Guess they got worried people would start realizing that the point isn't to actually interview people and have good journalism, but instead be a racist piece of shit. Best part is, when the guy tells her "I can't have 'white privilege,' I'm black" she immediately says she was "given wrong information." So you're told someone is white and you immediately judge them based on that? Don't we fire journalists for being super racist? Hmmmmmmm.....
The mods said the story got axed by the auto-moderator and it just took them a min to approve it.
It's been re-instated already. No malicious censorship on this one, not from that sub.
I don't know, maybe they didn't like the fact that racially charged posts bring out all the toxic racists on reddit to comment. Like seriously, these alt right guys who come out are cretins. Maybe, you know, most people who aren't totally racist don't like those people spewing their toxicity.
This is no comment on the news event or the article. I've just seen the brigading before, and nobody likes you if you do that.
If reddit has a bias problem it really really really isnt a right wing one. Yes there are toxic right wing members but on the whole this website is so left that it smells like donkey shite
**Weasel word**
A weasel word, or anonymous authority, is an informal term for words and phrases such as "researchers believe" and "most people think" which make arguments appear specific or meaningful, even though these terms are at best ambiguous and vague. Using weasel words may allow someone to later deny any specific meaning if the statement is challenged, because the statement was never specific in the first place. Weasel words can be a form of tergiversation, and may be used in advertising and political statements to mislead.
Weasel words can soften or under-state a biased or otherwise controversial statement.
***
^[ [^PM](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=kittens_from_space) ^| [^Exclude ^me](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiTextBot&message=Excludeme&subject=Excludeme) ^| [^Exclude ^from ^subreddit](https://np.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/about/banned) ^| [^FAQ ^/ ^Information](https://np.reddit.com/r/WikiTextBot/wiki/index) ^| [^Source](https://github.com/kittenswolf/WikiTextBot) ^]
^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
Thank you, Porphyrogennetos, for voting on WikiTextBot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. [You can view results here](https://botrank.pastimes.eu/).
***
^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)
>Maybe, you know, most people who aren't totally racist don't like those people spewing their toxicity.
Yeah, that's a great excuse for ignoring discussions about societal problems caused almost entirely by blacks and latinos
The only toxic racist here is the woman in the OP story,
spewing her hate speech about "white male privilege".
Typical racist shaming attempt when one of these cretins has no real argument.
You don't have to be right wing to despise such toxic racism and sexism.
19 comments
65 u/NorseGodLoki0411 [OP] 17 Jan 2019 04:07
28 u/Good-Boi 17 Jan 2019 08:37
5 u/Euphemism 17 Jan 2019 17:37
12 u/acemandoom 17 Jan 2019 12:31
12 u/undue-influence 17 Jan 2019 13:16
-4 u/Terminal-Psychosis 17 Jan 2019 13:53
14 u/NorseGodLoki0411 [OP] 17 Jan 2019 14:02
-40 u/0asq 17 Jan 2019 04:42
34 u/TheCrimsonChinchilla 17 Jan 2019 06:09
14 u/expatriate77 17 Jan 2019 09:25
18 u/DutchmanDavid 17 Jan 2019 10:23
6 u/WikiTextBot 17 Jan 2019 10:24
7 u/Porphyrogennetos 17 Jan 2019 12:56
-1 u/B0tRank 17 Jan 2019 12:57
1 u/undue-influence 17 Jan 2019 13:15
2 u/Porphyrogennetos 17 Jan 2019 12:58
-2 u/0asq 17 Jan 2019 13:45
7 u/Terminal-Psychosis 17 Jan 2019 14:01
4 u/kubrick66 17 Jan 2019 21:37