441 comments

47
Pro tip: block u/safebot u/safebot and u/safestbot to prevent most automatic bans.
7
First 2 are the same
6
Autocorrect got me
6
All blocked 🙃
1
That was the last ditch liberal effort to prevent you from sharing this vital information
1
reddit is owned by a right winger lol 
1
Interesting name you got there
1
Everyone needs a good asshole blasting now and again. Nothing wrong with that.
6
But then I can't filter out those dogshit subs
1
All the subs are dogshit subs... But people are still around.
1
It’s a good pre filter tho to automatically see which subs are batshit crazy
1
This. If a sub is going to ban me for participation in any sub or joined to any sub, they aren't a sub I want to participate in. I've gotten many auto bans as well as bans for ridiculous reasons, and each one I take with pride.
1
only problem is if you segregate your accounts (i dont frequent my adult-fun-time subreddits on this account because people posting in r/transformers dont need to click on a post i made and see noodz/BDSM shit), you can inadvertently trigger permabans for "avoiding the subreddit ban" by using a different account when you get mass-banned on one account. Ask me how i know.
2
Alternatively: avoid the auto ban and force a sweaty mod to waste his time to ban you lol
1
Thanks bud. 👌 Never would have thought to block the bots.
1
I'm not the sharpest pencil in the box. How do you block these?
1
Thanks!
1
Idiot question, how do you block them?
1
Click on the link. On the right, in their profile, under the word "Chat", is "More Options" Click on that. Then click on "Block User"
1
Thank you!!!
1
Reddit shouldn't have bots.
1
Doing god’s work. Thank you
1
Good to know. Doing good work there, human.
39
Biological terrorism lmaooo
4
😂see what I told em? Got me a ban from the reddit staff but worth
3
Yea worth it! Bro just let people do what they want, even if you don't agree with it
3
Whaaaaat? My brain just imploded. You can't be what the in crowd doesn't like! It's 2024 FFS.
1
I've never been what the in crowd likes. The in crowd can go fuck itself on a rusty metal spike, and if they need to borrow one, I've got plenty to lend.
15
What does that even mean?
3
I guess... climate change???
8
My guess was not wearing masks 24/7
5
Oh shit that is a good idea! I like how we are left to guess because they don't explain anything!
1
I thought it was something about trannies
17
Being anti-lockdown, anti-mask wearing 24/7, or being anti-enforced vaccinations. There was a bot going around blanket banning people from *a lot* of subreddits if you so much as *commented* in a subreddit deemed to "promote biological terrorism." It was really prevalent during lockdown, but I guess it still exists. I seriously got banned from a dozen or so subreddits because I corrected somebody's spelling once in r/CoronavirusCirclejerk. And I was only there via a tenuous Reddit suggested subreddit chain of, like, visiting some page about an upcoming movie, the actor from it did an interview on Joe Rogan's show, and then Reddit suggested the aforementioned subreddit. Vaguely curious, I clicked a thread to see what it was about, and the rest is history. And there was some bitch-ass addendum in the message that banned you that if you basically prostrated yourself before the *ever so great and merciful mods*, wore sackcloth, kissed the mods' feet, begged for mercy and clemency, and vowed to change your ways and never return to those *evil*, *evil* subreddits that **dared** to question the narrative, the *ever so great and merciful mods* might *deign* to un-ban you. ​ But, uh, **FUCK THAT**!
1
Here's a sneak peek of /r/CoronavirusCirclejerk using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusCirclejerk/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [The rest of the world wants to forget that they all went crazy for a moment back then. Never let them forget.](https://v.redd.it/h41crybv0d6b1) | [154 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusCirclejerk/comments/14atmjc/the_rest_of_the_world_wants_to_forget_that_they/) \#2: [Remember this Logic?](https://i.redd.it/b0uc9vnhgqma1.jpg) | [88 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusCirclejerk/comments/11mv9cj/remember_this_logic/) \#3: [Absurdity](https://i.redd.it/v9ik6mzdq8oa1.jpg) | [31 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusCirclejerk/comments/11tcq3w/absurdity/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
7
It's stupid. I commented on a PCM post one time and caught two auto bans from other subs. Intentionally or not, it is just intensifies the echo chambers of those types of subs. 
1
Yeesh I'm a leftist and I think that's a bit much, if you don't want to stay home or wear a mask that's fine as long as you aren't a dick about it and accept if some people want to stand over there away from you.
1
Ah. The old apologize, and it better be a real apology and we'll know the difference, and we will consider letting you return. I've only run into that once. The atheist sub wanted me to apologize for saying "not all religious people are bad." Fuck that nonsense.
1
Same thing . I was browsing popular and commented on a Joe Rogan video . Instantly banned from subreddits I’ve never heard of
5
Taking a deuce after eating 5 jalapeños
1
😂
2
I think it might be about bodily autonomy
1
Telling people the masks didn't protect you, they protected the people around you. That was banworthy for misinformation and dangerous rhetoric.
1
It means you don't agree with killing babies. Everyone who frequents the pro-life subreddit is banned from quite a few subs as well.
-3
Conservative can be called a lot of things, but bioterrorists because they are too big of snowflakes to wear masks is a stretch.
1
Its actually fucking comical

1
Masks haven’t be proven to do shit especially since we are told they can be scarves, bandannas, etc
1
Lol, no. Lol, man it must suck to be this misinformed. Lol, like holy shit. Lmao. You made my day because I will never be this ignorant.
1
Boost up retard
1
Keep wearing your useless masks jabbie. Time for a booster! You’re on the right side of history right??
1
I have a simple philosophy on this: if you look at this link and reject it for not agreeing with your beliefs, do the world a favor and don't seek medical treatment when you're sick. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
1
I'm not seeing any statistical analysis on that page that proves the efficacy of non-medical or non-particulate masks. Probably because it doesn't exist. Your cloth and neoprene masks did nothing except stop Karen from screaming at you. The biggest factor of all was just population density. We have the case data from around the world, and we know that lockdowns didn't help either because cities that locked down and those that didn't, but had similar population densities had nearly identical spread rates within very minute margins of error. Turns out that being made of liquid and meat and living with a large number of other creatures made of liquid and meat makes you pretty damn susceptible to diseases that like to take up residence in meat and travel by liquid.
1
these same useless orgs keep saying the jab is safe and effective even for babies when there is clear evidence of the exact opposite. you are arguing at the behest of Big Pharma which has an extensive criminal history of lying and bribery. your words and links mean nothing to me.
1
Well, you didn't throw a lot of facts out there, but you have strong feelings and surely facts care about feelings, right?
1
Google “Pfizer criminal fraud” and “Moderna criminal fraud”, there you go. This is who you are arguing tirelessly for.
1
Were many of the masks N95 rated? Here is the thing, my wife is a Nurse, and I spent many years in medical units in the Army, especially when this broke out. If the mask was not an N95 mask that prevents the spreading of virus, it is pretty much worthless. Masks can be a great thing, I often had to wear them at work before COVID. However, if the mask is not rated for the pathogen, it is pretty much worthless. About like wearing a sheepskin condom and HIV. And feel free to look it up, Yes, it is a condom. No, it will not do a damned thing to protect you from HIV or HPV. But it will protect you from bacteriological STIs like Syphilis or Gonorrhea. Wearing the wrong protection will not help you, or anybody else.
