93 comments

59
looks like by 2020 there will be only /r/politics and /r/aww/ left.
33
/r/pics will officially have merged into /r/politics so that statement holds up
31
And /r/worldnews is basically "how can I post some Trump shit with a vague reference to another country to dodge the non-US only news requirement". How the fuck is it okay for that subreddits entire frontpage to be Trump/Mueller or whatever the fuck they cook up next. For other news topic, you can't have more than one post per topic, even if a ton of new information has come out and the original thread was locked, but 50 posts about the same Trump thing is okay.
7
Don’t forget r/MurderedByWords basically just posts krassenstein (or however you spell MLM scumbag) low effort, automated retorts to trump tweets.
20
The Donald stands proud against the evil admins.... This is Sparta mother fuckers!
12
I assume this is _only_ because he’s the sitting president. If he had lost, I guarantee it would have been banned, but banning TD now would cause an onslaught of media attention.
-18
Wtf is wrong with you people.
9
Nothing. You on the other hand, lost and can't get over it.
3
You couldn't have a better username, mixing social justice and being a white knight in shining armor but secretly a pussy pig but lonely and doesn't actually get laid LMAO You poor thing...
1
R.E.K.T.
27
Not banned. Their modlist now has subversion SJW mods now. Probably will be banned in the future.
5
Gotta love that transmod grooming children eh?
4
Kind of hard to be subverted when everyone is aware they are there. Just check out all the u/drewiepoodle posts.
24
Haven't really been there, but had no idea they were right-leaning? Also I find it counter-productive to just censor the opposition. It just makes their supporters more loyal. I don't know if Trump will win 2020, but his opposition is just too weak atm. The Dems need to just get better candidates if they want to win. All of this pussy-footing around will get them nowhere.
10
Honestly, to say CA is "right leaning" is a bit disingenuous. They're alt-right by the actual definition of the term (as opposed to the /r/politics definition of "anyone I disagree with"). Lots of white nationalists, antisemitism, and anti-Islam. Granted, they're mostly shitposting and being edge lords, but its still there. Got some Q-Anon types and other conspiracy nutters too. Having said that, I absolutely detest reddit's plan to ban them. Quarantine was enough (and imo, still kinda shitty but I get it).
4
I’m surprised Q anons are still around
0
Was there ever anything that definitively invalidated the “movement”? I don’t know the whole context, but I assume with Assange in custody they’d be more riled up than ever.
4
Their predictions never came true
5
It was satire...
-5
Sure, there's tons of satire and jokes on CA. There's also quite a bit of legitimate bigotry.
17
Reddit is full of bigotry. Just go to r/politics for some leftist bigotry. It's not against any rules.
3
Of course, I never said bigotry is against the rules (nor am I supporting a ban/quarantine of CA)
3
Sorry, I just keep hearing how it's because of all the rules they broke. It's all just stupid, really.
1
I mean, reddit admins can arbitrarily create and impose whatever rules they want. Hell they could just say "Hate speech is against the rules" and ban anyone and everyone since "hate speech" is a bullshit, made up term with no real definition.
7
Being anti-Islam makes one “alt-right”? TIL I’m alt-right lol.
3
Which is ironic because they also say conservatism and radical Islam shared the same beliefs... which just sounds absurd.
2
Radical Islam is the extreme right by practically every definition. They are hyper-conservative religious fundamentalists. The ironic thing is how the far left types defend their practices and ideology... really it just betrays a sort of soft racism that prevails on the left, i.e. "those poor poor helpless minorities need me, a guilty white person living in the West, to lift them out of their cycle of poverty and violence"
1
That comparison is so wild wtf. That's like saying child trafficking and Disney World are basically the same thing because their goal is to make money off of children. It's a poor argument. Also I don't think fundamentalist is the right word to use here for conservatives lol... there are tons of things in the bible that even super-conservative christians don't take literally.
1
I don't think you understand the definition of conservatism. Kinda seems like you are only considering the word in the context of contemporary American politics, which is folly.
1
\> context of contemporary American politics Isn't that *exactly* what we're talking about here.....?
1
Again, I really think you need to re-read the definition of conservatism. I am NOT comparing American conservatives (i.e. Republicans) to Islamists. But both groups *are* conservative. Your post that I replied to: > ironic because they also say conservatism and radical Islam shared the same beliefs I'm using the context you started with. That's not irony, that's just them being wrong. What they're trying, but failing to say is that both are conservative ideologies, which is correct... that doesn't make them similar in any way other than being conservative ideologies though!
