22 comments

11
https://i.imgur.com/CTaRErk.jpg Never got an answer as to why
40
Never beg and grovel to mods.. Especially not mainstream subs like that one. We ain't nothing but janitors, it's just that some have a chip on their shoulder
19
https://i.imgur.com/xzULSaX.jpg Oops
22
[deleted]
12
Lmao right. Takes like 30 seconds.
10
whaddya mean you never got an answer? They clearly stated the reason: Editorialized Title They probably think it's racist against China too, but they weren't going to tell you that.
6
It’s not an editorialized title imo
10
It's not my rules, and your opinion doesn't matter. Read that sub's sidebar. If you look in the article the phrase 10% does not appear anywhere. Yeah it's really stupid that they banned you. The post is still up so obviously it wasn't a problem. With all the awards you got it makes no sense. I think some mod just got a stick up their butt.
1
Keep in mind, the communist Chinese government is reddit's 2nd largest investor. VERY obvious, all over reddit, especially the cesspool of censorship and CCP propaganda that is /coronavirus. All the major subs are totally trying to crack down on real numbers, even going so far as calling criticism of the CCP "racist". They're pretty desperate, and not hard to see why. The commie Chinese government may as well have launched a nuke. They should close down all high lvl bio labs, especially the biggest, worst highest lvl (4) in Wuhan, that this Frankenstein's monster escaped from.
3
damn u beggin like a bitch lol
2
They muted me for it
1
> Never got an answer as to why Yes you did. I clicked your article. Is this the title, yes or no? >To Tame Coronavirus, Mao-Style Social Control Blankets China What does YOUR submission title say? What is the rule in /r/worldnews about editorialising titles? You deserved the ban and you are being really shady by framing it about them not liking statistics. You broke the most cardinal rule of the subreddit. Read the rules. Right there: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/submit The only way you can technically change a title is if the title makes no sense. For an example: let's say NYT ran the article with "Coronavirus, oops!" Well that would make no sense. So it would be up to you to take that and go "Coronavirus, oops! China implements social controls after the fact" Your reply to the mods was pathetic. Mine would have been: "You are right. When I saw the red part about the title, I tried too hard to clean it up and lost the intent. If you unbanned me, I would never submit a title like that again." If were the mod, I would have unbanned you for that. Instead, you're here, complaining to us and demonstrating zero awareness or culpability for something you clearly did. You are the stereotypical person who just shoplifted going "I didn't do it" when you're holding the stolen goods. We got no time for this. No idea why you got a 97% upvote. This submission should be removed by the mods here as well.
0
Lmao what a range I have from a supposed editorialized title to a shop lifter.
10
This is a propaganda site now. It has been for a while. No reason to even get upset anymore.
-2
Did you realize that OP actually broke the subs rules and was fairly banned before you spewed out the no1 circle jerked BS ? Never mind, you are an avid r/politics poster
1
Lol
1
What rule did OP break?
0
He posted an editorialized title which is against the rules
1
[deleted]
2
Like Digg
4
Another option for reviewing removed content is your re**ve**ddit [user page](https://www.reveddit.com/user/ml5c0u5lu?all=true). Get notified of content removals with the [real-time extension](https://www.reveddit.com/add-ons/). The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to remove this comment. This bot only operates in authorized subreddits.
1
[deleted]