1
Yep. I got the same thing from them for participating in the prolife subreddit.
23
Yes this sub is only about conservatives getting their "justice" and liberals are never wrong. It has been HARD left for a long time. Just leave.
1
This is why every generic sub that doesn’t bend liberal needs to be careful of these gross power hungry freaks invading and corrupting the sub into another r/politics spin off. Justice Served used to be about criminals getting their comeuppance, but libs hate that so now it’s just another “Republicans bad” clone, they did the same thing to Publicfreakout and even BlackPeopleTwitter used to be funny memes before it became a place for blue racists. I see them trying to do it to r/lookatmyhalo and r/AmericaBad in real time, they can’t stand to know a popular sub exists out of their control.
1
I want to agree with your comment, but then you made a generalization about liberals that isn't always true.
1
I know there are exceptions but it’s a fair generalization, like saying conservatives want Trump isn’t always true but it’s true for enough to make the generalization. I’ve seen nothing from liberals to show they’re bothered by crime unless they’re the victim, most of the time they’re very dismissive of it AT BEST. Especially since the riots of 2020 where not only did they not care, they told you that caring would make you a right winger. You can’t have a problem with crime and vote for people who endorse bail funds and support soft on crime policies that clearly don’t benefit anyone but the criminals. If you can point me to where I can find an abundant source of liberals who ever talk about violent crime that a) doesn’t directly affect them and b) isn’t just the type of crime that they can use for political propaganda I’ll gladly check it out. Till then I’ll just keep seeing the ones giving pushback to anyone who isn’t going full on crime denial.
1
You don't think liberals care about crime when they actively campaign on things like addressing wage theft, rape, sexual assault, domestic violence and other crimes?
1
That user most likely considers those "the type of crime that they can use for political propaganda" and therefore can be dismissed. He seems well meaning and intelligent, but his biases run deep.
1
Trust me if there was just one thing I wish liberals would change, it would be their stance on violent crime BEFORE they become a victim. I don’t even care about party, it would be to the benefit of all society. It doesn’t help that a lot of them have made caring about crime a “right wing talking point” so if I watch them act accordingly what else am I suppose to presume about the left wing? I was actually hoping they’d show me a place where liberals take crime seriously but instead he just reaffirmed they only care about certain crimes that they can “campaign on,” as I already knew.
1
>instead he just reaffirmed they only care about certain crimes that they can “campaign on,” as I already knew. Maybe consider that "rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, gun restrictions related to mass shootings..." are indeed taking crime seriously, and aren't just talking points.
1
What percentage of shootings are part of shooting massacres? When you get that small number, show me all the Democrats concerned about the larger number of the shootings, then ask yourself why you can’t find many if any. Is it because they only care about the “gun restrictions” part and gang shootings don’t fit that part of their agenda so

they don’t care?
1
>how me all the Democrats concerned about the larger number of the shootings, then ask yourself why you can’t find many if any. >Is it because they only care about the “gun restrictions” part and gang shootings don’t fit that part of their agenda so

they don’t care? I don't know any Democrats who aren't concerned about all shootings. Their answer to the problem often is restricting guns. You may see it as political, but it is what they see as the solution to a problem they care very deeply about. Espousing gun control is their way of showing they care, whether or not you choose to see it that way. As for bail funds, our Constitution allows for bail, for many reasons. Everyone is entitled to a fair trial and to not be held prisoner without being convicted. The purpose of bail is to make sure someone shows up to trial, not to keep them off the streets. Bail funds meet the spirit of the concept. Have accused (and eventually proven in court) rapists been released because of bail funds? Yes. But the American justice system recognizes that bail is just.
1
Gun restrictions are for people who’ll follow the law, won’t do anything to stop guns used by gang members. So you’d think libs would care about going after the criminals who use illegal guns, but they don’t, if anything I’ve seen more of them outright defend gang members from being called “thugs” like we just saw in KC than they’ve shown any concern with ridding society of them. Ignoring rampant theft because they’ve made stealing easier to get away with, punishing vigilantes and criminalizing self defense is something exclusive to the most progressive parts of America. You’ve got libs who’d never bail out a political enemy, out of their principles but would bail out violent offenders, yeah that really shows you how much someone cares about DV that they’ll bail out a man who beat his wife and let him finish the job. Their right to bail doesn’t mean you must help them get bail, if you actually cared about the victim you wouldn’t do this. And liberals certainly do not put victims first. Ive come away from this convo learning that I didn’t generalize liberals enough.
1
You have to stop focusing on the rhetoric, man. Stop thinking that because people disagree with you that they think a certain way.
1
Well then why have any laws? If criminals are going to break laws no matter what, let's just get rid of all of them
1
No, right wingers made “crime” a racist dog whistle decades ago. Now it’s just not clear what anyone is talking about anymore, and no one ever tries to find out, since it’s just easier to ban people and believe that you’re right and everyone else is wrong. Every political ideology is built on pure fantasy.
1
He doesn't seem intelligent to be honest. He contradicts himself repeatedly.
1
He seems like a lot of people I know in real life. Intelligent in most matters, but completely biased and unable to see it when it comes to political matters.
1
What did he say that was intelligent? To me intelligence would be articulating his argument without contradicting himself. Being informed on policies on both sides. Knowing and using the correct terms. He hasn't done any of these things and he has done many things that to me would point to low intelligence, like not understanding his own statements, misusing terms, generalizing to widely, and more.
1
Your reasoning is asinine. “Someone didn’t spend the time to research every perspective, and articulate it immaculately, this leads me to believe they are unintelligent”. You reek of self righteousness, and blowing hot air nothing more, nothing less.
1
So what did he state that was intelligent?
1
You’re asking me a subjective question, and a question that’s ultimately irrelevant to my statement. I don’t have to quantify anyone’s statement, but I can also point out the absurdity of an individual who deems another individual as being “low IQ” because they didn’t frame their statement they way they would’ve liked. It’s completely arrogant and self righteous. Which aren’t commendable attributes in 2024.
1
I agree that is what he is doing. Yet he is well-spoken and able to reason. His bias is blinding an otherwise intelligent person.
1
So what did he say that was intelligent?
1
Are you just arguing for the sake of arguing? I said he is well-spoken and able to reason, but is blind to his own biases. A lot of otherwise intelligent people become stupid when it comes to politics, religion, or other emotional subjects.
1
I wasn't. It's very telling that you can't state what was intelligent or well reasoned. Why couldn't you answer the question. They were simple questions. What did he say that was well reasoned? What did he say that was intelligent?