1
I know what you're saying, and you're not wrong. But man what a dumb comparison that isn't relevant at all in the context it's used lol
1
Well, I was just exposing how hypocritical the left actually is... They defend Islamists and Muslims in general while acting like American conservatives (Republicans, Trump supporters, etc.) are literally Nazis... When in reality Islam is MUCH more conservative, and MUCH closer to Nazism than Republicans. Its hilarious.
1
Yea you're right. We shouldn't try to comprehend the reasoning. It's kind of a pointless endeavor lol
2
No, being anti-Islam is not what makes someone alt-right. Alt-right is defined as white nationalism and right-wing populism. And I'm not saying that everyone in CA is alt-right ('cause that'd make me alt-right too). But it's wrong to say those types and their rhetoric aren't there too.
21
The Democrats need to stop hoisting up people who want to take away your constitutional rights, take away your money, stand in the way of protecting our border and putting foreign criminals above our own citizens, allow the Boston bomber to vote, using identity politics, and then I might consider voting for one.
19
Historical elections tell you Trump will win by a large margin but he isn't taking it lightly, it most likely will be some poor DNC stooge going into a slaughter house... Sitting presidents are most likely elected again than not. Sitting presidents never get voted out with a strong economy and low unemployment. Parties often win in twos and if they do really well 3s and that is the few times a sitting president gets voted out ( see Bush Sr. After two Regan terms as an example) Then two bill Clinton's, then two bushes, then two Obama, you will now get two Trump's. His approval rating is decent, economy is strong, lots of people working, gas prices mild at least and could dip back down again, no major wars, NK is at least calmed down a lot. The average person is sitting pretty content and happy....
-27
You're a fucking idiot, literally nobody I know has a good view on Trump. No normal sane person supports him. Unemployment has been reduced in the middle and upper classes, but the lower class has literally never been worse off. Issues with North Korea, Russia and the Arab world are at an all time high and Trump in many situations has literally been a trigger away from war. There is not a chance in hell that Trump is getting re-elected.
16
Want to put your money where your mouth is?
16
You need to get out more then. It's not healthy to avoid opposing viewpoints.
8
>You're a fucking idiot why swear for? can we not have a civil discussion? also [Almost 7 in 10 voters nationwide say they think Hillary Clinton will win the presidency next month](https://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/25/politics/hillary-clinton-2016-election-poll/index.html)
3
No true scotsman. And i'll be screenshotting that post for later just in case
6
Thats probably because you try to silence anyone that has a different view then you.
3
> but the lower class has literally never been worse off. Mcdonalds is hiring for 12 an hour when 3 years ago it was 8. Fuck off
1
You know, if it was just a bunch of leftie moralizers it'd still be fucked but whatever. But fucking SRD mods? seriously? and a child groomer?
10
CA exists because they (Admins) kept culling off subs, so the users migrated. By culling CA, they'll all just move to another Sub.
6
I gotta say, the place went full retard once it was quarantined.
5
As if the dems can do anything about 2020, lol. The Trump Train has no brakes, MAGA! Any farting cows on the tracks are gonna get mowed down \^_^
-8
I love the ZOG too fellow (((MAGAPEDE)))
-7
You're a fucking idiot
6
Look I know that's a top-tier insult when you use it on your classmates, but you need to understand that some people on reddit are older than 12. Insults like yours are old and used up. Like your mom.
3
[You are a straight up nutter, you fucking loon. 🤣](http://i.imgur.com/WPk2yjB.jpg) I mean it tho. You have actual mental issues.
4
They’re doing it pretty lamely, either ban them or don’t, why play with your food? They wanna watch CA squirm? Silliness.
7
Because /u/spez is a sneaky, underhanded kike that wants to ban anyone that might offend his corporate masters, but he also wants to avoid the fallout of banning these people. He wants to have his cake and eat it too. Why do you think they've been after the piracy subs so hard lately?
1
SHUT IT DOWN
1
That's weird. Usually, subs just get banned, without several days of warning.
1
When it happens, I can’t wait until everyone spills over into other subreddits. They will regret banning it.
1
[https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/495045090029338643/569981666924429312/unknown.png](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/495045090029338643/569981666924429312/unknown.png)
-2
All these comments talking about this being the dems fault for them needing to be better for election are fucking hilarious. Reddit admins said it was because of rule breaking and/or violent behaviour not being shut down frequently enough. Can always trust this sub to give me some grouse spin
-2
No, cringe anarchy is being banned because they have broken the rules multiple times and have been sending death threats to reddit admits. Their users are being very violent, saying racist and anti-semitic shit. The mods are doing nothing at all, in fact they are encouraging this kind of behavior, which is disgusting. [Here is a pastebin](https://pastebin.com/uh6qY5UH?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app) detailing all of the violence that the sub has done, the radio silence the mods have, and the unwillingness to actually freaking moderate. Please stop telling lies about this story, and tell the truth.
