tie *one seat* to the entire country?
1
Yes they barely got the house but the "red wave" was much less seats than Obama lost or Trump lost. At this point they barely hold it and their sham impeachment wouldn't have even passed. Who holds the Senate Einstein? Ya lost that. Since 2020 Democrats have outperformed in every single election. In this district it was a +8 republican win to a +8% Democrat win. Anyone that knows shit about politics knows this was a crucial seat and that's why Republicans spent millions upon millions in that district, Einstein. You people are known for your Rose colored glasses. "Everything is fine sir! Best army in the world mr. Putin sir!"
5
I'm not a Republican, and despise the modern GOP and everything it stands for, so knock off the "you people" shit. As for the rest of your rant. . . You know what? Never mind, you're obviously trolling. At least I hope so, if not it doesn't bode well for your mental well being.
1
Well then stop making excuses for them, they keep losing elections. They just had an offer for billions to increase border agents and secure the border, and they said no. Anyway, who cares about any of that shit right? Let's talk jobs. I like the strong economy and strong job creation under the Biden economy. I'm worried that if Trump gets in again we will once again lose millions of jobs. He will once again give tax cuts to the wealthiest in society. I like how Biden implemented the 15% minimum tax rate for corporations. I like how Biden isn't a megalomaniac douchebag that makes Hitler quotes and has talked about "dismantling the Constitution" You can insult me all you want, doesn't make you astute.
5
What the fuck is wrong with you?
7
Obvious troll is obvious isn't it? Stop feeding it it will eventually die
3
You are far too mired in identity politics to ever have a free, open mind. I hope you wake up one day.
3
"Trump said no" Two points: Trump isn't presently in office, dickhead. Also, we're playing catch and release at the border, and that funding was wrapped in a bullshit omnibus bill. Without deportation it's a moot point, and immigration has been an issue for decades. Maybe all the sanctuary cities from Democrat mayors virtue-signaling open borders as a political divide issue to create tension along the lines of race-relations may have had something to do with it? Now those cities are drowning in migrants, which they cannot afford, drawing hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars that would otherwise be going into infrastructure or social programs for actual Americans, in the middle of a housing crisis partially caused by printing trillions of dollars and handing most of it to banks. Illegal immigration costs half a trillion dollars a year--think we could find a better use for that money (Other than sending it to Ukraine and Israel, which we're doing at a laughable budget deficit)? You couldn't give me more evidence people with a room-temperature don't deserve to vote if you tried.
1
Keep drinking that kool-aid, and keep losing those elections. Biden has deported more people than Trump, Biden has drilled more gas and oil than trump, all you have are lies. You are Putin's useful morons trying to rip apart the USA but you're not the patriots, and patriotic Americans are here to let you know. We had enough of your orange Jesus freak.
1
Tell me one factual lie, not based on your opinion, in my post.
1
All of your spin about the border deal is bullshit. The border patrol Union gave their blessing to the deal. There's only one reason that deal failed, and that's because Trump told them to vote no. Because he wants the problem to be worse for his campaign. We support ukraine, we support israel, not to help them, but to help our own national security. That's not omnibus, those are crucial issues that have broad bipartisan support. Funny thing about that last election, people mentioned Republicans sabotaging the border deal.
1
So, tell me, considering that Obama deported more people than Trump, and Biden deported more people than Trump--which is now a *good* thing--why was Dronald Drumpf such a evil orange racist for making enforcing immigration and building a border wall a cornerstone of his platform (largely blocked by opposition) such an evil racist move? Why did he get blamed for putting children in cages (a photo taken from the previous administration), and opposition constantly beat the drum during his administration that "no person is illegal"? Why is a closed border good now? Is it maybe because it negatively impacts the economy? Do you think that, ineffective vaccines, corruption in fatality reporting during covid, and runaway inflation during the greatest transfer of wealth from the increasingly shrinking middle class to financial corporations, which has left the American public reeling every time they open their wallets, might have something to do with it? Don't gaslight me, you dork.
1
Blah blah blah, support your orange Hitler all you want. He's going to be coming unhinged before your very eyes. We both know that immigration has been a problem for years it's just that Trump came at it like a dunce, first he said Mexico would pay for it, a lie, then he actually tried to take money away from our military to build it. And yes there was a new policy to separate families including ripping crying babies from her mother's arms. Put in by Jeff sessions. You don't really need me to point out the poisoning of the blood rhetoric that Trump uses is directly from Hitler do you? I think you're smart enough to know that and you just like people like Hitler. We finally have a bipartisan Congressional deal and Trump scuttles it because he's a total dipshit that hates America. Billions for the border, approved by the border patrol Union that is decidedly Republican leaning, the deal worked out by immigration Hawks in the Republican party, was scheduled by Trump because he doesn't really care about the border, he just wants to get back to making those millions at his hotels. Did you see how Trump made millions of dollars from China on his tax returns, what's up with that shit? And you really want to talk about Hunter Biden's job, really? Get help.
2
I didn't bring up Hunter Biden's job. So, like the rest of this exchange, it's been you attempting to put words in my mouth, or wantonly accusing me of whatever you want with no justification. I'm sorry you lack the self-awareness to recognize that. It must be difficult, living like that.  At least to address your points: The justification for separating families, if I remember, was to try and screen for human trafficking. Secondly, even if Trump was entirely pig-headed about immigration and the border, the Democrats poured blood, sweat, and tears into keeping it from happening. So, strange to see that suddenly change? And uh, I don't know how to tell you this: I didn't vote for Trump. I don't vote. I lived in a blue state, and got really, really tired of listening to people like you. I found him fundementally disgusting from the outset. I thought it was hilarious when he beat Hillary, however, because of how smug and obnoxious a lot of neoliberals were becoming. Then Trump became president and that definitely made it worse. And well, I don't know how to tell you this--you're never going to win hearts or minds by accusing anyone that's rhetorically taking you to task of being a nazi. Which I kind of figure is a personal favorite of yours. Which is why I'm blocking you.
