150 comments

109
Ridiculous. There was no "hate" whatsoever. This is extremely superphobic.
15
Reddit is a circle jerking echo chamber of self-hating whites who live only to signal virtue more vigorously than their fellow soy-drunk softbody cuckold gamers. It was only a matter of time.
5
Well said.
13
being stright is hate speech to them, they are insane.
0
Being transphobic isn't a sexuality
6
Being straight is not transphobic
0
Correct, but "superstraight" is just Transphobia
0
No, it's not. Even if it were, you can't just make up new categories of human delusions and then declare everyone who doesn't feel like immediately realigning their entire worldview based on your fad to be phobic of it.
0
Except even the fucking person who started it is a transphobe spreading the "movement" because of transphobia. Which one turned out to be a fad? Not a fuckin soul talks about superstraight a month later. You're a moron full of hate on the wrong side of history that no one will want to remember. [Source](https://youtu.be/z8vQhkPnEE4)
0
There’s no such thing as wrong side of history. There’s the history written by the victors, etc. There’s no hate, just rational skepticism against a mass delusion that’s quite openly based not in any kind of science or reality, but subjective claims. It’s like being a pagan during the rise of Christianity. Yeah, you’d be on the wrong side of history for the next 2000 years for not adopting the new cult that makes openly absurd claims, but it doesn’t mean you’re wrong, just that the mass delusion has fans in positions of power where they can further spread their delusion (media, universities, etc.). A rational human being is strong enough to resist that kind of peer pressure and bandwagoning in favor of skepticism though.
0
>There’s no such thing as wrong side of history. Objectively false >There’s no hate, just rational skepticism against a mass delusion that’s quite openly based not in any kind of science or reality, but subjective claims. Thats quite the mental gymnastics jeeesus. This'll be my last comment as you're obviously not a rational actor arguing in good faith. Youre ignorant to actuall hate being spread agaisnt a minority group thats finally being accepted by the majority of our culture because scientists have come to understand how real it is. >It’s like being a pagan during the rise of Christianity. Youre actually so close to self aware its not even fit. Because thats exactly what it is like, Christian practice crushed all who didnt want to leave their religion by being crushed underfoot; assimilating those who werent strong enough to push back because they feared that their followers would see how full of shot they were when theres other worldviews so close to them. You are not the pagans in this analogy. Objectively, if you really are being scientific, you're not only wrong but a spreader of stoopid shit you maroon.
1
Go play on Voat.
105
Interesting i suppose you aren't allowed to self identify anymore.
18
So reddit is gonna go after other identity groups as well? /s
41
[deleted]
3
/r/SelfAwareWolves
94
Literally every single thing in that ban message is a lie
25
As were so many before it
58
AHS went after that one HARD
17
They were all hard.
26
Especially the *female penises*
17
Wonder why they'd take it so personally....
29
AHS users are the lowest form of troon on earth.
33
[deleted]
5
Usually only of men and lesbians. Not straight women.
4
unless famous liberal celebrity or politician is the accused. Then they ignore that.
-11
....who said anything about rape?
30
[deleted]
-14
Are there sources on people being shamed into having sex with trans people? I know several trans people and never once heard this happen. I don't recall ever seeing it happen online either
16
One of my best friends is a lesbian woman who finds it almost impossible to date. She says that 9 out of 10 lesbian women on dating sites/apps are biologically men. She's got no interest in biological men. Yet if she puts "cis women only please" she gets death threats and has been banned from the app. That's rape by coercion. She should be allowed to choose who she wishes to date - not have it forced upon her.
-18
Oh I thought you had something tangible to show me considering it's apparently such a huge issue. But sure. one single anecdotal story. Gotcha. Hopefully your "friend" is never actually raped because it's far worse than what you described. Have a good one. 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
11
That's some grade A empathy there. Is this the sort of person you really want to be - someone who laughs at the suffering of others? I hope you get more kindness than you give out, and that may some day soften your heart.
-15
🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
19
well thought out and empathetic response.
10
Would you expect otherwise from a poster on /r/superstraightphobic/? Since several super subreddits have been banned, we can no longer compare the amounts of bigotry between the two groups. Unless you consider acceptance of filtering potential sex partners based on biologcal sex or statements like "you are heckin cute and valid" hate speech, it would be pretty clear ...
-2
I was talking to an S.S. on there but sure go off
16
Man, I initially downvoted your comment, because it felt like it came out of left field. Thanks for clearing it up. The explanation was sound.
