76 comments

66
You'll never convince people of bots with Trump examples. Go with evidence of socialist policies being censored. Stuff like Healthcare reform or wikileaks info being down voted.
64
Socialist shit is on the top of reddit all the time
30
"Demokratic Soshuhlism isen't $ocilism!"
5
Well, I mean like, it isn't, because I doubt Norway or Sweden is exactly a socialist country.
11
Couple of shitlibs would like to tell you how Scandinavia is a socialist utopia.
-15
[removed]
9
Alright, tough guy, go have a time out.
-8
[removed]
6
You are really hard-up for attention. So sad.
4
Folks I'm gonna have to set up a perimeter. We got a class 6 Edge Lord here. His edge is so sharp it could damage your delicate liberal sensibilities. Please stand back and let Mr. Galt von Edge here support all of society with his intellect, hard work, and superior ethical system unconstrained by your Christian slave morality. Let us hope he deigns to continue to toil on our behalf, lest society collapse. Please folks, step back, this is serious edge.
-6
[removed]
2
>when you eat the pasta wholeheartedly
1
You should probably come up with a better justification for your shitty comment, that isn't a very good one. Or dont get so triggered over a shitpost. Shaking that hard can't be healthy...your family is worried.
5
They are welfare states if anyone wants to know exactly what they are.
-4
[deleted]
2
Really? Like what?
5
This has to be a joke. Reddit is infested with left wing shit.
53
How about the shitty Documentary that just hit /r/all with 10 comments and a handful of upvotes? Tons of comments talking about botspam and plenty of replies consisting of "just because it's negative against trump doesn't mean it's bots! You can never prove it!".
45
That's funny, cause they were so fucking sure that T_D uses bots, or we're all Russians. 😂 Pathetic shitlibs don't know what they're saying.
4
Or maybe, just maybe, low-intelligence radicals on either side use the same bullshit tactics because nuanced discussion requires more effort than they're able to muster.
16
Weird. We're all about facts over here, and we don't need to censor anybody.
-13
Keep telling yourself that, because empirical evidence suggests otherwise.
15
Like "MUH RUSSIA!" conspiracy? Pft. Kicks rocks.
-12
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH excuse me AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA Holy fucking shit you people are so god damn stupid, so so so god damn stupid.
15
Get back to /politics where this kind of response is welcome. Jezus, so typical. Zero intelligent counter to the obvious abuse going on, just lame derailing attempts, or (as above) outright shit slinging in the face of reasonable objections.
-13
You too fuck boy
11
Look how mad you are, snowflake. 😂
-6
Haha BAZOINKA M8!
8
Did you have a stroke?
0
Haha le xD pwned!!
1
Seek help.
0
You got me! Lol! Snowflake! Major pwn bro xD
1
Say, "You broke me".
1
I have crippling depression and a problem with alcohol, I broke myself homie. Now scurry along and go talk to someone who cares snowflake.
1
How pathetic. I broke you. Thanks for letting me know.
0
Lmao ok bud have a good day god bless
1
> Now scurry along and go talk to someone who cares snowflake.
-2
[removed]
17
Read the rules, then, cock gobbler.
-2
[removed]
11
You're the one who replied to me. Congratulations, you played yourself.
-5
TIL replying = triggered. I would argue that the one that's tossing out personal insults because someone insulted their favorite sub is the triggered one. You can believe that all the youtube videos and infographics that are posted on T_D are undeniable facts (they're not), but you can't possibly be stupid enough to ignore that it's one of the most heavily censored subreddits right?
8
Where in my comment did I say, "triggered"? Don't try too hard next time. Read the T_D's rules and try again.
-1
> Weird. We're all about facts over here, and we don't need to censor anybody. Okay, I've read T_D's rules (again). >This forum is for Trump supporters only. If you have questions about our president, our way of thinking or other discussion questions, post on r/AskThe_Donald, where we will gladly answer. This forum is NOT for that. They admit they censor anyone who does not outright express support for Trump, even if what they post is just statistics or to encourage discussion with the other side. AskT_D is a good idea for a subreddit to accompany T_D, the problem is it's extremely rare for a user trying to defend T_D's positions to post verifiable facts. *And* they also tend to censor discussion.
2
**Here's a sneak peek of /r/AskThe_Donald using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/top/?sort=top&t=all) of all time!** \#1: [MEGATHREAD: Reddit admins remove leading moderators of The_Donald.](https://np.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/comments/6c7zuc/megathread_reddit_admins_remove_leading/) \#2: [HOW TO: Red Pill Someone - A 13,600+ Worded Cheat Sheet - Version 1.0](https://np.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/comments/507acz/how_to_red_pill_someone_a_13600_worded_cheat/) \#3: [SYRIA MEGATHREAD: "U.S. Launches Missiles at Syrian Base After Chemical Weapons Attack."](https://np.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/comments/63xmbm/syria_megathread_us_launches_missiles_at_syrian/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/6l7i0m/blacklist/)
1
1. So I didn't mention the word "triggered"? Got it. 2. Good job. Here's a pat on your head. 3. List these "extremely rare" occasions.
1
[deleted]
1
[deleted]
0
1.Let's argue semantics! >Congratulations, you played yourself. Said by you in response to someone who called you triggered, I inferred from context that you meant he was the one that's triggered. Perhaps I was incorrect but I don't think it's a big leap to see how I came to that conclusion. 2. Thanks! although I'm not sure why that deserves it's own point on your list. 3. I think u/sneakpeekbot has some good examples already posted in this thread. All three of those links contain some interesting and thought provoking discussion and facts. The problem is those unbiased facts are buried within obviously biased youtube videos and twitter infographics that are in no way verifiable.