2
This idiot did the same to me. I said nothing of Biden or politics and started ranting at me about how hunter biden isn’t a criminal.
1
Correct, Trump isn’t in office. So the Republicans in office should stop taking their marching orders from him.
1
Swing 20 points the other direction? Are you referring to the number of minorities moving their vote from Biden to Trump in key swing areas according to recent polling?
1
It was a 16-point swing, Republicans won by eight points last time, and lost by about eight points this time. All in an important swing district. Dumb people in this thread might not get it, but GOP strategists are freaking the fuck out. The stupid polls and astroturfing were wrong as usual.
1
Right. I'm referring to pulling for the next presidential election.
1
Look dude, the polling was wrong saying Hillary would win and the polling has been fucked up ever since. We live in a new era. Democrats have outperformed the polling in all the special elections. Right wing doing their best to brainwash a bunch of minorities to their side, but it's not really working the way you guys plan. GOP does hard work to win these members over, and then Trump says something like "immigrants are poisoning the blood" of america, a Hitler quote.
2
Brainwash? Are you insinuating that minorities are unable to think for themselves? You probably think they aren't capable of getting identification either. How racist of you. Only time will tell I guess.
1
Yes brainwash. And thank you for ignoring the Hitler quote, it's what you assholes do best.
2
"Poor kids are just as bright as white kids." "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man." And someone didn't want his kids going to school in a racial jungle. You ignore those? Sometimes people say stupid shit. I'm not here to argue talking points.
1
Yeah we're not here for the sanitizing of Hitler quotes thank you very much. I guess Obama was a racist too for picking this guy as his vice president huh? Either that or you have taken these quotes out of context and ignored an awful lot about Biden's public career. Worry about the racism on that side of the aisle, and maybe you'll do better in some of these elections!
2
🤣🤣🤣 And every minority in the Republican party is called Uncle Tom, mouthpiece, or whatever slander of the week. Did you know you think things are going great though.
1
Yep they're basically like that one slave that would work with the master. There's a good damn reason why you only have like two black people on that side of the aisle, it's all white. Meanwhile people like Ron DeSantis running for president tried to ban African American history from being taught, and may comments that slavery was good for the slaves.... And you wonder why over 90% of African Americans vote with us democrats, it's because we have always had their back. If your game here is to attempt and point out racial disparities on both sides of the aisle, you're going to lose this game bro.
2
Always had their back? More like always pretend to care about them, and stoking racial fires, once every 4 years to get votes. I'm not sure it's working anymore. Biden may have broken that strategy. https://apnews.com/article/republicans-black-voters-election-trump-biden-5cdcb6cdf042ccf2b506becdaf2fc218 https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/us/politics/biden-trump-black-voters-poll-democrats.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/09/19/trump-poll-support-black-hispanic/ And in case you don't want to click, here is an excerpt from one of the articles. "New polls by The New York Times and Siena College found that 22 percent of Black voters in six of the most important battleground states said they would support former President Donald J. Trump in next year’s election, and 71 percent would back Mr. Biden. The drift in support is striking, given that Mr. Trump won just 8 percent of Black voters nationally in 2020 and 6 percent in 2016, according to the Pew Research Center. A Republican presidential candidate has not won more than 12 percent of the Black vote in nearly half a century."
1
I don't know how many times I have to say that the polls have all been wrong! Yes there is an effort to recruit minorities and that is somewhat working. However, when we look at the data from recent elections, Biden support is quite strong including minorities. Nice attempt to flip the script, but there's a reason why the Republican side of the aisle is all white, except for Tim Scott who just got his ass handed to him in the presidential primary.
1
Biden won't even make it to the next election. Something about cognitive decline. Then they'll have to find a way to get Kamala out of the way because nobody likes her. It'll be interesting to see how they explain that demographic away. With regard to Tim Scott, that just opens him up to be Trump's VP pick. 😆
1
Way to change the topic when you lose! We know who the real racists are, they're the ones that love Confederate flags!! I'm not even going to talk about your deranged, unhinged conspiracy theory. Do yourself a favor and watch one of Biden speeches before you repeat this bullshit about cognitive decline. Then go watch one of Trump's. Not the highlights, every single minute of both fucking speeches. You can't bend reality to your wishes.
1
Conspiracy theory? It's actually kind of difficult to find a Biden speech, much less a coherent one. He doesn't come out much. When he does they shoo him off the stage relatively quickly once he goes off script. And with that, I know this conversation is no longer working continuing. Wow .. just wow.
1
Considering Biden is so competent, does that mean you support him standing trial for collecting classified documents for decades, long before he was president, storing them in multiple, poorly secured, locations around the country? Or are you one of those who believes in a two-tier justice system?
-2
For real! I’m tired of the same several bait posts that infest here and other subs that are just lame attempts at excusing Republican talking points. “Wow, I got banned for saying this one innocent thing! Isn’t it crazy we can’t criticize gay people for existing?! Where does the madness end?!”
1
*“…I was triggered by a micro-aggression comment, so those people need to be silenced!”*
1
Conservative ideology in a nutshell 😂
1
You’re not introspective, are you? I didn’t promote a political ideology. After reading a number of your comments, it’s clear you’re triggered by diversity of views, beliefs, and opinions which don’t align with yours, and that you would prefer those expressing differing views be silenced.
1
Nah
1
Leftist bot says what?
1
So.. why exactly am I an "asshole" again??
1
Here's one example. 60,000 rapist's babies were just born because you assholes think big government should come in between a woman's private decisions with her doctor. You hoist up the most divisive con man criminal as president, who literally wants to help destroy America with his buddy Putin, and wonder why we call you assholes. There's a million reasons but basically you side with evil and try to claim piety.
6
So... its "evil" to try and preserve the life of human children, GOT IT! I guess you didn't see the story that broke yesterday about John Brennan, the CIA and the other members of the "five eyes" concocting the fake Trump-Russian collusion narrative.... I'll assume you still think that Donald Trump is really a super secret Russian spy! BTW, who stood by and allowed the Russians to amass 150,000 troops and military equipment on the border with Ukraine and stated "a minor incursion" into Ukraine was acceptable? Couldn't I say that Joe Biden is the "buddy" of Putin?