1
Did you read my post? You don’t care actually about crime if you only care about specific crimes that benefit your political campaigns. The same liberal that supposedly cares about rape and DV will support bail funds that free rapists and abusers, I don’t think Kamala endorsing a Nazi freedom fund would go over well but a fund that’s releasing rapists wasn’t a problem for many libs. The same liberal that cares about gun violence only the 1% of the time it’s a random mass shooting will then vote and support soft on crime DAs who’ll let gang members off easy and continue the more common occurrence of gun violence that liberals completely ignore. Wage theft isn’t the only form of theft, it’s just the only form the left cares about. So my generalizing was fair since you made an example of yourself to prove my point.
1
So how can any political party care about a crime and not campaign on it then? What does the right care about that they don't campaign on?
1
You don’t campaign on cherry picked crimes, if you really care, you campaign on fighting crime in general or at least the most rampant crimes. You especially don’t become someone who’s dismissive when it comes to all those other crimes that you dont see a way you can benefit from. Liberals do seem to be more sympathetic to criminals than their victims, that’s why it’s not unbelievable they have and continue to be soft on if not bail out criminals who rape, attack and kill people.
1
So youre dismissing crimes and criticizing those that dismiss crimes... You state that they an campaign on crimes as long as it's "rampant" enough (which domestic violence and sexual assault both would meet the definition of). So that sounds like you're just justifying the things tour side campaigns on.
1
I’m not dismissing anything, I’m asking why pick and choose and not being naive enough to believe it’s cause they care about it, since they’ve done nothing but enable and sympathize with criminals
1
You're dismissing domestic violence and sexual assault as political agenda. You were very clear about that in multiple comments.
1
I’m dismissing the idea you really care about those things while you bail out those who perpetuate those crimes.
1
They have worked to expand definitions of what is considered sexual assault or rape. They have worked to increase protections for survivors including being able to terminate their leases with protection, they have increased funding to testing rape kits, they have removed exemptions for domestic violence that allowed abusers to receive less severe punishments for assaulting a partner than they would if they assaulted a stranger and more. They have reduced loop holes that allowed marital rape to not be viewed as a crime. But you think these things are nothing. Why? Because they also believe that people who are not proven in court to be criminals have a right to bail? Do you not believe in "innocent until proven guilty"?
1
Because you’re letting the actual people who commit those crimes go. Now can you tell me why they care more about the rarest types of shootings and say nothing about the more common types?
1
No. Democrats are actually pushing for longer sentences for things like rape if the person is convicted. The left is not letting them go when found to have committed the crime. I'll address what you're asking as soon as you answer my questions that you have chosen to skip. I won't participate in your deflection.
1
Idk why you’re attributing all these to Democrats, but what can be attributed to them is revolving door justice. Women saying they’ve been harassed by the same man because of relaxed laws against keeping them safe from their victims is something Democrats did. The other day a congresswoman shared that black women are most often victims of DV, but didn’t go into details on who the most common perpetrators are, this is what I mean. They use certain crimes to benefit their narrative but actually do not care to do anything that would target the perpetrators.
1
Because they campaigned on them, wrote the bills and passed them. Order of operations. You haven't answered the questions I asked that came before yours. So no I will not participate in your unethical deflections. I'm sorry that you're scared of answering questions that would force you to admit you either don't follow your stated beliefs or you know would prove you wrong but I will not coddle you.
1
Interesting you refuse to recognize all the pro criminal policies one party has enacted on its own that’s even got some of them recalled where they’ve allowed crime to fester the worst.
1
I haven't refused anything. You're the one cu posing to not answer the questions you were asked first. You clearly know you're wrong or you wouldn't be scared of them. Good bye
1
Well, Democrats aren’t supporting a candidate with 91 felony indictments, so that’s something.
1
Because none of those were for a violent crime, maybe if he mugged a pregnant woman Democrats would build monuments in his name too.
1
What led to the $88.3 million he owes E. Jean Carroll.
1
Idk is that a federal indictment? Do you know who’s Tara Reade?
1
There’s that whataboutism teet y’all can’t wean yourselves off of. She was discredited and defected to Russia with her “friend” and alleged Russian spy, Maria Butina. But, sure, same thing. LOL!
1
They probably started liking her when they realized [she's a deranged hoarder cat lady living in a rat infested house who paints rocks and posts things like "rape is sexy".](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibolATnWr-Q)
1
All of which is political lawfare. You can't tell me that if he had not beaten Hillary in 2016 and decided to run in 2020 any of this would have mattered. This is all because he has the audacity to run against the democrats and revenge because he beat Hillary in 2016. We are running on 8 years of "Get Trump" and it's completely obvious to anyone with a brain how stupid and ridiculous it is. How many millions have been spent now on "Get Trump"? They started impeachment proceedings before he was even sworn in, and that's just insane. Democrats are stupidest bunch I have ever seen. There was another way but democrats were to stupid to see it, they were to wrapped up in "Hillary lost" and "GET TRUMP". Take your loss, then you have 4 years to find, groom and get out there in the public eye a good candidate. Someone mid 40's, a middle of the road democrat. Maybe someone nobody had really heard of, someone fairly new to the scene with no baggage. Someone that would appeal to all democrats, Independents and maybe some Republicans. But no, "GET TRUMP" was the word of the day and has been for the past 8 years.
1
Yes it’s just true a lot of the time lol
1
The bad thing about the words "Liberal" and "Conservative" in regards to politics, is that they are often grouped with "Far Left" and "Far Right". This really only seems to be an internet thing. I work with the public and most everyone that I talk to (I'm a bartender a couple nights a week) have both liberal and conservative views. The people that run to the internet and scream the loudest are the ones who have a hard time finding people to relate to in real life. Any rational person would agree that the way the far left and far right conduct themselves is garbage. In the same respect any rational person can sit and have a conversation about their views and be opened to them being challenged. The ones who make broad assumptions only want to live in an echo chamber and have their views validated instead of challenged.
1
THANK YOU. God, i just wished more people realized this :( I've found that many more people i meet irl are actually very moderate and rationale compared to this websites "redditors". The only rationale explanation (in my mind) is that bots or astroturfing accounts are brigading posts with cookie-cutter comments and upvoting/downvoting certain posts to push a narrative. Its just propaganda with extra steps.
1
Pretty sure mixed race marriage is progressive for one such in Cajun Territory
1
Not sure why the insult. But no we have many mixed race marriages. We are fine.
1
I could dig it if it was lefties. But it's like urine mixed with desperation soaked authoritarian Twitter fake lefties.
21
I remember the first time that happened to me. It was r/witchesvspatriarchy. I was confused as to how or why a sub I never even visited cared enough to ban me or why I should care. My response wasn't as colorful as yours, but it did get me muted from the mods for a month. 😅
22
God that’s a used tampon riddled echo chamber from hell

13
I popped in there out of curiosity after the ban and wow...
19
The girls who used to bully people in school are witches now I guess
1
Generous title for crystal collectors and female incels.
10
I was banned from there for asking a simple "why", but then I went and fucked up insulting the mods and was reported
1
Oh a known hate sub that reddit leaves up?
1
They still allow that sub where they make fun of people who die from Covid. It’s mind boggling and genuinely depressing
1
Which one is that? If it's the Herman Cain Award it's not that they *make fun* as much as express anger. The name is a clue: Herman Cain is dead and his death was easily preventable.
