15 comments

37
Here's the comment they censored: >Answer: people think a video that shows all her mess ups edited together is now “fake” , after they posted the original video, it pretty much shows it’s the same thing just cut for time and impact. Dems can’t handle this then sit back and spin out of context videos themselves for the right freely without any calls for deleting Facebook prior. As per usual real news is now fake because it’s shining a negative light, and fake news is real because calling it fake is a “threat to democracy”. Reminds me of the disabled reporter fake story, but now it’s on the left so DeleteFacebook because we can’t control them on this one and it’s spreading too quickly and embarrassingly. Here's the one that somehow wasn't against the rules: >Answer: A fake/doctored video attempting to discredit Nancy Pelosi (US politician, Democrat, Speaker of the House) was hosted on Facebook and viewed millions of times. >It’s pretty obviously fake and people want Facebook to either delete the video or at the very least label the video as fake. >They said they won’t do either. >As a response people are deleting their Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp (Facebook owns all 3) accounts and encouraging others to do the same.
13
Its very strange. They deleted a comment that linked a video ["Can You Trust Apple? Facebook? Google?"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjLHuhOTnaI) Is the theory that reddit is in collusion with these central companies and doesn't want any of them to lose their current power? I guess I say strange is that the prevailing attitude is that reddit has a left political leaning, but perhaps its simply more about control and less about left right dichotomies. I dunno, its strange.
-4
The deleted answer is objectively wrong though. The video in question is one where a speech she’s given had the audio shifted to make her sound drunk, it’s not a compilation at all. I don’t really mind the mods removing outright misinformation.
13
> The video in question is one where a speech she’s given had the audio shifted to make her sound drunk, it’s not a compilation at all. Incorrect. The original hoopla was centered around the video that was slowed down. Now the media is conflating that obviously doctored video with another one that is simply cut up to show how Pelosi slurs and stammers like a drunk, pill popping 80 year old. The latter video is not slowed down or modified other than editing it down for time / impact like NorseGodLoi0411's quoted comment said.
-4
What’s biased about the second answer?
7
>it's pretty obviously fake Obvious - easily perceived or understood; clear, self-evident, or apparent. There's a massive rift where one side believes this is fake and the other definitely disagrees. If this were truly "easily perceived or understood" then there wouldn't be another side big enough to cause the controversy that we're currently seeing. How is it biased? Fuck outta here with that shit.
4
Because the video is not fake at all, it is edited yes - but its simple cuts that show each time she did or said something in an odd way. That is totally harmless and is not fake at ALL. it is biased because they are trying to instantly say Donald Trump is bad and deflect away from Nancy pelosi's strange behavior
16
I have been following that sub for a while now, and it comes across like that sub is used and astroturfed to amplify the political narratives of those who control the sub , have about current topics.
9
Yeah. It's pretty upsetting to see it fall in to the liberal shit hole that everything that was once good seems to be falling in to.
8
That sub has turned into just as much a rabid leftist Shareblue propaganda outlet as /politics & Co. These yahoos have ruined many more formerly worthy non political subs. /adviceanimals is full of it, /bestof completely lost. Very sad to see, and all with blatant admin approval. :(
2
How could this happen? How dare someone make fun of skeletor
0
Censoring that comment is definitely a shitty thing to do, but the video is pretty obviously distorted/edited. The order of the words isn’t even right between the real/fake video Edit: order of the words isn’t changed. Audio is slowed down/certain portions cut to make Pelosi seem incoherent
-2
It’s actually fake according to the New York Times though
6
😂
6
Wasen't the NYT among those attacking the covington high students even though that narrative was false?