1
Yes it's evil for you to force that religious belief on others, and the voters are not going to let you forget that. Trump definitely colluded by spreading stolen emails hacked by a Russian operative gleefully spread through WikiLeaks. He literally stands with Putin and says he believes him over our intelligence services. There were 100 documented meetings between the Trump campaign and Russians where they promised to lift sanctions. Now Trump is making sure Ukraine doesn't get any more aid so Daddy Putin can finish his terrorist invasion. Joe Biden called out Putin from the beginning. Trump is melting down, you bet on the wrong fucking horse LMFAO
3
No evidence of your 60,000 fake rape children, not surprised... the rest of your comments are well known symptoms of Trump Derangement Syndrome. You may want to check yourself into the nearest hospital ASAP...
1
Keep at it, false lies from your echo chamber means Democrats have won every single special election since your little insurrection and the fall of roe versus Wade. Get out of your bubble and you'll see the story of the 10-year-old rape victim that was not allowed to get an abortion by her state government. These are real lives, real stories, whether you believe it or not, and women are fucking pissed and so are some of us men! You people are ghoulish and evil because you sit here and actively deny the pain and suffering you cause with your policies. [rape babies in Merica](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/64k-women-girls-became-pregnant-due-rape-states-abortion-bans-study-es-rcna135565)
2
Your language leads me to believe your pretty young so I'll keep it simple and clean.. You're assumming everyone who is victimized by a rape wants an abortion. This is simply not the case as my wife's co-worker is a perfect example, even keeping her mixed race son who grew up to serve this country in the Marines and is the love of her life. I will also add that the article states their findings are "estimates".. "The researchers used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the FBI to create their estimates" I personally think their should be an exemption for rape and incest but this is for states to decide, as this is clearly a state's rights issue and "abortion rights" is nowhere mentioned in our Constitution.
1
You're coming around to my original point, women are pissed, the right wing is siding with the rapists as usual. If you think there should be an exemption, well that's not how it's playing out in red America. Keep ignoring it and you will keep losing the elections. You want to explain away the rape babies, that's on you, you have to look yourself in the mirror. You can find horrifying individual stories, as well as these estimated statistics by a respected medical journal. Asshat.
1
You always know when someone feels they are losing an argument when they call you a name at the end. I guess that's the state of our ignorant youth these days in this country... Most Americans support restrictions on abortion with an exception for rape and incest which is about where I'm at. Later little boy.
1
Then most Americans should be in horror at what the GOP has created by repealing roe versus Wade. Most Americans reject the gop's stance on abortion and the elections have been showing that without fail. Most Americans actually support very little restriction on abortion, roe versus Wade had it right with fetal liability. Exceptions require a police report, I.E. a "proof" of rape... There are also supposed to be exceptions for the life of the mother, but the way it's working out is that women are nearly dying in parking lots... and doctors are leaving those idiotic red States. Don't believe me? Just look at the six Texas women that are suing Texas because their lives were put in jeopardy by these laws.
1
You confuse the Trump extortion which he was impeached for with Joe Biden enforcing what was already the policy of the United states. Hope you see the difference there, and Trump's case he was doing the opposite of our policy, and Biden's case it was the US policy. Plus, that prosecutor story was flipped around by you guys when it comes to burisma, not that facts matter to fascists... Yes Hunter Biden got a cushy job due to his dad's name but the prosecutor actually was investigating burisma so you have it backwards. Meanwhile you don't give a fuck that Jared kushner and Ivanka Trump got jobs in the goddamn fucking white house with zero experience? Oh and then they reported millions of dollars of income while working in government? Stinks to high heaven, no wonder you try to flip the script little fascist
1
Jared Kushner and his hedge fund made their money 6 months after leaving the White House. Are you really trying to compare someone asked to work in the White House with someone who accepted a job on a foreign Board of Directors only because they wanted inside influence to his father, who just happened to be the sitting Vice President of the United States? Really??
1
It's insane that you can't see where the real corruption lies. Again, Biden pushed the policy of his administration, no personal favors. Jared got two BILLION dollars from the Saudis right after leaving the white house. After having a top secret clearance that was rejected but then overruled. After the Saudi fund advisor said the money should not be invested because kushner had no experience running a hedge fund. You really think you're a patriot defending these assholes? CHARISMA IS SUCH A NOTHING BURGER COMPARED TO TRUMP AND HIS HUNDREDS OF STOLEN CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND GOD KNOWS WHAT ELSE HIS UNQUALIFIED FAMILY MEMBERS WERE DOING IN THAT WHITE HOUSE LIKE A GODDAMN THIRD WORLD COUNTRY
1
I guess you don't care that Joe Biden stole classified documents as a Senator 40 years ago which is as illegal as you can get, with boxes of classified documents located at four different locations, including his freaking garage At least Trump has the presidential records act and that is being litigated in court. A quid pro quo is a nothing burger? Participating in a bribe, which is what a quid pro quo is, I guess doesn't mean nothing as long as there's a "D" after their name. Pretty funny dude! I guess you concede that Jared's hedge fund got a Saudi investment after leaving the White House, so what's the crime?
1
Bahaha no evidence was found that Joe Biden did anything wrong. The presidential record act states that ex-presidents cannot take documents you utter fool. You can argue with me all you want but it's playing out in the courts, Trump is a criminal and you're his fool making excuses for him with a bunch of false points. You bore me, your entire cult is crashing down and bringing the Republican party with it... SAD!
1
You're ridiculously funny... you may not want to look at the current polls in the swing states and the fact that over 70% of Americans think Biden is too old and too senile to run for reelection. Joe Biden has a 38% approval rating, the lowest of any president other than Jimmy Carter..