17
The shortlived movement started because people were sick of news articles, medical advice, and social media attempts to coerce them into having sex with trans people simply because they are real men/women. The point was they can be real men/women deserving of general respect while still being rejected as sex partners because of their genitals. You don't owe anyone sex. If genitals are a dealbreaker, they are a dealbreaker. Superphobes shame super straights/gays/lesbians/bis for wanting biological sex in their sex partners, call them transphobic, and sometimes try to cancel them.
-4
Can you show me some sources of people being shamed into having sex with trans people?
14
How about attempts to cancel someone for refusing to kiss a transgender woman he had shown interest in when he didn't know she was trans... https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-ginuwine-accused-transphobia-refusing-kiss-amanda-prestigiacomo How about tweets than some lesbians are men? https://i.redd.it/avekno29xlk61.jpg How about mainstream health articles redefining lesbian sex? https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/how-do-lesbians-have-sex#sex-varies Lesbian sex myth : > You don’t need to worry about STIs or pregnancy. It’s possible to get pregnant if one partner has a penis and another has a vagina. Ways to perform manually stimulate your lesbian sex partner include : > - performing a hand job by holding their penis firmly and gliding your hand up and down; ask your partner which speed and pressure they’d prefer > - gently rubbing or massaging the head of their penis touching and rubbing their scrotum and perineum, which is the area between the scrotum and anus A types of penetrative lesbian sex include : > - penis-in-vagina sex > - penis-in-anus sex Lesbians shouldn't forget : > For penis-in-vagina sex, missionary usually works Lesbians need to use birth control because : > Often, people assume that lesbians can’t get pregnant, or that lesbian sex can’t result in pregnancy. That’s a myth based on the assumption that both women are cisgender. Discussions on the advocate that people have a right to a genital preference, BUT ... https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2019/12/14/refusing-date-trans-people-transphobic
1
>How about attempts to cancel someone for refusing to kiss a transgender woman he had shown interest in when he didn't know she was trans... > > >https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-ginuwine-accused-transphobia-refusing-kiss-amanda-prestigiacomo Did he get cancelled or did a couple no name twitters make posts that went nowhere? As far as I can tell he still had concerts scheduled precovid. There was even support for him in the situation. I do however, love the fact that you linked an article purposely misgendering someone. Really shows how the movement isn't about hate.... >How about tweets than some lesbians are men? > >https://i.redd.it/avekno29xlk61.jpg A tweet with someone's opinion? Didn't even get much support. I thought this was a huge issue? >How about mainstream health articles redefining lesbian sex? > >https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/how-do-lesbians-have-sex#sex-varies Guess you missed the part where they said ultimately it's up to the people participating. It seems like ultimately a lot of what bothers you is people's *opinions*. You realize you can still call it whatever you want to, right? >Discussions on the advocate that people have a right to a genital preference, BUT ... > >https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2019/12/14/refusing-date-trans-people-transphobic Not only is this yet another opinion (one based on a study) but it specifically says nobody owes anybody sex. So ultimately none of these answered my question, AND you linked an article with bonus transphobia. Edit: no rebuttal. Shocked.
-15
Ah yes obviously all trans people are rapists, aren’t you a genius
15
No, but many DO rape by coercion. "fuck me or else you are a transphobe who's gonna get canceled" or as many of them are fond of saying "choke on my girl dick" is rape. Not all trans people engage in this - but that's not the whole point of superstraights. They are born with who they are attracted to and they shouldn't have to suffer for that.
9
There seemed to be quite a few trans people that were supportive of the message. The reasonable transgender posters and super posters could both agree problem isn't the trans people or the straight/gay/lesbian/bi people, it is the superphobic bigots pushing the agenda in the name of the transpeople that is the problem.
6
Trans people usually aren't the problem, but the toxic "trans community" often is.
-7
>many who? I've literally never seen anyone say this apart from FOX News caricatures and trolls.
9
Just because you don't see something doesn't mean it isn't real. You've never seen an atom, yet they are real.
-4
I've also never seen a unicorn. are they real too? as for atoms: we can quantify atoms. I've never seen an atom myself, but I know they exist because there's proof they exist. we have models and many multitudes of scientific data to prove it. is there proof for your statement?
