According to the article, it's possible this may not be censorship, but we'll only know once there's an actual official statement. >Reached by PJ Media, Professor Starr (who teaches at the University of Michigan) suggested her article may not have been censored, but rather, that USC stopped paying for access to the particular article. However, USC officials did not give that as a response when I asked about censorship of the article, and have yet to provide any further explanation.

> The school’s spokesman claimed I couldn’t see the article because I didn’t have a USC student library login. Yeah . . . that's a good one