1
The ultimate polls are the elections. It's weird like the polls have consistently been wrong, almost like they're funded by those.pushing a narrative... Just look at this election last night, the "polls" had the Democrat ahead 4 points, but he won by 8 points. Democrats have outperformed the polls in all these last special elections which they have won, and this one stings for you, this was a swing district. Well at least Americans got one thing right, Biden is old. Pretty crazy that such an old senile guy has passed the most legislation since LBJ.
1
Fuck everyone who uses the term “nothing burger”
1
There was no crime committed regarding burisma. It's a false narrative, nothing will come of it, and you guys need a new scam because that one's dead in the water.
1
Thanks for the info, bot.
1
Beep boop blow me
1
You don’t even know what you’re responding to, get your shit together. I said nothing of burisma but you’re so quick to defend it you must know it was corruption.
1
If you follow the thread, someone brought it up. Now piss off, I'm going to go argue with smarter people than yourself.
1
You replied to me not someone else. So smart.
1
Someone doesn't know how threads work LOL what I was saying was in context to what was said above, for fuck's sake
1
Go write another wall of text, useful idiot.
1
Useful to who? We know who you are a useful idiot to, the barbaric thug Putin... May you have nightmares tonight.
1
Go simp for Biden’s incoherent ass some more and stop replying to me.
1
I thought they admitted a dnc staffer leaked the emails?
1
No the emails were hacked by the gru. They're cut out hacker was named Lucifer 2.0 and had direct connections with Roger Stone. It was a spearfishing campaign and various Republican accounts were hacked as well. And just like that, a bunch of Republicans became Putin's best friend just like Trump. Working with a foreign adversary that would like nothing more than to see us disintegrate and they're doing a damn good job at getting it done.
1
Are we talking about the emails seth rich leaked about the dnc being antisemitic against Bernie? I remember everyone didn't give a shit where it came from but everyone tried to make a big deal about it instead of what was in the emails.
1
Oh you didn't see where Seth Rich's family got a significant money settlement from Fox News for those lies? That's what's crazy about the lies, they're proven wrong and then dipshits like you still go around parroting them. You remember that because that's what Russia wanted you to think, because Russian intelligence Services hacked the emails. You know, our enemies that want America to crumble? [FOX NEWS PAID SETH RICH'S PARENTS AFTER CONSPIRACY LIES](https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/11/24/fox-news-settles-years-long-lawsuit-over-seth-rich-murder-conspiracy-theories/)
1
I seen where the fbi was ordered recently to turn over 20k files related to his case.
1
[Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election Volume 5.](https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf) >Page 948: *It is our conclusion, based on the facts detailed in the Committee's Report, that the Russian intelligence services' assault on the integrity of the 2016 U.S. electoral process, and Trump and his associates' participation in and enabling of this Russian activity, represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modem era.*
2
And yet, the Five Eyes story and a debunked Russian Dossier.....
1
To read these thousand pages and come away with the conclusion that they amount to evidence of “no collusion” really involves a protestation of faith, not a dispassionate assessment of presented evidence. Debating what constitutes “collusion” is not worth anyone’s time, given that the word has no agreed-upon meaning in this context and that to say that there was none of it doesn’t answer in any event the more important question of what the facts amount to. Here are the conclusions the Intelligence Committee’s evidence supports: - The Trump campaign and Donald Trump himself were certainly aware in real time of Russian efforts to intervene in the 2016 presidential election. The campaign had a heads-up that Russia had stolen Democratic emails. And Russian operatives sought and received a meeting with senior Trump campaign officials promising “dirt” on Trump’s opponent. As the campaign wore on, and the Russian efforts were increasingly made public, Trump personally and publicly encouraged them. - The Trump campaign was run for a time by a man with an ongoing business relationship with a Russian intelligence operative, to whom he gave proprietary internal polling data. - The Trump campaign did not discourage Russian activity on its behalf. In fact, it sought repeatedly to coordinate its messaging around WikiLeaks releases of information. The campaign, and Trump personally, sought to contact WikiLeaks to receive information in advance about releases and may well have succeeded. - The campaign sought to obtain disparaging information about Hillary Clinton from actors who either were Russian operatives or it believed were Russian operatives. It did so through a number of means—some of these efforts were direct. Some were indirect. - The Russian government and affiliated actors clearly regarded the Trump campaign as a prime target for influence and recruitment. Russia targeted a diverse array of people associated with Trump for contact and engagement through an astonishing variety of avenues. Some of these attempts were rebuffed. Many of them were successful. The result was a sustained degree of engagement between the campaign, and later the transition, and Russian officials and cutouts. - Trump’s personal and business history in Russia provided a significant opportunity for kompromat. Such material was very likely collected. There is less evidence that it was ever deployed, though Trump’s mere awareness of his vulnerability gives rise to substantial counterintelligence concerns. - Trump’s active pursuit of business deals in Russia while running for president and denying any such deals created significant counterintelligence risk. - Trump’s campaign, and later transition, were filled with a remarkable number of people who had secret interactions with Russian actors, about which they lied either in real time or in retrospect. - All of this activity, particularly cumulatively, amounts to a grave set of counterintelligence concerns, in which any number of Trump campaign figures—including the candidate himself—exposed themselves to potential coercive pressure from an adversary foreign actor. - Trump to this day will not criticize Russian President Vladimir Putin or acknowledge unambiguously Russian intervention in the 2016 election.
1
Interesting.. how do you feel about the Oversight Committee's report on the Biden Family Corruption?
1
The Mueller Report is covered in the Senate intelligence committee's investigation. It was a much more in depth investigation than Mueller could achieve. You should really read it. I think the investigation into the Biden family is a fishing expedition that keeps blowing up in Republican lawmakers faces, like a Road Runner cartoon. I have zero doubt that Joe Biden is corrupt and I believe corruption should be stamped out of politics. I feel that it's pretty incompetent of the oversight committee not to have found anything more substantial.
