70 comments

39
Rightly so, conservatives don't care about identity politics. You're looking for the Democratic party
-7
Politics is identity poltics. Here's the recent voting demographics and stats on who produces and consumes: http://magaimg.net/img/7hpa.png http://magaimg.net/img/7hpc.png http://magaimg.net/img/7hpd.png Your idol, Ben Shapiro, always says, "Facts don't care about your feelings." Guess you had better accept those facts. *Thanks for following me over from /Conservative, too! Good puppy.
2
Hol' up! 1. It's /r/conservative 2. I'm a subscribed member of this subreddit. I've been here for months. While I do comment and am an active member in /r/conservative. I did not see your comment or, and I'm pretty sure about this, the post you commented on, or even the comment you posted on. 3. You were not censored, you violated the rules of sub and of Reddit. Which is essentially don't be a racist douche. 4. You are not a conservative you do not belong to the right. You are a racist and we, despite what the media/Dems would have you believe, don't want you in our party/political ideology. Again, you're looking for the Dems as numerous BLACK CONSERVATIVES have said are the true racist, whose policies have kept and caused the blacks to stay in poverty.
4
> You were not censored, ... don't be a racist pick 1 >racist douche. pick 1 > Again, you're looking for the Dems as numerous BLACK CONSERVATIVES have said are the true racist, "I'm totally not racist and identity politics have no place in cuckservativsm also do listen to these BASED BLACKS explaining how conservativatism helps BLACKS. Fuck Whitey"
1
[removed]
6
You cuckservatives and the shitlibs you make fun of are no different, haha! "Race and IQ differences hurt my mellow man! REEEE!"
-1
You think im a conservative? LOL
10
Cuckservatives, shitlibs, commies.. they're all the same. They both subvert the country.
0
You're next to the gulag
1
> replies to month old comments
1
Stop embracing tribalism, Ytee! Das fo us UHPRESSED! SKRT SKRT!
4
You gate keeping retard. This is why conservatives are a laughing stock.
3
Oh, here's your idol and his double standards with how he agrees with immigration to America and disagrees with it when the subject is israel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXfnAMMpW_o Enjoy! :) *[Here's demographics broken down by how X person was only allowed to vote in America.](http://magaimg.net/img/7fe5.jpg)
1
well duh i want everywhere to take the migrants i dont want here lol Same thing for Ben
5
To him: israel opening its doors to the Turd World: OY VEY! Stop being anti-sementic!?! America opening its doors to the Turd World: Bravo! Take all of them, goises!
2
You. I like you.
-1
What if we think both should be ok with diversity?
5
Hence why they never conserve anything.
13
Adopting positions liberals held 10 years ago epic style. They now have people flaired "gay conservative".
1
And soon they'll ban you for "transphobia" if they don't already.
10
I recall reading that Shrillennials are the generation [least friendly to the First Amendment](https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/20/40-of-millennials-ok-with-limiting-speech-offensive-to-minorities/) (guess WHO encroaches on those rights), coming out in favor of hate speech codes on campus by a wide margin. I also recall reading that after breaking down the survey data by race, White Millennials are very pro-1A. The real book burners are the Ochre Hordes who currently squat at about 37% of the total US population, and quickly growing in number, especially as a percentage of Millennials. These are the future Americans who will use the Constitution as toilet paper. Our vigrants don’t much care for, or about, airy-fairy notions of free speech. That’s a Heritage America thing, and Heritage Americans are so…yesterday. Here’s a stunner: 71% of Silicon Valley tech workers are [foreign-born](https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/17/h-1b-foreign-citizens-make-up-nearly-three-quarters-of-silicon-valley-tech-workforce-report-says/). Big Tech leads the charge to censor political dissidents and demonetize insufficiently submissive Whites who exercise their free speech. It’s all coming together now. We are beginning to make sense of Clown World. Free speech, like almost all idealized Western credos, is racial in provenance. Whites are slower to rouse to anger, and generally more tolerant of opposing views. Whites can handle personal insults against either themselves or their kin without resorting to violence in answer. Free speech is thus best viewed as a natural continuation of a pre-existing White psychological disposition. The Bill of Rights is White temperament codified. But Paperwork Americans are different, culturally, genetically, psychologically. In most of the world’s people, intolerance is the norm. Impulsive anger is the norm. Contempt for open debate is the norm. Thin skin is the norm. To them, free speech is a casus belli for violent redress. They can see it no other way. The only way they can live with each other is through a byzantine array of tacit and de jure social taboos governing interpersonal communication. Speech restriction is how they keep a lid on their tempers. This is why legal enshrinement of abstract principles such as free speech never materialized in the Ochrelands. This is why the Ochre-hai laugh at our quaint ideas of free speech, and why they will tear up, first, the spirit of 1A and, second, the letter of 1A, once they have achieved demographic critical mass. Which they are already doing. The Ochrefication of America is underway. Our cherished Anglo-Germanic rights won’t survive the onslaught. You can’t expect alien peoples to honor and respect the same principles that Heritage Americans honor and respect. The principles must be felt in the bones to be obeyed and sustained, and despite universalist agitprop to the contrary, the vast majority of the world feels nothing in their bones for creedal America. When they rule, the rules will change. You will see.