2
That's a person's opinion that they were spreading violence, not proof.
-18
Mayocide now
9
Obvious racist, is racist.
-2
[removed]
6
Obvious racist, is even more obvious. Very sad. Must be hard with a low IQ.
3
This comment was removed. It read: >You'll be first in the race war. Reddit's rules clearly state: >Content is prohibited if it: >Threatens, harasses, or bullies or encourages others to do so
-7
Thank you I wasn't sure if it was inappropriate.
3
What a low IQ, loser faggot. Go suck off some better genetics, moron
-1
I'm searching grindr but all I see is ur dad and we both know I won't find good genetics there.
2
>"implying you could reproduce anyway" Be honest. Your genetics are dead AF How are you gonna reproduce while searching for degeneracy on a gay hookup app? You just proved, and demonstrated your retardation
0
My genetics are alive and well in ur dad's butt. He likes me because I am black.
1
Goddamn, what a comeback! I see that high IQ that "POC" are known for! What a baste black faggot! I bow to you in submission. Please, come fuck me in the ass, inferior, retarded black man! Im not worthy!
0
No I will not fuck you. Man's gotta have standards
1
Your mom did, faggot
1
Huh that explains why she was using her vibrator
1
Why didn't you remove the comment saying "mayocide now"? Do you condone the genocide of one race, based on the low IQ, and inferior impulse control and culture of another?! What a cuck.
-1
Mayocide now is too fucking ridiculous to be serious. The next comment the user made was obviously directly threatening. It's ok to be ridiculous, it's not ok to be seriously wanting someone to die.
8
Bullshit, faggot. That user was serious, otherwise they wouldn't have made a subsequent threatening message, retard. By not removing it, you're showing your bias. Im gonna do a BIG THINK, and guess that you're not white. Fucking retard
-1
Hi, hungryhobo2! I wish you nothing but the best! Have a wonderful day! -HappyFriendlyBot
1
ily2 bby
1
You're on a sub that is made entirely to fight censorship. As a moderator I am constantly trying to ensure I do as little removing of comments as possible. Imagine the irony if we just removed everything. Look at my post history. I'm the whitest guy you'll meet. I'm sorry you feel that I was being biased. I really wasn't. I'm just trying to be as lenient as possible when it comes to comment removal. That's all it is. I genuinely feel like you're mistaking me for one of the shitty mods we post in this sub about all the time. I assure you I'm not. If I were, would I show this kind of concern about your feelings? No, I'd tell you to fuck off, remove your comment, and ban your ass. I'm not that kind of mod. This isn't that kind of sub. Sorry you feel the way you do though. I do hope I can change your mind.
3
I believe a comment calling for a genocide of an entire group of people based on their skin color alone, is grounds for a removal of that specific comment. If you can't see THAT, then maybe you're not fit to be moderating a goddamn thing. Much less, having children. FUCK all of these people advocating for exterminating the race of people that brought about, and created the 21st century. Yet, you're willing to give them all a pass! Even as a self professed "white person"! (Which I highly doubt, at this point) How would you feel if I said "hang all n1ggers now! (Which I would never do)... Would THAT be grounds for removal?! Why is it so different when it comes to "white" people?! Because we're not "oppressed"?! Because we have culture? Because we're civil?! Because we have intelligence? This is all very confusing
-1
Whelp. I tried. Have a good night friend.
1
Mayocide today. Mayocide tomorrow. This is the first step my friend. First they come for the redditors
1
Poe's Law. There is no indication that it is sarcastic.
-30
Nice try. The admins of CA admitted they fucked up thinking that automod could take care of everything.
-35
There are right leaning communities that follow the rules and aren't being punished, you just want a way to frame this as a persecution of poor poor conservatives. CringeAnarchy's ban was long over due, the shit they let slide was insane and broke a ton of rules.
24
No mods or admins ever explained which rules were violated. And you know exactly why.
-4
the rule against advocating violence was broken multiple times.
5
Nah
-5
Ye
8
But in reality, that's not true. There would be, as the person I responded to put it, "a ton" of evidence.
-4
Because it's so obvious that questioning whether any specific rule was broken is disingenuous and goofy, that's exactly why.