1
150 suspicious activity reports is not substantial? Wire transfer documentation and a long list of bank accounts, with bank account numbers, showing foreign money flowing to nine different Biden family members is not substantial? Money flowing through 20 different shell corporations and foreign bank accounts is not substantial? I hate to break it to you but many people have been found guilty in court with a lot less evidence than what has been presented thus far. I would know, I worked in the system for 30 years both state and federal. The Mueller report was a $40 million investigation into Donald Trump with Andrew Weissmann as one if the prosecutors, a well established Trump hater..
1
Firstly, you are the one that brought up the Mueller report like it had some sort of final say on the subject, while I am trying to explain to you that the Senate intelligence committee used that report as a starting point for their own, much more thorough, investigation. It's odd that someone that has worked in the system for 30 years, both state and federal, needs that pointed out to them. Secondly, third party fact checkers have explained that the SARs, and all the money flowing to various companies and Biden family members were legitimate business transactions or investments. Unfortunately, the evidence was obfuscated in the press by some Republicans. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/17/how-republicans-overhype-findings-their-hunter-biden-probe/](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/17/how-republicans-overhype-findings-their-hunter-biden-probe/)
1
Oh I see... maybe you can explain what the business the Biden's were involved with and you do realize that one of the main criteria for issuing a suspicious activity report is that there is actually no business activity occurring in the account, other than funds flowing in and out if an account, don't you? Are you really forwarding me a link to a Washington Post story to make your point?
1
Ah, no... The Senate intelligence committee report does not state that at any point. What you have linked in Marco Rubio's press release on the report, made completely independently from the committee. His assertions are seriously undermined by the report itself. I've already said that there is no agreed meaning of the word 'collusion' so your quote there falls completely flat as far as I'm concerned. If you read the report, not even very far into it, just the Findings section at the start, you would see that: - “The Committee found that Manafort’s presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. Taken as a whole, Manafort’s high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services ... represented a grave counterintelligence threat.” - “While [Russian military intelligence] and WikiLeaks were releasing hacked documents, the Trump Campaign sought to maximize the impact of those leaks to aid Trump’s electoral prospects. Staff on the Trump Campaign sought advance notice about WikiLeaks releases, created messaging strategies to promote and share the materials in anticipation of and following their release, and encouraged further leaks. The Trump Campaign publicly undermined the attribution of the hack-and-leak campaign to Russia and was indifferent to whether it and WikiLeaks were furthering a Russian election interference effort.” - “Trump and senior Campaign officials sought to obtain advance information about WikiLeaks’s planned releases through Roger Stone.” - “The Committee further found that [George] Papadopoulos’s efforts introduced him to several individuals that raise counterintelligence concerns, due to their associations with individuals from hostile foreign governments, as well as actions these individuals undertook. The Committee assesses that Papadopoulos was not a witting cooptee of the Russian intelligence services, but nonetheless presented a prime intelligence target and potential vector for malign Russian influence.” Additionally, if you keep reading, you will see that Rubio initiated a vote to include in the report the statement that "Donald Trump did nothing wrong." The vote was lost because obviously anyone who looks at the evidence can see he was absolutely in the wrong. I'm starting to doubt your credentials there champ.
1
That's okay, doubt all you want but I thank you for contributing to my monthly pension.. There's no agreed definition of the word "collusion", funniest thing I may have ever read. Perhaps I should buy you a dictionary with the pension you help fund.. The fact of the matter is the Russian Dossier was a paid for political hit piece with no basis in fact and was used as a justification to obtain repeated FISA warrants to illegally to spy on a campaign. Did the Trump campaign attempt to obtain some salacious information regarding Hillary Clinton? I'm sure that's the case as every campaign does, except Trump didn't pay $5 million dollars for a former British intelligence official to make up a dossier..
1
What I said was there is no agreed definition of the word "collusion" **in this context**, you know context?... That thing you keep trying to step around? I have in no way contributed to your imaginary pension, I'm not in or from America. I am telling you the facts as most people can see them around the world. You asked me about what I find substantial earlier and the answer to that, in context of this entire exchange between us is: criminal charges and convictions. Trump is facing those because of substantial findings in investigations. Biden is not because of a lack of substantial findings in investigations.
1
3rd request... what was the Biden business model?
1
You still haven't even addressed the Senate intelligence committee report and/or the direct quote from it in my first reply to your claim. From there all you've done is dance back and forth between topics, acting like you're some kind of expert, but showing you don't even know what you're talking about. And when I call you on your crap directly, the best you could muster up was some indignant response as if this whole thing is about the "Biden business model". I've already pointed out that Republicans obfuscated the evidence found in their investigations when talking to the press. I even provided a link, you choose not to engage the facts laid out within it. Honestly, it's pretty funny how badly informed you are about all of this. What are your news sources?
1
4th request... what was the Biden business model? If you don't want to answer, just say so. For someone who is not American, you sure know a lot about American jurisprudence and Congressional Committee reports..
1
If you can't address the Senate intelligence committee report, just say so. Since you haven't provided any sources that corroborate any of your claims, I guess I can safely conclude that I do know more about certain aspects of America than you. Man that must sting, after 30 years working in the system... Both state and federal! But you should know, right?
1
5th request..... I did address the report, can't help if you refuse to read my comments.. will you ever answer how the Bidens made up to $30 million in their "business"?
1
No... You didn't. First you replied as if you have no idea what it was, then you tried to pivot to the Mueller report, **then** you tried to ascribe a deliberately misleading quote to as being a part of that report. If we're really going to get to the bottom of everything, I believe I was first in line. Refute the findings of the Senate intelligence committees report that I originally linked to you, or otherwise prove pretty much everything I've speculated about you is essentially accurate.
1
I never said I refuting anything... fact is there was NO FINDING that Trump colluded with the Russians, which had been the accusation FOR YEARS. Again, please point me to where it says that in the report. 6th request......
1
I already did: [https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/s/4eacB3CLoD](https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/s/4eacB3CLoD) There are ten points contained within the report that you have failed to address or refute. Like I said, I was in line first. You are yet to make a single legitimate request, let alone 6. Now, put up or shut up.
