13 comments

13
It's hard to believe that even the current level of censorship in r/canada is not enough for the far left, which is why they have formed r/onguardforthee, which advocates for even harsher censorship in r/canada. They claim the canada sub has been "taken over by white supremacists"...
-1
Do you disagree it has been?
5
Even at a casual glance it's perfectly clear r/canada isn't white supremacist, natsoc, altright, whatever else is being claimed.
7
Must've been the talk about Vermont Maple syrup. Source - am Canadian.
3
[removed]
24
How do you figure that? r/Canada(as all Canadian sub's) routinely throw around substance free threads and posts, and bitching about conservatives are a daily, if not hourly, event. This is clearly yet another example of one sided moderation, and someone being censored due to political leanings. State that Harper was a bad signer - upvoted to the moon. Call him a sweater-vest wearing bozo, and you are an enlightened soul. Call Mike Harris evil and you are a mod on r/Ontario, state that between McGuinty and Wynne Ontario is effectively bankrupted and you'll comment will be removed for being anti-lgbt. Trudeau, like his idiot father before him, has done such harm to the country that it would take decades to repair it, if it is even possible to repair it. All thanks to SJW's, and if SJW's don't like being called SJW's, then maybe they should be in better control of their emotions. However, if they could do that they wouldn't be SJW's in the first place.
-9
[removed]
2
Honestly your post title isn't much different than what you call virtue signalling, just on the other end of the spectrum.
17
Awesome, let's make both types of virtue signalling a bannable offense since you think they are the same. I can get behind that.
0
Meh. Was just an observation. Don't think he shouldve had the post deleted. Just don't think it's very constructive.
2
That's not even particularly mean criticism.
1
lol gj
0
Honestly, the Canada subreddit is pretty politically balanced.