6
They ARE the national animal of Scotland. The proof in my statement is in the statements of that now deleted subreddit. Go over to r/detrans and see all the hate that people get for deciding they aren't trans. Ask my bestie about how dating as a lesbian is when you aren't interested in biological men - about the death threats she gets when she turns people down and about how she's been banned from platforms for having a prefrence. Ask all the people on gendercritical what it's like to try and stand up for women-only spaces. There's nothing wrong with not automatically taking one person's word for something - but there are many, many people out there saying the same thing. The only problem is - Reddit tends to ban those places so folks like you don't GET to see their points of view.
-1
>Go over to r/detrans and see all the hate that people get for deciding they aren't trans. I don't think it's that simple. there is a bit of a problem with people shouting over detransitioners, I will concede there, but there are many detransitioners who will use their experience as a justification for denying treatment to many trans people (**NOT** people who are unsure of their gender identity) and how they need "mental treatment" or something rather than transitioning. these types are likely who are getting the hate, since they're essentially putting up the middle finger to trans people who actually *need* to transition. but when it comes to genuinely well-intentioned detransitioners who just want their experience heard, I do agree about people being a bit too "ban happy" so to speak. ​ >Ask my bestie about how dating as a lesbian is when you aren't interested in biological men - about the death threats she gets when she turns people down and about how she's been banned from platforms for having a prefrence. the "biological man" part is what gets me here. how did she go about it? did she just say "sorry, I don't like penis"? or did she say something like "EWW NO, YOU'RE A MAN IN A WIG! YOU'RE DISGUSTING!!"? neither of these would justify the death threats obviously, but I think it's safe to say that one of them is going to be counted as rude more than the other. ​ >Ask all the people on gendercritical what it's like to try and stand up for women-only spaces. yeah...this would be like asking race realists about what it's like to "stand up for white people". considering most gendercritical people think of trans women as men in dresses who want to rape your kids or whatever, and considering how many have either encouraged me to kill myself or have been hateful pieces of shit in general, I'm not going to take their opinion seriously.
5
If you are going to be extremely critical of people's views because you don't like where they are coming from, then you'll never be able to see the whole situation. Look at the situation with some empathy and be aware of the propaganda that you've likely internalized as truth.
2
>If you are going to be extremely critical of people's views I'm not critical of their views. infact, I've seen most of them firsthand. ​ >Look at the situation with some empathy again, I have. I feel empathetic for detransitioners who had their entire life ruined because of undergoing HRT. I feel empathetic for women who have suffered at the hands of either men or trans women. however, empathy doesn't mean it should just be allowed to happen. detransitioners advocating for the ban of HRT for trans people is going to make those same people suffer the same pain they felt. GC people trying to push the idea of trans women being "predatory rapists" is just going to dehumanize a minority who (for the most part) just wants to live a normal life. etc. ​ >be aware of the propaganda that you've likely internalized as truth. such as?
2
When I say "critical" I mean, stay critical - use your ciritical thinking skills. You should always be a little critical of the things you take in just to evaluate if you are being lied to or not. The destansitioners on /detrans are mostly just sharing their stories about how they feel they were encouraged to transition because of social pressures, and about how many of them feel like they have made major mistakes listening to others. They share about how their friend groups turn on them and demonize them the moment they decide they aren't trans. It really highlights the toxic elements that are wrong in that community - it's not about people trying to ban anything. Give it a read-though. As for propaganda - there's a lot of it floating around these days and it's intent is to shape your views in more ways than I can count. Be aware of what you are looking at and how it's trying to influence you - compare it to things you know to be true and look at your foundational beliefs.
1
What is "that community" though?
31
Lol that was quick never heard of the sub til yesterday
9
If you haven't get on tiktok before its too late and watch all the super straight content. I am liking tiktok more and more everyday. Reddit is WAY WAY WAYYY too controlled. So it won't be long before the chinese overlords running tiktok turn it into another safe space.
31
You people all need some girl penis. Bigots. ^/s
26
fuck this, i only got to be a part of that glorious sub for one day :(
19
and r/TotallyStraight still exists? Outrage!
21
Fml. I thought that was a satire sub.
9
there's also r arethestraightsok too. Then again, considering the open racism they allow on blackpeopletwitter and whitepeopletwitter I can't see how any of us are surpised
0
I wish there was a warning attached to this.
16
Suck the dick, bigot
9
Mfw i'm gonna have to post a selfie of me with a cock in my mouth to keep my account the next time a reddit mod feels like it. I'm scared.
9
/r/fucktheccp
5
r/fuckthewesternliberalsdoingccpsdirtywork
3
What was that subreddit about
12
Super Straight is a gender identity for those who prefer biological women/men vs. non-biological men/women. They can't help it... they were born that way. But reddit apparently doesn't accept all genders.
