/r/NoStupidQuestions fields an inquiry about whether Trump cheated on his wife despite this already having been answered. The mods allow every biased, opinionated response as long as it is "Yes, he cheated." Anything saying otherwise or pointing out the hypocrisy of the left is removed.

159    16 Feb 2018 00:26 by u/NorseGodLoki0411

19 comments

6 u/TypicalLibertarian 16 Feb 2018 19:27
The fact that: >Not a single source in this thread, really? was removed is pretty telling. No one is giving a source towards why they believe this or that and a source should be included.
1 u/[deleted] 16 Feb 2018 14:08
[deleted]
1 u/shortmanlongfingers 17 Feb 2018 00:29
Which removed comments didn't either violate rule one or go totally of topic in a back and forth?
2 u/NorseGodLoki0411 [OP] * 17 Feb 2018 00:40
The evidence of censorship lies not only in what was removed, but what was allowed to stay. Removing something because it is in violation of subreddit rules is simply rules enforcement. Take, for example, /r/The_Donald removing many anti Trump posts. They literally have a rule that clearly states that any talk of Trump in a negative light is not allowed. Hence how what they're doing isn't censorship. So if, as another example, /r/news or /r/worldnews made a rule that stated that any post that didn't follow the Liberal agenda was not allowed then the censorship on those subreddit would not be censorship, it'd simply be rules enforcement. The issue here with /r/NoStupidQuestions is that they can't claim any of this was simply rules enforcement since they only removed posts that echoed Conservative sentiments and readily allowed super biased, super Liberal, super opinionated, fact-lacking posts. That's not rules enforcement. It's selective removal to forward an agenda behind the mask of fairness. That's censorship.
2 u/shortmanlongfingers 17 Feb 2018 01:57
So you're saying that it's censorship not because rule violating conservative comments were removed, but because rule violating liberal comments weren't? Why is r/NoStupidQuestions expected to catch every infraction of the rules, and why is it that infractions that they don't remove are because of partiality?
1 u/NorseGodLoki0411 [OP] 17 Feb 2018 02:19
>Why is /r/NoStupidQuestions expected to catch every infraction They're not, they're just expected to not only get the ones that are Conservative views. >and why is it that infractions that they don't remove are because of partiality? Because they're only removing Conservative comments.
1 u/shortmanlongfingers 17 Feb 2018 10:14
but how do you know the conservative comments are removed for being conservative?
1 u/Juicy_Brucesky 21 Feb 2018 19:34
I like the guy saying getting us out of the paris agreement will ruin our economy. If that isn't proof for how dumb these fucking people are, I don't know what is. The Paris agreement was hurting us, not helping us
-31 u/[deleted] 16 Feb 2018 07:14
[deleted]
19 u/Hagbard97 16 Feb 2018 11:49
Downvoted != removed, dipshit. But I wouldn't expect a person that thinks the Internet is for cat pictures to have the brain power necessary to handle the above distinction...
-21 u/StonehengeMan 16 Feb 2018 12:01
r/iamverysmart Cheers! :)
10 u/GlipGlop69 16 Feb 2018 14:51
Not even close.
-69 u/RiseoftheTrumpwaffen 16 Feb 2018 01:38
Don’t worry you have t_D to push your narrative and hide in your safe space
6 u/[deleted] 16 Feb 2018 01:51
🤔
46 u/NorseGodLoki0411 [OP] 16 Feb 2018 01:53
The narrative of "moderators shouldn't use their elevated rights to censor a subreddit to steer the conversation?" That's all I'm pushing here. Edit: Or maybe the narrative you're referencing is "moderators shouldn't break their own subreddit rules."
19 u/p3n4nc3 16 Feb 2018 02:15
Cool...a troll.
2 u/jvardrake 16 Feb 2018 16:33
Or just a raging douchebag.
22 u/JonRedcorn862 16 Feb 2018 05:02
You guys are so fucking lame. You can't even come up with your own insults. It's so pathetic. It's not a safe space it's just the only place you won't get banned for being a conservative.
1 u/[deleted] 16 Feb 2018 12:35
[deleted]