1
Sorry but there is no finding there that states Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election. I will just assume you can't show this and that you refuse to answer my question. You know exactly what the Biden family was doing to make all that money from foreign sources, just like most Americans do.
1
[removed]
9
You will never be a woman.
-9
Oh yes, don't forget the fascistic technique to always bring it back to hatred of the other. That culture war BS ain't winning you any elections. I don't like to think about trannies all day like you.
9
You're a fascist
2
hahah...
-5
Sorry to break it to you but being a crybaby right wing piece of garbage isn’t that popular
1
Na, righties just tend to be hateful and ignorant which goes against most sub rules.
1
No, the lefts arguements fall apart under even the slightest scrutiny so they call all disagreement hAtE sPeEcH to avoid having to defend those ideas.
26
Reddit mods are a superstitious and cowardly lot.
15
No such thing as free speech on reddit Even comments pointing this out are auto deleted
-6
I mean, there isn't, nor should there be... unless I'm reading you wrong and you're in agreement there (and if so, sorry I read you wrong there)? Reddit isn't the government, so the only free speech that applies is theirs to allow what speech they promote and disallow what speech they don't.
6
That's still oppressing my freedom of speech, I share MY opinions that are formed from MY own experiences in my 30 odd years of living. Get silenced by some fedora wearing gimp because I said something he didn't agree with
1
Your freedom of speech is guaranteed by the first amendment to the constitution. It means the **government** can in no way abridge your right to say anything you want. The only exception is when speech translates directly to harm to another person. The first amendment in no way guarantees your right to say what you want on other peoples' (corporations') property and expect to be allowed to stay. All these social media platforms are private property.
4
stop being obtuse. that boring old line is getting old. Screw that notion and screw you too if you don't like free speech to exist!
2
Obtuse? We don't have any rights here. Reddit is the host, we are the guests. They give us privileges, and can take them away, and there is nothing you or I can do about that. I am not being obtuse or otherwise "misunderstanding" your claim to free speech rights on this platform. You simply don't have any, and you don't want me to point that out.
1
I most certainly do have a claim to free speech because its the right thing to do. And no amount of grandstanding by you can change that fact.
1
>its the right thing to do. That's your best argument. I agree. But claiming it as a right means they have no choice to give it to you. But they do have a choice. I see no problem asking them to make the right choice.
1
yeah thats all you can do is hope they figure it out eventually. but I dont have much hope for Reddit specifically. They have a long list of receipts saying they want freedom of speech and then over 10 years they slowly did a complete 180 and told everyone to pound sand. That's super lame in my opinion.
1
Reddit is a corporation. Since Wall Street runs America, it is part of the government. Take “elite” money out of politics and then we can talk about
1
What a perfectly unamerican, antisocial, regressive and tbh, pure evil things to say. Think about WHY we have free speech and what the implications are for a society to have that right. Then ask yourself what motivations someone might have for choosing to not participate willingly with free speech. Free speech is the most powerful tool that oppressed people have to fight their oppressors. Choosing not to act that out in every aspect of life, business or government or personal, reeks and shouts that you’re trying to oppress people. Let me repeat that for the people in the back… The only reason to not act out free speech is because you are oppressing people. The only people against free speech are oppressors.
1
>unamerican The constitution. I'm pointing out that the law of the land does not guarantee the right to free speech on a private platform. That doesn't mean you should be censored. Reddit has reasons to not be heavy-handed. And they even allow people (e.g. in this sub) to take them to task when they are. Just don't do it by ignorantly claiming it's your right. It's just not.
1
Autism man ffs. Yes the spirit of free speech should be acted out by every American and American company even though no one is forcing you. The reason we have free speech is arm the oppressed so they can fight against their oppressors. Limiting free speech, even in your private life or within a business, is done with the goal of oppression. No one should support or defend the oppression of others, it’s immoral, also a thing that isn’t required by law. Imagine thinking it’s only right or wrong to do something if there is a law about it. The morally correct thing is to allow people to speak their minds. It doesn’t matter if it’s legal or not. Anything less is an attempt to control people’s thoughts and is the very definition of fascism and authoritarianism, which isn’t a good look.
1
>The morally correct thing is to allow people to speak their minds Who's arguing? Just don't claim it's your right to demand it. They should do the right thing, and often do, but they are not required to by law. That's it. That's all I'm saying. If someone is doing the wrong thing but it's not illegal, all you can do is call them out. Just breathe. And be glad that the constitution is not actually irrelevant. It's the only legal document that enshrines the idea that we have inalienable rights at all.
1
You are free to express your views and opinions without fear of persecution from the government. That doesn't mean that you are free to say anything in private spaces without repercussions.
4
Corporations should not be allowed to limit human rights.
3
I rarely ever side with corporations, but corporations are not limiting your free speech. You're beyond welcome to create your own platform, stand in your front yard, or go to public spaces (without breaking other laws) and speak your little heart out.
1
This is the same argument used by people that wanted to have the ability to exclude gay people as customers or employees. “Muh private business don’t tred on snek” is just pulled for leverage in oppression of people
1
Except under section 230 of the communications act it makes it pretty clear that platforms like Reddit can’t have it both ways. They can either be a platform that allows people to share their own opinions and viewpoints; or they can be a publisher that specifically curates content that people can see. Plus we know for a fact that a lot of the censorship going on with social media platforms has absolutely been directed by pressure from the federal government. The government is using these companies as a proxy to get around the 1A, they are absolutely limiting our freedom of speech.
2
Take the foil hat off and go touch grass. If covid nuts had been censored, their message wouldn't have been everywhere. Social media platforms limit certain types of language per their EULA in order to avoid being liable for damages. It's not a deep state conspiracy to keep you from eating horse paste.
1
>Take the foil hat off and go touch grass. https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-covid-censorship-machine-social-media-facebook-meta-executive-rob-flaherty-free-speech-google-11673203704
1
Sensational language aside, of course the DoH was communicating with FB during the height of a worldwide health crisis to curb misinformation that was causing unnecessary deaths and putting people at risk. Further, with the benefit of hindsight, we know unequivocally that the misinformation was just that....misinformation.