-9
[It was just created recently for some anti-trans trolling and shitposting from 4chan apparently](https://uploads.dailydot.com/2021/03/antifashgordon1.png?fit=scale&fm=png&h=700&ixlib=php-3.3.0&w=294&wpsize=fp_1600_700) Just obvious trolls getting shut down, nothing unusual or interesting
1
What's a Kiwi farm?
1
I have no idea, that's what came up with a quick google
1
Seems like they took a legitimate thing and amplified it for lulz and hate.
1
Obvious garden variety trolling, anybody getting their taint twisted about it is just doing it to make a scene
2
Not surprising at all..
2
Banning Superstraight and all the other things that have disappeared from Reddit and the power of a disingenuous AHS just reminds us Reddit not all of it but most of it and growing like a tumor is a toxic, delusional echo chamber. Heading towards terminal. You step out into the real world and talk to real people or even other parts of the net and you just shake your head and laugh and say it's just Reddit. Eventually something else will take it's place. So you peruse what's left before the lights go out for good or you just get bored and sick of it. Remember boys and girls it's only Reddit. The R is for Red and Rot.
1
Here’s what we do: click on every ad, but buy nothing. Just deplete advertisers budgets and make Reddit a less attractive ad platform.
2
There are billion leftist furries clicking every ad pandering to LGBT or selling horse dildos or whatever.... we simply don't have the numbers. Reddit is a dead platform but still popular because the right can't fucking make up their minds and get on alternatives in big numbers.
-5
Good.
-6
All Nazis should be banned
8
And who will decide they're nazis?
-4
well the guys identifying as nazis and using nazi iconography is probably a safe bet tbh
6
That's not who they're going after at all. The kind of people you're describing make up a tiny percentage of the victims of the punch-happy faction. They are more or less drawing a bullseye around their arrows.
-6
It's a conscious choice made by weaklings, they decide for themselves, both by embracing fascism and by "outing" themselves. Personal choice, basically.
-8
Oh man a private company chooses to do things. How dare they.
6
Imagine saying this after 5 years of silicon valley monopolies solidifying their power over the masses and controlling the flow of information. Just admit you don't want information to be open and equitable. You want authoritarian leaders deciding what you can and cannot say. I'll never understand leftists or anyone else who get hardons for censorship done by private megacorporations.
-6
Hmm let's start with regulating all companies first.
-10
I'm just hear for the tears of homophobes
8
Does our sexual identity offend you? Are your superstraightphobic? \#BornThisWay
-5
Got one!
10
Please tell us what sexual preference we are allowed to have.
-8
I'll take "missing the point" for 400, Alex. It's not about you, dipshit.
7
My sexual preference is my sexual preference. My body my choice. My Truth is my Truth. Love is love.
-2
Youre not convincing anybody lmao Your facade is a 4chan ploy stormed up by pencil-dicked incels who are mad because homosexuals exist. Fuck them and fuck you.
4
Me or anyone else preferring biological women is not anything you need to care about. When a homosexual wants to suck cock, it doesn’t concern me either. Please explain why personal sexual preferences and genders are any of your business
-1
Digging in your heels. I've seen the threads. You don't fool me.
0
What a Chad lol, tell em
1
These edge lords think they're clever, and are attempting to use leftist rhetoric to confuse leftists. The trick is to make it subtle, and they're laying it on *super* thick. Subtlety is not something the Right is good at. Never has been.
1
Lol literally nobody on the left fell for that bs. It was a completely transparent effort from the start.
1
Exactly. So these people being all mad about "being judged for being straight" or whatever are just trying to strawman the actual issue.
1
No they're trying to point out inconsistencies in modern moral thinking.
2
No, they're really not. Don't be a sucker.
1
That's not being a sucker; it seems clearly the point. If you believe this is some kind of secret transphobia, you're the sucker.
2
Lmfao okay pal It's not secret transphobia. It's right out there. I've SEEN the 4chan threads talking about the purpose of this bullshit. You being ill-informed and buying into the bullshit makes you, indeed, the sucker. You're an idiot.
2
Yeah man I get it, I said that this was clearly created as a troll sub. But that doesn't mean they're wrong, and the point is not transphobia.
1
>point is not transphobia Yes, it really really is. *I saw the fucking conversations about it* Why is this hard to understand?
2
Because you're wrong. What conversations do you think you saw?
