The majority of the stuff I’ve seen supports my position, but “the jury is still out” is an alternative way of saying that yes there is some literature out there that runs contrary to my position. It’s pragmatic to align your views with the weight of the evidence unless or until that evidence changes. That’s how science works. We’re constantly revising our hypotheses as new data comes in. It’s not doublespeak at all to acknowledge that. I don’t even understand *why* people would be so interested in studying racial differences in GI if not to validate preexisting racism. But this is all beside the point, which is that in-group variation is so much larger than inter-group variation that it doesn’t even make sense to plant your flag on that factor when there is so much more going on. It’s practically analagous to pointing to a light rain as the reason your ship is sinking after having hit an iceberg. Part of the story? Maybe, but not worth focusing on. Like I said above, *even if* genetic differences accounted for the overwhelming majority of behavior traits and outcomes, it doesn’t justify racism. How would you feel if you were on the other side of this and were the one being judged over preconceived notions and treated as subhuman simply bc of the color of your skin?