1
There’s a *ton* of posts where they celebrate people dying. It’s genuinely one of the most hateful subs on reddit. There’s 0 reason for it to have a place here.
1
Sounds like you think ppl need to be perfect. I'm sure I'll be blocked next, but this whole movement literally was against saving lives. I think its very human to be angry at these people.
1
I didn’t save one single life, that’s just what your fellow slacktavists told you.
1
>this whole movement literally was against saving lives This is like saying that people who fought against Communist takeover of innocent countries are against "sharing". If you're not a kindergartener you should know better than this.
1
Ah. A r/whitepeopletwitter and r/politics user. Welcome to the block list.
1
Hermain Cain award is absolutely making fun of the dead. It's an awful sub that mocks people dying because they disagree politically.
1
I think the sub is in poor taste but it’s not blocking people who disagree politically. It’s essentially a Darwin Award sub offshoot focused around covid. Unless taking a vaccine is considered a political stance (well it is among conservatives apparently.)
1
You obviously know the COVID vaccine became political. Liberals are on booster 37 still catching COVID and conservatives think even looking at the shot will give you aids. The sub is in bad taste and it's laughing at people dying. It's legitimately one of the worst subs in this god awful site. It's just a way for lefties to laugh at people dying and still somehow feel morally righteous and huff their own farts.
1
They died because *they* were making it political. It’s still a Darwin Award. That much is just scientifically accurate.
1
Whatever makes you feel better about mocking and laughing at someone's suffering and death. You're still the bad person in all of this and do not have the moral high ground.
1
Darwin Award is people dying by making stupid decisions. People died of Covid because governments wanted to make bio weapons. It’s not even in the same universe.
1
You should be relieved that the mentally ill "witches" don't like you. Degenerates.
1
Solid observation, asshole-raper.
1
A weird one for me was getting banned from /r/conservative for using a phrase, in a different group, that was banned in their sub. The phrase is "southern strategy" btw. You can talk about how Democrats were the slave owners and how they were the dominant party but you have to pretend that Dixiecrats never became Republicans
1
Seriously?
1
Yes. It happened to me too. R/conservative doesn't tolerate any deviation from their group's conventional wisdom.
1
WTF. I have a follow up to my previous post. Shortly after I posted about r/conservative banning me, merely because they disagreed with me, I got a notification that I was banned from r/whitepeopletwitter. I don't recall ever being there, nor could I find anything in my history or posts about having been there. They claimed I harassed someone, which is total BS considering that's not what I do, and I wasn't there anyway. Guess they wanted to make sure they didn't hear anything they disagreed with either.
1
Damn 
1
Hahaha, I got banned from WPT for participating in this thread lmao
1
Yea? What's WPT?
1
Oh, the same one I mentioned, lol. Sorry, tired. Yeah, they are snowflakes
1
Holy shit me too!!!
1
So. Much. Cope.
1
I'm curious what you mean by this, I don't speak chronically-online-right-winger very well anymore.
1
I also got banned from conservative by pointing that out.
1
Because they didn't. Why would they have? The Democrats were the party filibustering the civil rights act. And multiple pro-segregation Democrats are STILL in office and also still Democrats... Joe Biden is one of them.
1
Surely you don't think Strom Thurmond was alone. https://www.history.com/news/how-the-party-of-lincoln-won-over-the-once-democratic-south
1
Hahahaha that sub is hilarious. What a bunch of crazy Xanax fueled cat ladies.
1
Hey, there's nothing wrong with being a cat lady. Just don't take Xanax and pretend to be a witch.
1
Fair enough!
1
i'm banned from that sub because my magic was too powerful and my spells were irresistible. /shrug
2
I’d take that as a blessing and move on. Literally femcels
1
Same thing. I said the tampon bag in the restroom should be more like a sharps container or bio med bag and got banned from the women's incel club that was really popular years ago.
12
Hahahah 'Biological terrorism' meaning- if you believe a man can't magically turn into a woman, then your a terrorist.
1
"Fascist" is a popular one these days too.
1
Don’t forget the big bad buzz words “bigot” and “chud”

1
They're pretty damn good descriptors for some. Who called you a bigot and why?
1
Maybe try not voting for fascists lol
1
That's because historians are noticing a huge rise in fascism all over the world. Italy just elected a self described admirer Mussolini
1
Ugh get fucked
1
What a well thought out and respectful reply.
1
Why would I respect them, and what more thought is required? It isn't difficult to assess the validity of a bigoted statement, especially when they are outright dismissing medical and psychological facts because of their own issues with human sexuality and gender, and a desire to needlessly conform with rigid, simplistic social constructsm. What would you consider to be an appropriate and sufficiently respectful response to their content? Correct me if I'm wrong, but considering the way you are jumping to their defense, I presume you are inclined to either agree with them, or view their view as an equally valid perspective, in which case you're welcome to get fucked as well. If I'm mistaken, then this was way overboard and I'm fully prepared to apologize. I just don't know what you expect I should have done - politely explain to him why what he's saying is hateful, dismissive, deceitful bullshit, as if this could possibly be a simple misunderstanding? Incidentally, what about his comment gave you the impression that he was being even the slightest bit thoughtful or respectful, and therefore deserving of the same in return? I believe I adequately reciprocated the tone and intent towards one asshole that he levied at an entire group of people who just want the right to exist as who they are. Thought out and respectful enough for you?
1
Getting angry because people out there have strict definitions for things isn’t appropriate
1
That's what I thought, I refer you back to the second line of the second part of my previous reply >I presume you are inclined to either agree with them, or view their view as an equally valid perspective, in which case you're welcome to get fucked as well. Or if you prefer, you can find what you're looking for in the initial comment I made >Ugh, get fucked We give words meaning, and in many cases, there are potentially multiple reasonable or justifiable ways to define terms and labels. That said, I won't insult your intelligence by pretending you actually believe this is nothing more than a semantic, etymological issue. I think I've given this significantly more thought and respect than it deserves just by virtue of being honest. While the other user was childish and actively disrespectful, both of you have misrepresented and diminished the reality of the experiences, challenges, and attitudes surrounding trans issues.
1
I believe that ripping someone's body apart and throwing them into a biological waste bin is wrong. I am pro life. THEY are the terrorists
1
I was banned recently for simply saying “it is crazy that Reddit blatantly allows antisemitism but you will get banned for saying men can’t (biological pregnancy fact)”
1
Apparently you still don't understand that gender != sex. But do go on....
1
The word “gender” was made up by John Money, someone who advocated for sexual relations between boys and older men. It’s a made up word that means nothing. “If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way.”
1
Protip: All words are made up. So shit on the dude's character all you like, science agrees that gender is real and it's a separate concept from sex.
1
That’s not how science works. That may be your science but I reject the science of a man that thought it was okay for men to rape boys.
1
It's not magic, it's science, it's existed for thousands of years, you just don't know much about it because the Nazis burned all the research at the Institute of Sexology when they killed all the transgender people in Germany. For years, they used the same kind of language you're using now in order to dehumanize them so that no one would care when they murdered them all
12
I'm bleeding heart liberal (if you don't believe, just check my history lol). Looking in r.conservative gives me a brain aneurysm every. single. time, so I've learned to avoid it for my mental health. That said, getting autobanned from *any* sub because you post *anything* in different sub is fucking stupid, and reddit is fucking dumb for allowing bullshit like that.
