Oh, you’re completely out of the loop and just putting words in my mouth. > Blacks are not a race because There was no because in what I've said. Black is a race. Genocides on the other hand are almost never race related. They happen between the nations who are related or even within one nation – like cultural revolution genocide. Rwanda genocide wasn't racist as "people behind" it were... Tutsi and Hutu who killed each other. You can hate Tutsi and be okay with blacks in general. This doesn't make you a racist. It makes you a nationalist or maybe a bigot. So calling Rwanda genocide racist is like calling Tiananmen, Yunnan or Daoxian massacres were racist. Chinese has tons of prejudices toward Japanese but this doesn't make them racist just nationalist – you know the one that CCP is so eager to raise. There is a word for this – Nipponophobia. > Jews are not a singular race Jew is not a race at all. It's a nation just like Arab and Chinese. National socialist persecuted Jews – maybe that will give you a clue on distinction between nationalism and racism. As a matter of fact Jews invented a special term for their persecution – anti-semitism. Despite the fact that semite isn't a synonym for a Jew and include arabs and some extinct nations somehow it sticked. > Calling all white people warmongering sister-fuckers or all Indians dirty rapists The former is racist because white is a race just like black. The latter maybe nationalistic, chauvinistic or xenophobic depending on the context because Indian is a nation. Because you know... word has meaning and their main purpose is to convey that meaning. I guess you are too lazy and/or stupid (I'll give you benefit of a doubt) to look up a definition of a racist so here you go: > racist /ˈreɪsɪst/ noun a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another. Racism is just like communism it oversimplifies your world view and lead to false conclusions. To be racist you have to simultaneous meet two criteria: show prejudice and base it exclusively on one's race (not nation). Notice you don't have to be an outsider to be racist. White socialist are predominantly racist because they show prejudice toward white solely on the basis of race. But you can't be racist to Chinese if you target them exclusively as Chinese and not as Asian. It doesn't makes it okay nor it makes it racist. On the other hand following your logic you should see [this] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Harry_R._Hopps,_Destroy_this_mad_brute_Enlist_-_U.S._Army,_03216u_edit.jpg) or [this] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lindsay_German_monster.jpg) as racist towards white people which makes no sense. It was made by white people and was targeted exclusively toward Germans. As a matter of fact there is a special word for this too – germanophobia. What is obvious to me is that many nations China have walked all over (like Taiwan, HK, Tibet, etc.) hate China just like Chinese hate Japan. What is also obvious is that this hate doesn't make all them racist. Guess it's all have more to do with historical context rather than bigotry. By the way you didn't answer why you dig through tons comments in order to target specific type of people. As it seems like you've spend a lot of time on this hunt for the past 7 years as if it was your day job.