29 comments

22
Holy shit. Canada needs to take a good long look at their legal system.
13
At least four people got permanently banned by the mods over that thread. Censorship has taken over our country's subreddit.
0
Start a new one... /r/mapleleaf or something. Or just /r/canadauncensored
3
There are already multiple other subs created in response to this. /r/CanadaPolitics for the left and pedantic, /r/Metacanada for the right and pissed off, and /r/OnGuardForThee for the people who experience misplaced outrage and are confused about the world because they have been struck by a mental illness known as "extreme liberalism". Creating another sub isn't the point. The Canada subreddit is supposed to reflect views of Canadians. It does not do that. I don't mind if CanadaPolitics or OnGuardForThee censors me. It's pedantic and obnoxious, but I don't have any major qualms about it. Those subs were created to serve a certain particular circle jerk. They can have their sandbox. But Canada is my country. I am a Canadian citizen. I have just as much a right to speak in *my country's subreddit* as any other Canadian. Period. They should be forced to change their name. I suggest /r/TrudeauCircleJerk might be more appropriate. Or /r/CanadaCensored. Those would be more of an apt description. There is censorship in our country's subreddit, and it is absolutely reprehensible.
2
Yeah I'm with you buddy. It sucks, but reddit itself is inherently leftist leaning so I don't think you're going to get that.
1
Yeah, well. That's a problem. That's exactly what I'm talking about.
2
We now have /r/unbiasedcanada
2
nice!
1
Tell your friends...tell your enemies.
-5
Didn't Canada recently legalize bestiality?
-6
Imo if the animals the one that's mounting, then it should be legal. If the animal is humping u clealry they like it otherwise they wouldn't be. But penatration is inhumane Edit: ok y would a dog hump u until he cums, if he wasn't happy? U can't force a dog to fuk u.
4
/r/EvenWithContext
6
Let's just.. not fuck animals. Plus you can't properly gauge consent from an animal anyway. I mean a dog has limited intellectual capacity, it can't properly make it's own choices. Compare it to humans, like let's say you decide to have sex with someone with down syndrome who also has limited intellectual capacity and cannot properly make decisions for themselves overall.. see what i'm getting at? It's just not an ethical thing to do. I'm not sure why you would but even if you have the desire too just don't.
0
I don't, I don't want to, but think about it. Why would a dog mount u and start thrusting back and forth and why would it become hard if it didn't want to?
-15
The comment isn't supporting pedophilia. He's just saying do your own research. That ruling is fucked up either way.
32
They're obstructing the spreading of information on a known pedophile not getting labeled as such. That's censorship and suppression of something that everyone in the world should know about and be outraged over. That's support of pedophilia. It's an action that will help a pedophile to continue to be a pedophile by ensuring more people don't hear about it. It's support of pedophilia.
-7
Most of the comments I saw that were deleted don't provide anything of value beyond "do your own research". Obstructing the spreading of information is a hyperbolic way of looking at what is happening. There was one deleted comment that gave contact information to write and request an appeal. My point is -- They are deleting comments because they're trying to keep what they deem as civility and I disagree with the comments being deleted. But that doesn't make this mod pro-pedo man. Jfc.
8
Whatever the post was it won't load for me. What happened? Is there a news article?
9
The mods have locked the thread https://np.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/9rh5uk/court_says_pedophilia_does_not_apply_because/e8i6xbw They are censoring the information coming out of /r/Canada.
-7
Reddit wide rules disallow doxing of any kind. All of those comments your thinking of are breaking those rules there is no censorship here they have to delete those otherwise the sub would get banned
13
He's a public servant who is meant to be contacted by the public for them to show their disagreement. It's part of his position. Yes, comments calling for the judge to be killed are most definitely against all manner of rules, but that's a small fraction of what was deleted.
-12
Reddit wide rules state all doxing whether for legitimate reasons or not is not allowed the mods made the only decision they're allowed to make essentially. It sucks but that's the admins fault at that point
11
Contacting a public servant isn't doxxing. So this isn't doxxing of any kind. Thus it's perfectly ok. In the cause of coming out strongly anti-pedophilia, I'd expect the mods to fight to be firm on that point.
-10
Yes it is, if you are posting any information AT ALL about a person whether they are a public or private person then that user is doxing it does not matter the context or political affiliation if you post contact info about some one irl that is breaking the reddit wide rule there is no if ands or buts about it the admins have been very obvious about this in the past
11
Reddit rules state: >Content is prohibited if it is personal and confidential information They even go on to say: >Public figures can be an exception to this rule, such as posting professional links to contact a congressman or the CEO of a company. https://www.reddithelp.com/en/categories/rules-reporting/account-and-community-restrictions/posting-someones-private-or-personal
8
Is it doxxing to say that Donald Trump lives at the White House? Of course not. It's not a rule that should be applied 100% of the time.
5
Nonsense. This wasn't doxxing. This was censorship.
5
And then he locked the thread and permanently banned at least four users for the most egregious of reasons. The mods in /r/Canada are engaging in censorship.
-4
Being a tool is not the same as being pro pedo. The fuck. Illogical as fuck conclusions.