1
Reasonable.
1
Im a bleeding heart conservative (if you dont believe me che- wait i dont talk about politics) looking in r/conservative gives me a brain aneurysium every. Single. Time.
1
I'm a bleeding heart conservative and I was banned from r/conservative for stating that I wish Trump would go away so politics could cool down. I've voted for him 2 times btw
1
"Bleeding heart conservative" Is such an oxymoron Bleeding heart is an idiom meaning "one who gives too freely" It was an insult used by conservatives and then reclaimed by progressives. You cannot be a Bleeding heart while voting to hurt those who need help the most and supporting tax breaks for the rich
1
The only reason i said it was to copy parrot what the person above me said.
1
You're a classical liberal. Not a fucking communist.
1
I'm a fucking communist, sex for everyone!
1
I got auto banned from a sub a while ago for a single comment on r/conservative. The comment was a critical reply to a post.
11
Mods proving they are far left by doing that.
3
What the hell is Biological Terrorism?
1
Ima buss đŸ˜«
2
Sharting in a crowded room and/or leaving really stinky shits in public toilets. This is the future conservatives want.
6
Really? Sounds a lot like San Francisco to me, except the stinky shits are in the streets.
1
It was a Covid thing that must still be being enforced by some subs. The term has to do with questioning the logic behind lockdowns, mask effectiveness, the lethality/severity of catching covid, and the effectiveness of the MRNA vaccines. When subreddits started doing this I got preemptively banned from a whole slew of subreddits over the course of like a week. Just because is was active in subreddits like conservative and lockdownskeptics
10
Any sub that does shit like this should be shut down for breaking the "Mod with Integrity" rule Reddit has
1
Reddit would lose 90% of it's users overnight if that rule was actually followed. I didn't even know it existed until I read your comment and checked
1
Yeah, you right... But maybe... Maybe we need that Purge that E-Con Musk has been promising.
1
Then r/conservative would be shut down too
1
Thing is, I don't really care as much about explicit political subs banning people to preserve the space for the people who the sub was made for. r/conservative has an argument for wanting to preserve conservative discussion and any leftist political subs has the same argument. That's not how I'd run a subreddit but I understand it. What gets me is when I'm banned from something like a funny cat sub because the mods don't like that one time I talked about how a $50 minimum wage is the dumbest shit I've ever heard.
1
Lol, y'all always have an excuse to not follow your own rules "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
1
My comment actually explicitly endorses an equal application of a rule in a facially neutral way across any type of political sub. But don't let a silly thing like reading comprehension get in the way of whatever the hell it is you are going on about.
1
Explain to me how what you replied is applicable to what you replied to. I'm a little stupid
1
Hardly *a rule for thee not for me* when he says both left and right subs can make that argument
1
There’s the problem: you don’t actually know what equality is and you wouldn’t want it if you did.
1
... Not complaining.
1
If they are doing similar shit, then yes they should too.
1
Yeah, and? Integrity is universal. Lack of it is universally bad. Gotta smite all the corruption, boy-o.
9
I am starting to hate this far-left echo chamber platform more and more everyday. I am on the verge of deleting my account.
9
If you find a good alternative to reddit please lmk
1
4chan
1
Gotta balance out reddit by using iFunny. Extreme left and extreme right = centered, right? 😂
1
Is there VIGOROUS debate?
1
i use 9gag time to time but its really for memes
1
Twitter is a now a wasteland of righties lying to themselves if that’s what you’re looking for.
1
I am right there with you and I think a lot more people are feeling this way. Its all so tiring
1
You just gotta unsubscribe from and mute those circlejerk subs. It will dramatically improve your Reddit experience.
1
Keep it, so you can keep an eye on them and their mentality.
1
Im on the far left and same thing happening. I just don’t care lol
7
One of us! One of us! LOL. Wear it like a badge, man
5
Freedom of association, just not on reddit.
1
conservatives dont believe in Freedom of association
1
I believe you're free to not associate with me. Enjoy your life somewhere else.
1
>I believe you're free to not associate with me. Enjoy your life somewhere else. more bullshit
5
Everybody is equal, my big brother told me
5
This stupid bot banned me from justiceserved for my "participation" in the joerogan sub, which was a single post making fun of the people who listen to Joe Rogan. I don't even subscribe to r/joerogan.
1
Same happened to me  I told the mod they were a silly  dummy or something like that ya know something super safe but really annoying and cringy to read  and that's how  my last account got banned 
1
Every time that sub shows up on my feed as suggested, the post is shitting on Joe. It happened so much I just assumed that sub was anti-Joe. So it’s ironic you got banned.
4
The mods at that place are total trash.
4
Ironic that the subreddit that actively celebrated people dying from COVID for YEARS, cheering their deaths and posting news articles jerking each other off over obituaries..... Bans you for "celebrates or glorifies biological terrorism" It's peak fucking irony. 
4
Coward liberals always hiding behind their lies
3
I'd rather have biological terrorism than restrictions on speech.
1
This is a braindead take 
1
Being you offered no argument I would agree, yours is a braindead take.
1
There's no argument needed your nuts pal if you think terrorism is cool   I get it you don't care as long as you can say what you want I wouldn't be surprised if you said you'd rather have child sexual abuse material  than restrictions on free speech you an absolutist right
1
I'm actually an American contrarian centrist and while your brain might grind trying to understand it, will take reasoned arguments. But no argument has ever been presented reasonably that can argue that anything but unfettered speech is a core human right. Also I don't think you understand what that sub is referring to when they say biological terrorism.
2
How FACIST.. uncanny.
1
Please explain how this is nationalist
1
Why?
1
Because you said it was fascist and that's a requirement of fascism...
1
That's regarded.....
2
Can we play just have Reddit go paid so these neck beards all get fired.
2
The corruption is unrootable at this point. Frankly idk why im even here
2
Ahahaha good for you getting in that last word!
2
Lol! "Biological terrorism". What a bunch of bitches.
1
Another option for reviewing removed content is your ***Rev***eddit [user page](https://www.reveddit.com/y/C!h!a!o!s!F!l!a!m!e!7!2?all=true). The [real-time extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/direct/) alerts you when a moderator removes your content, and the [linker extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/linker) provides [buttons](https://i.imgur.com/0BAImPq.png) for viewing removed content. There's also a [shortcut for iOS](https://www.icloud.com/shortcuts/62bc7570613c42cb8b851fad264136df). The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to remove this comment. This bot only operates in authorized subreddits. To support this tool, [post it on your profile](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) and select ['pin to profile'](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png).   [^(F.A.Q.)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/f.a.q./) ^| [^(v/reveddit)](https://www.reveddit.com/v/reveddit/-redirect) ^| [^(support me)](https://www.reveddit.com/about/donate) ^| [^(share)](https://old.reddit.com/user/me/submit?title=See+which+comments+of+yours+have+been+removed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reveddit.com%2Fabout%2F) ^& [^('pin to profile')](https://i.imgur.com/uq9AGMV.png)
1
[removed]
1
Shitlibs sure hate capitalism until "b-b-but private company!" Allows them to censor political discourse
1
That's because most shitlibs are crypto-commies at heart.
