*law enforcement noises*

Yeah, and it became a meme, such as an image of the Joker with a question including these statistics. Dunno why the post got locked, since I've seen other posts with this statistic in it on that subreddit.

It's misleading tho because not only do poor people commit more crime but prosecutors are more likely to pursue black offenders. It should be noted that black people make up 52% of **convicted** offenders.

Ohh yeah, i almost forgot about that. Lol Thanks man

Yeah thats just an isolated incident, but the jews are behind everything lol. Anyways, the ol' IQ argument. In regards to, Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study, the ONLY study with a longitudinal follow up: "In both waves the wholly White adoptees had a higher mean IQ than the Black–White adoptees, and the Black–White adoptees had a higher mean IQ than the Black–Black adoptees, in line with the hereditarian model. Moreover, those IQ gaps widened between the study’s two waves, consistent with genes exerting greater power as the adoptees aged." However... "A total of 25 White adoptees were in the study when it began, nine of whom were lost at follow-up. The lost adoptees had relatively low IQs, so the remaining White adoptees were unrepresentatively high in IQ, as Mackintosh observed [25]. One can prove this by comparing the original IQs of the full sample and the subgroup who were measured at both ages 7 and 17; the latter subgroup had an initial mean IQ of 117.6 (with a minimum IQ of 92) but the full sample had an initial mean of 111.5 (minimum 62). Because initial and final IQs had a correlation of 0.63 among the White group, the elite subgroup would likely have had their final mean IQ inflated by about 0.63 × (117.6 − 111.5) = 3.8 points. Meanwhile, the BW and Black–Black adoptees lost to follow-up hardly differed in IQ from the remaining adoptees, so attrition inflated those groups’ mean IQs by about only 0.2 and −0.7 points respectively. Adjusting the final mean IQs accordingly (Table 2) implies smaller racial differences of 3.5 points (White vs. BW adoptees) and 11.7 points (White vs. Black–Black adoptees) in the study’s final wave. The former is only 1 point wider than the corresponding initial difference, and the latter is 3 points narrower. Hence, allowing for attrition, the IQ differences between the White and the Black adoptees were no larger at age 17 than at age 7, a sign that the apparent enlarging was an artifact and not a genetic effect." Whites were also adopted almost year earlier than the blacks or asians in this study which has been documented to negatively effect IQ. Furthermore, "The other studies of Black adoptees [15,16] do not fit the hereditarian model nearly as well, as the race-IQ correlations they found were all either small or associated higher IQ with greater Black ancestry." "there are two more oft-cited Black adoptee studies. One is Tizard [15], a one-page report spun off from a language-acquisition study. In that study 64 4½-year-olds took the Wechsler Pre-school and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) IQ test, of whom 24 “had been adopted into white families at a mean age of 3.1 yr” (p. 316). A total of 17 adoptees were White and had a mean IQ of 113.0, and seven were BW and had a mean IQ of 119.9. The superior IQ of the adoptees with more Black ancestry reverses the main result of Scarr and Weinberg. In Scarr and Weinberg [13], the BW adoptees lagged the White adoptees by 2.5 ± 3.5 points, while in Tizard [15], the BW adoptees outscored the White adoptees by 6.9 ± 6.6 points. The other study is Moore’s [16], which assessed 23 Black–Black and BW adoptees, raised in White families, on the WISC. Like Tizard [15] and unlike Scarr and Weinberg [13], the adoptees with more Black ancestry had higher IQs: nine fully Black adoptees had a mean IQ of 118.0 and 14 BW adoptees had a mean IQ of 116.5. The resulting IQ difference is 1.5 ± 4.1 points, where the standard error is approximate because the standard deviations involved are pooled estimates." Although I'm pretty sure you guys don't read studies and just get your info baby bird fed to you by stefan molyneux, here's the source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526420

This might fun for you to look up, but 90% of people who possess child porn in the U.S. and U.K. are non Hispanic whites. And whites only make up 60% of the U.S.,please stay away from children. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/21349830/ I have the full pdf somewhere if you want to check it out.