2
The government should never be in the business of deciding what truth is. Who’s “misinformation?” At one point the government were pressuring social media corporations to censor people discussing the lab leak theory as “conspiracy.” I’m sorry but no matter how you slice it this is a gross overreach of government power. You’re justifying it because you agree with their reasoning for doing it, but it’s still censorship and it’s still wrong. The government has been less than honest throughout the pandemic about multiple things. “Misinformation” is code for things that some people don’t like and they think should be censored.
1
I'm not playing "there is no objective truth." When nothing is credible, anything is feasible and this is why conspiracy theories work so well. Any evidence of the contrary is evidence of the conspiracy. I dont say this with malice or judgement, but know that the world is not scheming against you. There are trustworthy sources in the world, and more people are striving for truth than trying to hide it. I know how scary the world can be when everyone is out to get you. I've been there before and it sucks. Good luck, I truly hope you break free.
1
>Except under section 230 of the communications act it makes it pretty clear that platforms like Reddit can’t have it both ways. They can either be a platform that allows people to share their own opinions and viewpoints; or they can be a publisher that specifically curates content that people can see. Wow... Who lied to you? Websites do not fall into either publisher or non-publisher categories. There is no platform vs publisher distinction. Additionally the term "Platform" has no legal definition or significance with regard to websites and doesn't even appear in the text of 230. All websites are Publishers. Section 230 specifically protects online Publishers. "[AOL falls squarely within this traditional definition of a publisher and, therefore, is clearly protected by §230's immunity.](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1075207.html#:~:text=Id.%20at%20803)" >Plus we know for a fact that a lot of the censorship going on with social media platforms has absolutely been directed by pressure from the federal government. The government are using these companies as a proxy to get around the 1A, they are absolutely limiting our freedom of speech. In the case of coercion, government is the bad actor, not the websites which are free (1st amendment right) to accommodate or coordinate with the government according to their own will. [This has been litigated in court multiple times.](https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2021/10/government-jawboning-doesnt-turn-internet-services-into-state-actors-doe-v-google.htm) The Government (both Parties) shouldn't be asking for content removal. >Just look at the Covid pandemic as an example. Social media companies were pressured by the government to crackdown on opinions about the origins of Covid as well as people who questioned (rightfully) the efficacy of the Covid vaccine and Covid mitigation efforts (social distancing, masking, lockdowns etc). Again, website can do as they see fit.
1
Reddit is trying to thread the legal line between a forum and a publication. Forums can't be sued for anything said on them, but they also can't control anything either. Publications can control discussions, but can also be sued for anything said on them. Right now the government isn't doing anything legally about it (presumably because it's useful) but it's technically illegal for Reddit to sensor people.
1
Except reddit itself doesn't publish anything? It's a private forum that hosts everyone else... If you wanna point me to somewhere in their terms of service that states that your speech belongs to and is copywrited to them, then I'll accept they're a publisher (owner of what's published). Until then, they're absolutely a platform, not a publisher.
1
No, I'm saying that they (and most social media) are trying to claim the legal benefits of both without the legal limitations that each have. They're absolutely a public forum (and thus not allowed to censor speech) but trying to behave as if they have the legal right to.
1
Except for the fact the social media sites get their censorship orders from the government.
1
I'd like to subscribe to your conspiracy theory newsletter. Seriously, corporations are not government. They lobby the government to be sure (as all businesses do to promote their interests), but they do not get censorship orders from the government. If they did, the government would be restricting *their* free speech rights. Please read more into free speech when you can, both what it is and who it applies to... because you're applying your understanding wrong here.
1
It is unreal how insane the posters here are. Good lord.
5
Are you being serious? You can't post anything conservative or anti authoritarian in most reddit political or news subs without it being deleted by mods. Whether or not it's legal- it's authoritarian and bullshit.
2
It’s definitely illegal since it’s government dictated. But then again, stealing elections is also illegal
1
It's also within their free speech rights, brother. They are not in any way, shape, or form obligated to provide a soap box for people to stand on when it's their soap box - being forced to do so would go against *their* free speech rights. Why is this so hard for some to understand? XKCD has an excellent explainer on this. I'd link to it but don't know if links get flagged on this sub, but just Google "xkcd free speech".
1
Totalitarians always have an excuse for censorship.
1
Actually the government does mandate most censoring for these sites. The adl, kind of a secret police for the Wall Street regime, decides who can post and what can be posted online.
1
Buddy, when you're talking about secret police doing this stuff in the background, you're going neck deep into the conspiracy pool...
1
Yeah, you’re correct that they’re not so secretive about their mission. The only thing they are secretive about is their ( ( ( identity) ) ).
1
Lol nah. You couldn’t be more wrong
2
Not to mention 99% chuds.
1
They are the worst
1
Without over generalizing, I would say a lot of them are too easily offended to be on reddit and actively working to undermine reddit's profit margins. Reddit will eventually have no choice but to address the mods problem. I bet the lackluster IPO will start the process....
18
What crazy is any post even on r/conservative asking why Reddit is so left leaning, gets closed out by mod dictators 🤦🏽‍♂️.
19
That's because that sub got neutered years ago through threats of bans and now it's run by a bunch of spineless Romneys after actual conservatives were removed.
1
I was an actual conservative for a decade but got pushed out of every circle and subreddit because I didn’t support Trump (because he’s not conservative at all).
13
Have you looked around reddit? Granted there are pockets of conservative sub reddit but Jesus is it left leaning...
17
It’s not even left leaning, it’s hardcore liberal with pockets of conservatives sprinkled in like the Amish.
6
This is the most apt description of reddit I've seen so far lol.
7
Say something derogatory about lgbt....
9
Not even that I got site wide banned for a week just for saying only one group of people own a penis. I'm on the left but apparently I'm a hateful bastard because I paid attention in anatomy class.