1
 This sounds like the political equivalent of techno-babble
1
They obviously do not know what biological terrorism is
 Just another leftist circle jerk sub like most of this site.
1
What’s the point of that sub? Worth being my next ban?
1
You have to decide whether you're going to let some rando mod who puts out a bot mod to dictate what sub you're going to subscribe or comment in. I got a ban myself and I unsubscribed because they aren't that important.
1
Biological terrorism? I eagerly await that convoluted definition.
1
I thought they couldn’t do these auto bans anymore since Reddit took away all their toys?
1
Those subs must cleanse the ranks and maintain a final plan for purity!
1
It's true. We don't need those diseased minds spreading their disease amongst the decent folk.
1
Sounds like China.
1
Seems fine. conservatives love private companies except when they do things they don't like. Contextual freedom lol.
1
I got banned by that sub even though I was trolling the conservatives. Furthermore, I’d never heard of that sub before.
1
They only want fellow closed minded morons in that sub
1
What on earth is biological terrorism!?
1
Lol wtf!
1
Reddit moderators are like small town cops. Trying to grow a chin.
1
My ban from that sub was due to being in a sub about bolo ties. Mods are clearly bolophobic.
1
As a Muslim American and spectator- this is the problem that I think conservatives are right to call out. In this effort of equality there is this perverse and intentional desire to control and regulate, religious liberty is definitely under attack by the left and if successful, they would restrict it as much as Canada. Also, there is a censorship of “offensive” ideology- but the problem with these censorships is that they will always be subjective, they will always change, and once you allow the censorship to occur, you will never regain control of it.
1
Yes. And it always starts the same way. There is a war or emergency. Then is spreads to people telling jokes about the president or saying the don’t believe govt statistics, or quoting something the govt said before the official narrative changed.
1
Doing this is against reddit TOS, but they won't enforce the rule in these subs because it's (D)ifferent.
1
I've gotten banned from certain subs because I had posted in r/conservative, but I'm ALSO banned from r/conservative because all of my postings there were just to point out what dumbasses they all were
1
"Biological terrorism" đŸ€Ł
1
Going on my resume
1
I mean conservatives are wrong about uhh most things; but I don’t think that biological terrorism is something they worship, Covid doesn’t fall under that at all btw
1
replace "conservatives" with "liberalists" and you've got something.
1
Pretty sure not liking abortions and prosecuting people who would get them is pretty fucking wrong.
1
Yikes.. Reddits future is so unbelievably fucked man
1
Banned for wrong-think
1
I got banned from majority report for questioning the accuracy of their post; ditto, global warming or something like it,,, Stephan Crane told me to just ignore them and consider it to be a red badge of courage.
1
And the funny part is that r/conservative has been completely neutered for years now. Might as well rename it to r/establishment
1
Why is it that the people constantly whining about being censored are the ones espousing hateful bullshit. Maybe the original comment made wasn't a justification for the ban, but the behavior in these subs afterwards makes it clear that wasn't the only reason many of you were banned.
1
You don’t think being banned just for belonging to another sub is all kinds of bat shit crazy?
1
I mean, a little, but if that sub worships a rapist who attempted to overthrow an election and assassinate his political opposition (as well as his own VP) and bans anyone who says anything remotely critical about said sycophant, then yeah, I'd say it's pretty much fine. It's funny, but r/conservative being so ban happy has made it so that anyone who is a member can be identified as an extremist
1
Who did that? Was it the same guy who takes bribes from China and Ukraine through his crackhead son?
1
Lol, Trump ACTUALLY took bribes from the Saudis (the ones who did 9/11 and murder journalists) but y'all don't care about that because you're obsessed with Hunter Biden's literal penis. You'd rather back America's enemies than admit you might be wrong about something Can't make this shit up
1
Democrats are our enemies. I don’t back them.
1
This is why people are tired of conservatives. You're all just hateful. It's a core tenant. You hate Americans and love Russians. You're not a patriot, you're a nationalist.
1
No. Lefties are the most hare filled people on the planet. They are just horrible people.
1
Wow
1
It’s shadier than that. They ban people just for commenting in that sub. Like, I’m a liberal and r/conservative randomly showed up in my feed, so I made a snarky comment and got banned by r/justiceserved, which I didn’t even know about, much less agreed to the terms of that sub. (Ironically, I didn’t get banned by r/conservative.) Incidentally, I got banned by r/whitepeopletwitter, another sub I never joined, for posting in here. Some of my fellow liberals need to learn how not to make enemies out of people who agree with them.
1
Thing is, it doesn’t matter what you say, that sub automatically bans you for posting in r/conservative. Like, even if you’re trolling r/conservative. Which is bullshit.
1
The irony is, I bet a lot of people on the Conservative sub are only there to see what's being said and if it's as bad as social media makes them out to be, myself included. I only subscribe to the Conservative sub because I hate being told what I "should" think about someone/something and I want to see and engage for myself. It's wild how hostile reddit is to critical thought.
1
Biological terrorism (conservatism) lmao. Remove these fucktards from Reddit altogether.
1
Commenting in conservative subreddit is a great way to filter your experience without having to do anything.
1
It's kind of wild to complain about a sub, while supporting one of the lot censored subs on Reddit. Conversations is notorious for pedantic and ridiculous bans even amongst right leaning individuals.
1
That’s pretty cringe mods
1
Cant wait to short the reddit IPO and drive it to insolvency
1
What is “biological terrorism”?
1
đŸ€ĄđŸŒŽ
1
Typical hyperprogs
1
Biological terrorism wtf you farted on their face or what lmao
1
Funny that the left screams so much about the right being bad, but the left is censoring free speech and persecuting anyone who dares think slightly different than them. These cults make themselves.
1
I got banned for the same thing!
1
That’s insane, even if you participate with a opposing opinion you’ll get banned? I love a good counter argument and debate. So I’ll get banned from places for discussing? Ngl this app is the personification of dictatorship
1
Nobody cares
1
You apparently did enough to post.
1
https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/s/YHfsk9fPLv
1
You did enough to not only comment, but reply to a comment about it with the same comment.
1
https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/s/l4l9WD5z8Y
1
https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/s/p4MUgxfgMN
1
And yet you’re here crying about it.
1
Isn't that what everyone who posts here does?
1
Getting angry because people out there have strict definitions for things isn’t an appropriate response.
1
Happened to me. Ironically, I just posted on there to troll and didn’t get banned by them.
1
AND, I got banned by r/whitepeopletwitter (which I never joined) for posting in here. Way to make enemies out of people who agree with you.