5
Das rayciss identity politics tho
8
When races compete for representation and power under a shared political system, politics becomes a referendum on race. White men with impeccable socialist credentials will lose to bartender browns. It’s already happening. The Cortezization of the Democrat Party will accelerate the transformation of the Republican Party into the Trump Party. More and more White men of a Dem disposition will quickly grasp that they have no future with the Dems, and they will be encouraged by Trump’s appropriation of populist ideas traditionally espoused by Dems to switch parties and join the Trumpening. Or: what I and others have been predicting all along will materialize. The pressures of increasing racial diversity will sever historical ideological ties to the two main political parties and replace them with tawdry racial ties as the binding ingredient, de facto morphing the Democrats into the party of nonWhites and the Republicans into the party of Whites. This is already happening as a majority of Whites vote Republican and a majority of minorities vote Dem, and will continue to do so. If Trump plays his cards right and doesn’t cave to cuckservative policy boilerplate about free markets and colorblindness, he can lock up the Rust Belt and Upper Midwest for generations to come. But he has to be willing to accept, internally if not explicitly, that he is the head of a political movement that will restore America for the benefit of her native Whites. Once he accepts that, and what it means, his policy prescriptions will follow suit.
2
Well, they're going to lose then
23
Open borders for Israel:)
8
atleast that is better than opening borders for maxican cartels 😊
10
/r/Conservative has been /r/cuckservative for a long time.
7
I found that out pretty fast.
9
Go shill somewhere else.
4
Get back to your vidya.
9
I was shadowbanned from r/Conservative for suggesting that the Ted Cruz supporters start attacking Hillary Clinton instead of Donald Trump. It was late in the primary race, so Donald was the nominee in all but name. I just pointed out that we shouldn't attack the Republican nominee right before the election. Nope! That's WRONGTHINK. Shadowban for me.
0
[deleted]
4
You actually can shadowban someone from a subreddit in a way, by configuring automoderator to remove their posts or comments. It's not a "shadowban", but it has the same effect.
6
r/Conservative has been cucksville for a long time. I recall they were frantically NeverTrump to the very end. And the same people who are "against identity politics" would sell girl scout cookies to buy bullets to put "border-crossing invaders" into the ground, so long as that border was Israel's.
3
This is a shiv of mass proportions. Succinct and concise.
6
/r/conservative is a lite version of /r/socialism. /r/socialism is ban happy. /r/conservative will only tolerate you to an extent for disagreeing views, but will eventually ban you if you're making arguments they don't like (they banned me despite how courteous I was being, just for my arguments).
3
They banned me for making a “no fun allowed” joke
2
What's Ben's views on the islamisation of Israel? Or should I say reislamisation as Palestine is rightful Arab territory.
1
6 more years of this lol
1
This thread is a dumpster fire of constant reports on posts. OP has their side of the story and people responding have their side with claims to back up. **Discuss the situation like adults and show your side of the argument, but NO ONE IS TO PERSONALLY ATTACK OTHER USERS** understood? Play nice kiddos.
1
Good mod.
1
Got banned for saying that scandinavia is actually a pretty good place to live in, when everyone was trying to make it seem like all welfare is socialism. Asked why and they replied "You didnt meet our low standards".
-2
Why wouldn't they ban you lmao
0
Because free speech doesn't exist under leftist comment sections.
-1
Lol nobody likes you
7
I think he made some good points I remember his name from some other decent posts in other subs. A+ guy in my book
-19
Somebody said, "Shapiro is a national treasure" and I responded with "The same Ben **"I don't give a good damn about the browning of America"** Shapiro? Yeah, sounds like a real "conservative"." More here: http://magaimg.net/img/7lpd.jpg
38
Very convenient that you didn't include the slur you used in your original comment. https://gyazo.com/745281ef1559d5c8353424161533a547
-13
That's after I was banned. Thanks for following me like a fart, "goldbach".
26
So you get banned and use a slur to retaliate? Nice, just an all around A+ user.
-9
> A+ user I know
9
If you were banned, how could you leave a comment? Not how bans work
1
Retard, I edited my comment.
10
You can't edit after a ban Are you unable to have a conversation without using slurs? It completely discredits anything you say.
6
> You can't edit after a ban I already did. Go look for one of my comments over there and I'll edit it. > discredits Sure, bud.
7
I've no interest in searching for your comments. If you don't understand why name calling and rude language discredit your points you are in the wrong place
6
That's what I thought. Next time, man up and know when you're wrong. Still edited my comment and I tagged you. OOOPSIEE
4
I just tried editing my comment from a ban last week, nope As to following your tag, uninterested Have a nice day
4
> uninterested HAHA! Thanks for proving me right.
1
No matter what in your mind you are right Interestingly enough I've received no notice of being tagged in a comment - possibly because you were banned and cannot comment
2
Whether you received it or not is irrelevant, I was still able to edit my comment despite me being banned.
1
If i wasn't notified it never happened
2
Prove it.
0
http://imgur.com/gallery/BfmFzBL Don't get many as you can see
1
Yea, you post this AFTER my comment was removed, but look, I'll still edit my comment. See here: http://magaimg.net/img/7m1a.png http://magaimg.net/img/7m1b.png OOOPSIEEEEEEE
-1
Likely because your comment was removed.
4
Nope, still in thread
1
On reddit I can confirm that you can edit and delete posts after a ban, just not make new posts. edit: [Proof](https://i.imgur.com/dILF9my.png)
11
I share your concerns about shifting demographics. I think your message would be much more effective if you avoided curses / slurs. Know your audience - this is Reddit, not 4 Chan.
3
I said nothing about demographics. The quote is directly talking about Ben and his tweet and how he's a "conservative". I'm pointing out that Ben is nowhere near being a conservative, but a typical neocon.