21 comments

23
It's not censorship, you idiots. /r/AskHistorians has some of the most stringent requirements for sourcing on reddit and always has incredibly high quality content because of it.
-4
my bad i forgot this was my university's research discussion forum
6
No, it's open to people from all places provided they have the experience and facts to support their point. Read the sub rules.
0
It doesnt matter, you idiot. I bet they deny things all the time that are actually fact. Who is to say they arent liberally biased like the rest of reddit?
1
http://ceddit.com/ says so
2
It is censorship. When the mods can decide what can and cant be removed it leads to abuse as is evident in this case.
3
>When the mods decide what can and cant be removed Please define moderator
2
r/politicaldiscussion, r/morbidreality, for starters
1
**Here's a sneak peek of [/r/PoliticalDiscussion](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion) using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!** \#1: [In a recent Tweet, the President of the United States explicitly targeted a company because it acted against his family's business interests. Does this represent a conflict of interest? If so, will President Trump pay any political price?](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/5su9ig/in_a_recent_tweet_the_president_of_the_united/) \#2: [Michael Flynn has reportedly resigned from his position as Trump's National Security Advisor due to controversy over his communication with the Russian ambassador. How does this affect the Trump administration, and where should they go from here?](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/5txzyf/michael_flynn_has_reportedly_resigned_from_his/) \#3: [Clinton has won the popular vote, while Trump has won the Electoral College. This is the 5th time this has happened. Is it time for a new voting system?](https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/5c0pqa/clinton_has_won_the_popular_vote_while_trump_has/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)
2
Please define *the role of* a moderator.
1
Certainly not to censor people.
1
Please **define** *the role of* a moderator.
1
My other account is a moderator. I assume its just part of opening up a subreddit. I dont moderate at all because it seems pointless. The subs I created are there so people can do everything they are not allowed to do on reddit such as posting real info, brigading, ranting, etc.
20
I understand how this looks, but allow me to defend /r/askhistorians for a bit. those mods are some of the muat unbiased and well meaning that I'm likely to come across. However the sub is very *very* strict in what comments it allows. This is understood and clearly and civilly communicated by the same mods. The reason it is so strict is that there is a lot of misinformation and vas history floating around, often perpetuated by people who think they know what they're talking about. /r/askhistorians is a place where myths like that are corrected and popular qurstions answered by credible (academic) historians. So they have to be very resolute in deleting false, nonsourced, speculative or vague answers. So I feel that, since this serves a clear purpose in the sub and the mods are completely transparant in how, why, and when they remove content, furthermore the deleting follows a strict set of rules and it seems not partisan and equally enforced to all parties, I would say that this is not censorship, it is curating content.
6
You should get your fucking spelling in order and proof read your comments before you post them, you look like a fucking idiot like this! /rant
3
Hey, don't be so hard on yourself.
1
[deleted]
1
Are they revisionist? thats terrible. What kind of stuff are we talking about, how bad is it? Can you give some examples?
8
How is this censorship? Ask historians is heavily moderated for a good reason
1
[deleted]
1
'History' is only allowed when I agree with what it, not what it was. If historically a group of people did something but now because of social pressures its not acceptable to mention that, you just start hiding it and then eventually those people never did that thing. But they did do that thing and that thing shouldn't be forgotten. To be as unbiased as possible.