1
The world according to reddit is a hysterical leftist's wet dream. George Floyd is a martyred religious figure, COVID is picking off people left and right while the rest of us don't care, Kyle Rittenhouse lurks in every shadow waiting for black children to rattle their lunchboxes too loudly. If anybody tries to confront their irrational fears with statistics or a different perspective it immediately gets ripped down. It's insanity. On the bright side, acting like that in real life has consequences, so they can't really be that nuts in the end.
1
Whatever mod did this deserves to lose their account.
1
Yeah well I got banned from Conservative because they don't love...shocked face...non conservative ideas in there.
1
Mf get your hands off their meat and stay away if you want to not see that sort of stuff. If you are a liberal and go in there wanting to cause problems then yeah I hope you get banned. Same thing if you’re a conservative trying to go into idk r/liberal
1
So STAY in your echo chamber is your advice? Solid.
1
No of course not but I’m saying, don’t try to cause trouble in there. If they banned you for simply voicing a different opinion in there and not trying to cause trouble yeah fuck them. I’m not saying to just stay in one place with no other political opinions.
1
And I was making fun of your username and now I see it seems like I’m a dick
1
No!
1
Report the mod for harassment.
1
Good
1
Good that he got banned because he was in r/conservative?
1
Brah, have you looked at r/conservative ? Those people are nuts.
1
Conservativism is somehow biological terrorism???
1
“I’m mad because r/judticeserved served justice”
1
Your comment really showed them what they were missing by expressing their freedom of association.
1
FAFO
1
r/justiceserved mods are the biggest pussies on reddit
1
"Biological terrorism"? That's a new one. Is that when someone says there's only 2 sexes? LOL.
1
Awh poor baby.
1
When you change the definitions, everything becomes justifiable. So they redefine conservative as "glorifying biological terrorism". The left is doing the same thing in the real world. It's a common tactic of authoritarianism.
1
Your under the impression that the title of a subreddit is any indicator of the character or quality of the subreddit in question or its leadership and mod team. No offense to this subreddit intended (never been in here before), but remember, these subreddits are titled and ran by PEOPLE with their own opinions... and what should really terrify you? They are all redditors as well.
1
I got the same thing from the same sub for talking shit about Ben Shapiro on his sub. The mods at justice severed are limp wristed sissies who think the alt-right will just magically go away if they are ignored. I disagree, and feel like you actually have to fight back against the hateful morons. The lose potential allies in the fight against the alt-right, by not allowing anyone to push back against them. Fuck that whole mod team acting like the brown shirts will leave them alone because they didn't let people say mean things to their face about them. Cowards.
1
I just got banned from whitepeopletwitter for posting the above comment. Fucking snowflakes.
1
What if we just started a sub and kept specific liberals out. Nothing off the table in what could be said. Like the oppo of every Reddit sub
1
It’s hilarious to me that Reddit wants to launch an IPO. Good fucking luck with that. Excluding half the potential user base for their legitimate political views while forcing the other half to adhere to a very narrow set of views is not going to be a good business model.
1
I got permanently banned from /r/therightcantmeme for not being a communist. Seriously.
1
Good lol l
1
This type shit is very unhealthy for Reddit. If you were to create a different sub R-JusticeServed2, I'd join.
1
Reddit censors are ridiculous. Say anything that isn’t liberal and you get banned.
1
r/boringdystopia
1
sounds fair
1
Welcome to the reddit echo chamber
1
Mods are the HOA of Reddit. Same kind of people in both.
1
Freedom of association is pretty amazing, isn't it?
1
Saying you (R) will get you banned on about 99% of reddit subs.
1
lol, these dumb fucks banned me for defending trans people in r/JoeRoganExperience They said I was driving engagement in that sub that promotes hate. Even though I was defending the people being hated on
 So now I can still engage in the sub they don’t like but I can’t engage in their sub. Meaning the sub they don’t like will continue to grow while they purposely limit users who can use their sub. Which seems really counter productive. Can’t talk sense into a Reddit mod though.
1
Reddit sadly is an authoritarian bolshevik shithole powered by woke r3tarded mods but still its fun from time to time
1
Being conservative means you promote "Biological terrorism"? For what, letting nature do its thing with no action of your own? Wtf.
1
Good conservatives should be shunned from society for having abhorrent and shit views.
1
Yeap, I got banned because I wrote a comment in r/conservative when Trump got his mugshot.
1
Welcome to Reddit. I was banned from one sub merely for commenting on a post in a different sub.
1
what is biological terrorism?
1
I’m guessing it’s going to end out being the next replacement for racism.
1
Dont feel bad op they banned me too. My response was thanking them for banning me so i didnt have to mute it. Told them i thought it was hilarious and to enjoy thier echo chamber. Reddit banned me 3 days for hate speech lol.
1
It’s like they don’t know that literally half the people walking around the US identify as conservative
 that’s a lot of terrorists according to these dumbasses
1
start your own subredit
1
Dahek is biological terrorism?
1
Happened to me a year ago; all I posted was a link to information refuting a post. Got banned for "participating".
1
I hate conservatives more than most people here and even I hate this bs. What if I’m in their sub trying to get folks to see reason? A blanket ban for participating in a certain sub is just dumb to me
1
Ok what biological terrorism is going on here? I have missed the anthrax posts or something?
1
I mean, r/conservative is probably the most ban happy sub on the site, they ban anyone who doesn't use right wing vernacular or participate in a number of leftist subs
1
Ridiculous. I got banned from a Fashion sub (where I was always kind and helpful), because I subscribed to a fit women sub. Apparently being into fitness is harmful towards those interested in fashion (even though I never once commented in the fitness sub). Makes my blood boil.
1
I was banned from justice served as well for my comments breaking the rules- when I pointed out I never commented and tried to get an answer why they had reddit mods ban me for 3 days
1
Are you banned from WPT as well? If not, you might as well collect the badges.
1
I got banned from r/conservative for not going along with their insanity. Do you guys care about that?
1
Lol, y'all always have an excuse to not follow your own rules "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
1
ROFL, r/conservative bans people all the time
1
You told them to go fuck themselves and you didn’t get a temp or perm ban from Reddit? You got off light. Every time some cunt mod bans me from their shitty sub because they can’t take a joke, if I reply to them they report me for harassment and Reddit immediately bans me for a week and never overturns it. Reddit is utter shit.
1
So, the subreddit name is an oxymoron!
1
I got banned from white people twitter for being in that sub.lol
1
Man that’s sad lol what a bunch of pussays
1
Dontcha know? Being a conservative on Reddit is a crime against humanity. Fuck's sake. I'd call myself centre-left but even when I was farther to the left, this mass outrage at conservatives just EXISTING online pissed me the fuck off. Doesn't matter if you're an alt-right QAnon extremist wingnut or just someone who holds conservative ideals, apparently both of those things are just as bad and justify being blacklisted from most subreddits. These people who look into people's post history just to find out if they believe in something they don't are legitimately mentally ill.
1
[removed]
1
That’s so dumb lmao. What if you go on that sub to debate with people and what not? I’m in subs I don’t agree with just because I think hearing all perspectives is important.
1
Lmao get fukt
1
The conservative sub banned me because I dared criticize Herschel Walker a couple years ago. They are softies too.