1
Why?
4
Replace liberal with communist and you're more accurate.
2
One in the same.
5
At this point it's getting to be yes
1
Communists and liberals hate each other. Their ideologies call for the eradication of the other. They are not "one in the same"
-10
Good. Conservatives are like old sick dogs and need to be treated accordingly.
13
^ Shit an actual Nazi might say
-9
Nice projection.
12
You just said your political opponents should be shot.
-7
I'm not gonna shoot my dog you sick bastard
7
Old, sick animals, by far and large, tend to be put down. That's also exactly what you meant, and you know it. The gaslighting is real.
-4
I thought going after terrorism was a good thing?
7
People who don't fall in lock step with the progressive cultural upheaval are terrorists.
-5
Yes
7
It's not projection when you say it out loud, brother.
1
I bet you won’t even look other men in the eye when you meet them in real life.
1
Oh are you offended? Poor little pussy
2
You kiss your dad with that mouth?!
1
Don't speak about your grandfather like that.
2
Not surprised you kiss elderly men.
1
You spend a lot of time talking about old men kissing. Just come out already. It's ok. Quit hating yourself.
2
Open homophobia wasn’t the self-loathing response I expected.
1
Nice projection jackass.
2
I'm very left leaning bordering on communism and Reddit is still soooo much more left than me on certain topics.
1
There’s times where Redditors remind me of what I expected McCarthyism witch-hunters to be like.
1
Left-right is an economic distinction and it's only creepy US libs who have tried to turn it into a social one. All of the US "left" are neo monarchists that yearn for a return of a subjugated public.
1
The problem is also that the mods at r/conservative have been threatened before with having the subreddit shutdown, this does leave them on a tight line to walk. The last major warning was 8 months ago, so they were given the choice of crack down or shutdown. Here is one of the comments from the mods: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/149be1f/ban\_grandstanding\_eg\_the\_admins/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/149be1f/ban_grandstanding_eg_the_admins/)
13
Good cause why would allow anything that might be different from the hive mind
5
Having so much power on the internet, being jobless freaks in their real lives.
4
Fuck em
4
The election cycle bans got my sub a long while ago. LibsofSocialMedia
1
Sucks subs like that always devolve into dozing hotspots through mod inaction. 
4
I've been censored numerous times on various subreddits for nothing more than having a minority opinion. Reddit is the king of censorship.
3
Yep 👆
2
I just got a warning for reporting a user for "threatening violence" at "someone else"... the comment they made that I reported was "She's a domestic terrorist and should be taken out". Apparently, my reporting of them for making that comment violates rule 8 some how. [https://imgur.com/a/ugx60aY](https://imgur.com/a/ugx60aY) [https://imgur.com/a/DrwZu2v](https://imgur.com/a/DrwZu2v)
3
It's gonna be kinda funny when that happens ngl
2
A small price to pay. At least we don't get rounded up and tortured. Not yet anyway.
2
Kind of on the nose
2
[Mods and admins have issues with conflict. ](https://opendoorstherapy.com/dealing-with-conflict-on-the-autism-spectrum/
3
And people not in complete agreement with them regardless of their own rules.
2
Maybe you should leave
1
You're not gonna like it... when I get angry... 😡
1
Another option for reviewing removed content is your ***Rev***eddit [user page](https://www.reveddit.com/y/A!n!t!i!e!t!a!m!E!n!j!o!y!e!r?all=true). The [real-time extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/direct/) alerts you when a moderator removes your content, and the [linker extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/linker) provides [buttons](https://i.imgur.com/0BAImPq.png) for viewing removed content. There's also a [shortcut for iOS](https://www.icloud.com/shortcuts/62bc7570613c42cb8b851fad264136df). The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to remove this comment. This bot only operates in authorized subreddits. To support this tool, [post it on your profile](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) and select ['pin to profile'](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png).   [^(F.A.Q.)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/f.a.q./) ^| [^(v/reveddit)](https://www.reveddit.com/v/reveddit/-redirect) ^| [^(support me)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/donate) ^| [^(share)](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) ^& [^('pin to profile')](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png)
1
We've flown under the radar for a while because compared to the majority of subs, we are tiny. We'll never show up on the front page either. As long as we're not going overboard here it should be fine. It has already lasted a fair few years.
1
From me experience as a lefty on Reddit, these sorts of subs tend to attract a lot of us lefties looking for morbid entertainment. I don’t say that to disparage your views or the community you have built here. I just want to warn you about the increase in engagement and attention that subs get once the entertainment seekers begin to catch on. I’ve seen it happen with plenty subs before
1
I think we need some censoring in here. Obvious shills are absolutely shitting this thread up.
1
I mean, most of the whiners here are just bigots getting booted after trolling normie subs. They'll just go whine somewhere else, and the rest of us will follow and have a laugh at them.
1
I don't think it will unless someone posts something good shinning a light on the reddit admins, if that started happening then this place would be in danger. I will say I am surprised the power mods don't come through here and ban regular commenters (that sounds like something they would do).
1
same thing to /r/watchredditdie
1
Every post on here doesn't seem to be about getting banned for offering some alternative opinion. It's always just people being total fucking assholes and expecting people to just accept it.
1
Reddit bans everything, they are gonna ban themselves into a corner and barely anyone is going to want to use this failing platform soon
1
But Watch Reddit Die is gone....
1
Mouth breathers going to mouth breathe.
1
Na, no one cares what a few right wing whiners post here. "I said racist shit and got banned wahhhh" You can have this safe space to cry about it.
-4
I think the mods need to step up and remove the countless “I was a huge asshole and got banned from a sub because of it” posts. It’s as boring as when conservative claim they’re being “censored” because they’re breaking a website’s ToS. 
1
Sounds like a bunch of commie gobbly gook.
1
I don’t know what that means lol
1
Exactly what I thought too 🤔
1
Care to explain?
-5
That’s too bad this is my new favorite sub to laugh at right wing reactionary perpetual victims