1
>Because you're wrong. Easy to say coming from a guy who doesn't read between the lines. You need at least an 8th grade reading level to understand subtext, in my experience. I saw conversations where they laid out how Super Straight shit is supposed to work and what it's purpose is. If you're not going to speak from an educated standpoint, then do us all a favor and don't speak. The adults have it under control.
2
So, I just need to take your word for it, even though you've not really even made any coherent point or explained anything?
0
I mean you were the one who said it isn't transphobia. Guess who has burden of proof? It doesn't matter. You're dedicated to shoving your head up your ass. Go be illiterate somewhere else, pissass. You and your 4chan buddies can get hit by a bus. EDIT: Looking at your post history, you're not arguing in good faith anyway. You seem like a conservative and you get nothing but my disdain. Sorry you're inferior. :)
2
* The burden is on me to prove a negative. * Delving into my post history as if that proves anything, except that you're a desperate degenerate. * I'm automatically wrong and not even worthy of your enlightening discussion because you think I'm a conservative.
0
>I'm automatically wrong and not even worthy of your enlightening discussion because you think I'm a conservative. Yes. If it quacks like a duck, etc. Get over it.
2
What? I don't even follow what you're saying. Is this like some ego trip where you think I'm a 4chan troll and you want to prove you can out-troll me or beat me at my own game or something?
0
Not at all. What you have to say is irrelevant, uneducated, ill-informed, tone-deaf, and brain-dead. I'd care more about the opinions of a seagull. I'm talking down to you because you're gum on the sidewalk, or a ball of lint from my belly-button. Of course you haven't had great luck with subtextual content, so maybe these metaphors I'm using are a bit beyond you. *C'est la vie*. You are not worth taking seriously, based solely on the content of your opinions in other subs. *THAT* is what I'm saying. So do the entire world a favor and put your hands down a garbage disposal so you can't inflict your vitriol upon an unsuspecting public any further.
2
So it is something like what I said then.
0
Whatever you want to think. Just think it somewhere else, preferably far away from me. Stupid tends to make me break out in hives. Have a wonderful evening. Or don't - I don't care.
2
True but that doesn't mean they're the ones in the wrong.
2
Yep. All the other stuff does though
0
You already told on yourself. I mentioned homophobes and you accused me of attacking you. The only way that could be true is if you're a bigot.
-2
I said stuff about homophobes and you said I was talking about you. 😂
-61
Yeah. Because dumb fucking trolls aren’t half as clever as they think they are. Oh look a bunch of retards still think they’re clever-you’re not. It’s blatantly obvious what you’re doing and shit like this is gonna get you guys a free brick wall when the day comes.
45
Straightphobe
41
Warned for straightphobia.
16
History will show what's really going on here.
-4
Which is what?
10
That you are the bad guys. That you cheer on tech censorship. That you literally cream your front holes or whatever at the thought of a faceless goon deciding was the masses should discuss.
10
Get a load of this breederphobe.
2
ABHBAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
15
Okay, I'm willing to talk. So, what exactly did you think the SuperStraight movement was? I thought something retaliatory like this was eventually going to happen, after a decent while of the more-vocal-and-toxic parts of the trans community calling straight people that did not wanting to engaging in romantic/sexual relationships "transphobes". If I really wanted to be petty, I could flip the script back to the trans community and question if they are being "cisphobic" with the existence of things like [Nocissexual](https://archive.vn/V95M9) and [Trans Loving Trans](https://archive.vn/JMA2E). But I won't because I believe all people should be allowed to be picky about whom they pursue romantic/sexual relationships with. Being able to trust someone else with your love and/or their genitals is such an intimate experience, I wouldn't have it any other way. And just because a straight person isn't romantically/sexually interested in transpeople doesn't mean said straight person can't have amicable and friendly relationships with transpeople in other aspects of life.
7
Why do you hate me?
-10
No one outside the internet is persecuting straight people for exclusively being attracted to other cisgender-heterosexual people. I’m sorry the internet makes you feel that way.
5
No you are not.
-9
Actually you’re right, your delusions aren’t my problem. Get help.
6
[Thanks for revealing to me that you're a fraud. And also one that immediately jumps to the "you're a nazi" ad hominem as well.](https://imgur.com/XnCQTWv)
-4
What you people are going to realize soon is that arguing in bad faith just exposes you as a fucking moron. Also at the time I wasn’t allowed to comment for a full 10 minutes from a warning, kinda sounds like censorship. I’m sorry but your SS group violates the beliefs of my religion and I figured an anti censorship group would accept my beliefs. Also dawg you know people can just look up the things people say online, right? So when people who do vocally support neo-nazi groups, or ethnic cleansing, or hatecriming lgbt folks flock to SS you know who your base is.