1
Groups that are aligned to one political party will just separate us further. I remember being biased, I am slowly creeping away from it. Hopefully the government will treat us differently if we all work together instead of insulting and shooting at each other (USA)
1
That ain't censorship. That is just being kicked out of a random club.
1
Is this sub just complaining about getting banned in other subs?
1
Didn't you know just reading r conservative turns you into an evil right wing monster. Serves you right! /s reddit is pretty fucking done by November.
1
There sure are a lot of r/Liberal subs with different names.
1
It’s totally insane to autoban people for participating in other subs. I can’t believe Reddit allows the practice.
1
Looks like justice was served.
1
No wrongthink!
1
I don’t get what the problem is? Aren’t these privately created subs? If they don’t want someone there then they don’t want someone there.
1
Me for commenting on some joe Rogen post about Putin's latest murder
-2
The conservative subreddit isn’t exactly a bastion of free speech lol.
6
I think they have to censor so their sub can remain a conservative space. If they didn’t it would just be another leftist echo chamber like r/politics and that sub isn’t supposed to just be about a certain left leaning side.
3
Or it’s just hypocritical, but we’ll have to stop here
the crazies are already downvoting lol. Have a good one!
1
Tells us whats hyprocritical..
1
Shouldn’t a subreddit that complains about Reddit “censorship” refrain from censoring its own sub? I don’t want to get into some crazy downvote game over politics though. Let’s just agree to disagree. Have a good one!
1
Its just a community that resides in a site where 80% if not more of the user base detests their views. Even now, with all the censoring you have brigading going on, imagine if all limits were lifted,the sub would be overrun in hours. Compare it with /r/politics with even a name that implies impartiality, yet they censure as well if not more, despite not needing to do so since there is zero risk of the subreddit being overrun by the minority of non-liberals in reddit.
1
This isn't even true, y'all just have a persecution fetish
1
Want to specify whats not true?
1
The post isn’t claiming the conservative sub is a free speech hub. What’s happening is OP was auto banned from a sub for simply taking part in a different sub. The conservative sub doesn’t even go that far.
1
Yes it does, lol
1
How convenient. "Your echo chambers are bad, but ours must be preserved at all cost"
1
Your point might make sense if the politics subs was supposed to be an echo chamber. If it was supposed to be one sided. It isn’t but it is modded that way and there are way more left leaning Redditors that participate in that sub to keep it that way. . R/ conservative would turn into a version of that.
1
All conservatives subs have to self censor or risk loosing the sub. you'll see it happen to un/low-moderated subs that have conservatives. They get brigaded by people pretending to be conservative saying the most vile shit until the sub goes poof.
1
"Your echo chambers are bad but ours must be preserved at all costs"
-3
Sounds like justice was served.. YEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
-4
Imagine being so soft that you can get over this after 42 days lmao
4
I’m actually pretty hard😘
1
Clap clap clap  Wow what humor look everyone he's saying he's sexually aroused wow what a jape  wow amazing good job 
1
Conservatives stopped maturing around middle school. It's why they never got past the "ME ME ME" thing
1
Couldn't tell
-10
You know that r/conservative mods are some of the most ban-happy people on Reddit? You’re not a victim.
8
What does the OP have to do with the mods of r/Conservative? It’s supposed to be his fault how they conduct themselves? Foh.
-6
He’s a member of another group that censors people while complaining about being censored. OP is an obvious hypocrite.
6
Being a member of any group means zero. I follow groups I don’t agree with simply because I don’t wish to live in an echo chamber like some seem to on this website.
1
But r/conservative is literally an echo chamber. You can’t disagree with anyone and you must be a certain kind of conservative. OP is a hypocrite to be complaining about being censored when he’s fine with others being censored.
7
What is not computing with you? Being a member is not indicative of a belief. Subreddits shouldn’t be banning people for simply participating in another subreddit if the Redditor is following TOS, otherwise. He’s not the mod making the rules. He’s an end user, Redditing. Banning people based on their beliefs sounds kind of
I dunno
fascist?
3
Yes. R/conservative is fascist. We’re on the same page. You and I agree on this.
1
I’d say the same about somewhere like the liberal cess pool that is whitepeopletwitter.
1
Ok. You agree that r/conservative is fascist. I don’t care about that sub.
3
You act as if I banned them but besides that what proof have you on your end? Let’s see it bud
1
Are you claiming that r/conservative doesn’t ban a ton of people without rationale or reason? That’s either naive or disingenuous. I think you’re arguing in bad faith buddy.
2
Show me proof that they’ve banned someone like they did me. Let’s see it, I got my proof let’s see yours.
1
Sweetie. You’re really saying conservatives don’t ban people? Don’t be a silly goose.
3
Difference between banning someone and having a bot that bans you for participating in an opposite political party sweetie pie.
1
Rule 1 on Reddit; never ask someone on the left for proof
1
Censorship is censorship. Surely you understand that, right? Seems like you're making excuses for censorship that you like. Hypocrites.
1
Lmao that’s a lefty for ya. Never wrong and always making excuses for their party
1
Not a lefty sweetheart. But you keep up your whining and victim complex. It’s the language of losers.
1
Thanks for telling me about the language you speak.
1
Is that you saying “I know you are but what am I?” Jesus Christ. Democrats have had that White House for 12 out of the last 16 years. I’m so tired of losing!
1
If you’re tired you should do something about it and quit whining. Is this that language of losers?
1
None of what you just said made sense.
1
Ignorance eh?
1
Oh man I just looked at your recent posts. A janitor who lives in the same house with his ex and has no friends. No wonder you’re like this. I’m sorry man.
1
Lmao had to find some fuel because I outwhitted you
1
You misspelled outwitted.
1
Thank you teacher! I’ll have to do some extra study lessons with your wife
1
lol good one! You’ve certainly outwitted me!
1
Thanks I really do try teach.
1
Chewsday innit?
1
What the fuck, dude?
1
Don’t censor me
1
I’m not going to, you just sound like a prick.
1
The janitor thing wasn’t appropriate. I’m fine with everything else.
1
I am too. Argue away.
1
Banning a troll that isn’t contributing to the theme of the sub is part of the point of having mods. Doesn’t matter what the sub is about. If a Chevy themed sub gets a troll that just talks about ford and insults the users of the sub
I would expect the mods to take action. But pre-banning someone just for participating on a sub somebody doesn’t like is just idiotic and is already framing an echo-chamber
which most of the far-left subs have been seen doing such pre-banning. Seems like you have the rules-for-thee mentality
which kinda makes you the hypocrite, skippy.
6
They don’t ban you outright for participating in other subs “they” don’t like

1
Sure they do. And they also ban you for a million other made up reasons.
6
Someone has a hate boner
 go outside and touch some fucking grass kid
1
That was a phenomenal response from someone who’s online complaining about other people getting banned from subreddits. Do any of you own a mirror?
2
Only one making complaints is you pal
.
1
This sub is just people complaining.
1
Don't waste your time, they aren't capable of critical thought, it's why they're in the biggest echo chamber on Reddit
1
No they don’t? I don’t partake but they don’t ban people automatically for participating in other subs.