1
1. "I inferred" Naw, really? You sure? 2. You can read. It's never said it wasn't a safe space as it is for a specific reason. 3. You downvoted that bot, too. Poor bot helping your pathetic attempt at trying to insult me.
0
[deleted]
1
Projection. Re-read your first comment, bub. *yawn*
0
Getting sleepy there champ? Maybe a nap will help sharpen your reasoning skills a little. In your original comment you say they don't need to censor, and then you admit that they are a safe space because they censor dissenting content. I know I'm not going to change your mind, it's just baffling to me how you can't make that connection.
8
>it's one of the most heavily censored subreddits right? Holy fuck my sides! TIL removing rule breakers is censorship.
-3
[removed]
7
> differemce TOP KEK You're shit at trying to troll, cuck.
0
Aww and your reply is stuck at correcting a typo hahahahahah quality content. Considering how easy I have you replying to not 1 but 2 comment threads i think i was pretty successful hahah Good job looking like an idiot mate. Stretch a little more though, its a fucking riot to watch you struggle.
35
How'd they figure out it was botted? It fits the general Reddit narrative.
29
I think it's having 65k upvotes but only 200 comments.
18
Seriously? A tiny comment thread with umteen bazillion upvotes doesn't just *look suspicious*, it is obvious abuse of the voting system, completely out of whack with anything like organic voting, and with a deafening silence from the admins. Then there are all the tiny, tiny subs that are abused, with upvotes to a post *FAR above the actual member count*, used to get Shareblue & Co propaganda to the top of /all. They burn one tiny sub and move on to the next. That crap started after the admins put their curated list in as a the default replacement for /all. Both examples of blatant abuse against reddit's (very selectively enforced) rules, go on with full admin support. :(
14
Can't mention ShareBlue by name without getting instantly downvoted It's like they pay people to constantly search comments and posts for terms like ShareBlue or CTR and then report whatever they find to management, who in turn schedules the material for mass downvoting Because they're a bunch of nerd virgins who never see sunlight or have a drink or get laid
16
I don't think any reasonable person could deny that there is botting, and groups that are paid to influence discussion on reddit. But here the mods are taking action against it, as they likely try do with all posts that are manipulated. If they've shown they're doing that there, you have to assume they're at least trying to remedy the problem, and that they found no evidence of such manipulation in many of the top scoring posts, meaning most that upvoted were actual people who didn't like Trump (there are a lot of them).
5
> as they likely try do with ~~all~~ posts that are [*UNDENIABLY*] manipulated. FTFY > you have to assume they're at least trying to remedy the problem Their (corrupt mods) problem, and reddit admin's problem, is that it has become ALL too obvious, and people are getting tired of their blatant shitting on, and selective enforcement of, sub and reddit-wide rules of conduct.
-2
Relevant username.
12
As usual once you strip away the lefts lies you're left with nothing
1
Trump couldn't repeal or replace ACA with full control of both senate and house :-) Trump got cucked by his own party :-)
11
I don't understand... Do they just have hundreds and thousands of accounts just for botting?
27
hundreds of thousands... thousands are all thats needed, if that. Reddit isnt actually that big, especially with upvote engagement. and anyway, its well known people go with the crowd, so by changing it even a little it quite quickly becomes a self upvoting behavior. I.e. just look at someone who has been downvoted even to -1. No matter how nice the post it, or accurate, or in the right area it is always likely to be downvoted to oblivion
5
Shareblue & Co, or various corporate shilling operations, are quite capable of making that -10 with a quickness. MUCH bigger problem than a simple -1. They can downvote a comment to hidden status faster than the comments can be read. Often such brigades result in the more worthy comment being deleted under pressure of the deluge of downvotes. Especially on false-flag posts they were responsible for in the first place, (a common M.O. for these shady organizations).
8
[let's all remember when a small sub about tweets got a non tweet related anti trump post to r/all](https://www.reddit.com/r/political_tweets/comments/6lpt67) yeah, definitley no botting going on here /s
2
Not criticizing, just new to this. How is this evidence of noting? ELI5 because I really don't understand.
1
[deleted]
1
Everyone is botting. In fact it wouldn't even be incomprehensible to me, especially considering how many bots are required for this, if opposing sides ended up hiring the same groups to do their dirty work. You can buy any type of internet karma nowadays-- gb likes, Twitter follows, and apparently Reddit upvotes. That's why it's stupid to get invested in the internet drama at all. Well, that's at least _one reason why_ it's stupid to get invested..
7
Rediculous. Reddit is pretty much owned by Shareblue & Co. This is all too obvious. Just look at the cesspool of disinformation /politics (and now pretty much every other large "news" sub) turned into literally overnight, when CTR got that 6 million dollar budget boost. (CTR, "correct the record" was the propaganda agency now known as Shareblue btw) Political propaganda is a multi-million dollar industry, it does untold damage to so many social media sites, reddit included, as well as the MSM "news" outlets. This propaganda is hugely one-sided: supporting DNC, left, rad-fem, domestic terrorists like antifa and BLM, and very much anti-trump. They rule reddit and so many others. To assert otherwise, to even attempt to assert that the "sides" are in any way comparable, against any clear and objective observation of actual events, is just more propaganda.
1
If you think both sides aren't using propaganda, you're deeply underestimating how much faith people have in their own views. Which given by your ridiculous assessment of the situation, is really ironic because you clearly think your sides virtues means they can do no wrong
1
[deleted]