4
I'm the one arguing in bad faith? Aren't you the one doing so by: 1. ...claiming to have been censored by the mods here, but not providing me with proof when I asked you to do so? In case you don't remember, but this is r/RedditCensors. It wouldn't be the first time that someone claimed that some mod somewhere censored then, but they've all provide some modicum of proof with some sort of screenie. The thought that you're a fraud wouldn't have even formed if you provided some sort of proof in the first place. 2. ...starting out by saying something like > shit like this is gonna get you guys a free brick wall when the day comes. but at the same time, in your DMs claiming that > I live in one of the most “sjw” places in America and lemme tell you no one has ever, ever given me shit for not being into dudes and being in a hetero relationship with a cis woman. **People don’t fucking care.** So which is it? Because it looks you do seriously care that much about what other people do in their homes. Why do you care so much if the people around you don't care?
0
People don’t care that you’re heterosexual. People care that a group of society’s waste is using hate group related terminology (while using a facade of sincerity to claim it’s a coincidence) to troll people who already deal with harassment on a daily basis. You know why you don’t talk this shit in real life, right? Because you know you’d be ostracized, not censored. Because the people around you would see what a toxic little shit you are, to invest this much time harassing people over what they do with their bodies. Honestly I think you all get off on it. Once again-none of this is clever. Troll harder newfag.
3
> Because the people around you would see what a toxic little shit you are, to invest this much time harassing people over what they do with their bodies. I will agree with you that there were some number of unfavorables within the SuperStraight community, though my number is probably much smaller than yours. "There will always be a few bad apples." But what the fuck, "the pot calling the kettle black" much? This "movement" wouldn't have even happened if the toxic and vocal branch of the trans community didn't call "super straight" people transphobic for excluding said transpeople from their sexual preferences. Basically in your words, "transpeople investing this much time harassing 'super straight' people over what they do with their bodies". I've already said, "I believe all people should be allowed to be picky about whom they pursue romantic/sexual relationships with." Despite the bad apples, I believe that there were a lot of actually genuine folk within the Super Straight community. But whatever, you don't want to see that. There are no shades of gray for you. All you want to do is see the world is black and white. I choose to agree to disagree, and leave it there.
0
And what I’m telling you is this boogeyman of what you picture trans people and lgbtq advocates to be is a sham fed to you by brietbart and internet trolls. It’s not really black and white, it’s more like 80% of you were into hate groups and hard right propaganda and the other 20% of you are scared of something that isn’t real, and got cucked by the other guys.
4
At this point, I think we're both too deep in our own separate rabbit holes to convince each other. As I just said in my last post: > I choose to agree to disagree, and leave it there. Please do just leave it there.
2
You mean you’re smoked
5
I don't know what "smoked" means, but... You think the community was mostly hate groups and hard-right group types that were misleading a small number of lambs. I think the community was mostly genuine, albeit formed out of retaliation, with said retaliation attracting a decent amount of bad apples (hateful anti-LGBTQ-idon'tknowtheentirething types, false-flaggers, etc). I don't think we're going to convince each other even if we were to continue to argue/talk. So, seriously, I really mean it. I choose to agree to disagree, and let's just leave it at that.
2
There's a difference between exploiting a system to make a point because it's the only way you can be heard, and just trolling in bad faith. The former is a legitimate method used by all political leans. Yes the sub was not entirely genuine. But when it exposes hypocrisy and discrimination, that doesn't matter.
2
This is the Internet. And yes they are.
3
free brick wall sounds like a threat of execution by firing squad.
0
I’m sorry you feel that way. You gonna cry? Maybe shit and cum?
2
>It’s blatantly obvious what you’re doing and shit like this is gonna get you guys a free brick wall when the day comes. Is that a firing squad reference? That sounded an awful lot like a death threat, "Professor."
-1
I don’t see anything in that phrase that references violence? I’m sorry you’re so hypersensitive.
2
>I don’t see anything in that phrase that references violence? ​ I think you do. People getting lined up against a wall before they are shot is a reference so familiar as to be a cliché. When you pretend to not get it, you show yourself to be a person devoid of integrity. ​ > I’m sorry you’re so hypersensitive. ​ Goodbye, troll. We're done talking with each other.
2
It’s like you almost get it
1
These people are not serious aware enough, they'll find a way out of their Echo chambers or just die mad I guess