Comment on: /r/nottheonion locks thread about asking errybody in Baltimore not to murder for one weekend when obvious conclusions are drawn.
Next year in Constantinople.
4
19 Jul 2017 14:22
u/11111100100
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Compilation of Comments Censored in /r/worldnews in Wake of London Terror Attacks.
We should make a betting pool for how long it will take him to do his best fireworks impression.
15
05 Jun 2017 16:48
u/11111100100
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Priorities: in the aftermath of yet another terrorist attack, /r/unitedkingdom's mods are hard at work preventing "hate speech and overheated comments"
There's no such thing as legit hate speech.
1
05 Jun 2017 15:14
u/11111100100
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Priorities: in the aftermath of yet another terrorist attack, /r/unitedkingdom's mods are hard at work preventing "hate speech and overheated comments"
This does make them complicit in the next muslim attack or atrocity.
21
04 Jun 2017 19:12
u/11111100100
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/science welcomes discussion, so long as you tow the party line
> and only leads to giving exposure to something not rooted in reality.
Which gives an excellent opportunity for a teachable moment. That is responding with something that disproves whatever claim is made and hence educating the readers.
This works great for stuff that actually is easily disprovable, like young earth creationism, perpetual motion machines or flat earth-theories. It doesn't work very well for global warming skepticism or sexual or racial cognitive disparities. For disputing those heresies only censorship and shutting down the discussion seem to work. Which is because those are either a lot more nuanced than people like you pretend (climate modelling) or the prevailing theories are simply outright wrong (race and sex differences).
2
03 Jun 2017 09:28
u/11111100100
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/science welcomes discussion, so long as you tow the party line
I think it's hillarious to post racist studies about IQ in r/science. The cognitive dissonance must kill the sperg faction of the mods there. To see stuff they realize is obviously true yet have to deny in order to stay in the good graces of the SJWs.
4
02 Jun 2017 19:42
u/11111100100
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/news bans a user for posting a sourced list of hate crime hoaxes
It doesn't take much effort or discomfort to make a few shallow cuts, or just make up a story after you've been injured for some other reason.
Think about it, if a grown man wants to hurt a woman he can *easily* kill her with his bare hands. With a knife, [forget about it](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf0ZyoUn7Vk&ab_channel=Base).
In Sweden we've had something like 10+ claims of Swedes tearing off hijabs. Zero witnesses, zero convictions and IIRC one or two proven hoaxes. All of the "victims" had connections to islamist groups explointing the political system for political gain and funneling money to the Muslim Brotherhood and other nice people.
Muslims always lie.
Edit: reading further, the claims are that she was cut with a knife and had her head stepped on. That doesn't sound like someone tried to kill or maim her, since she's alive and able to talk. But it sounds very much like the sort of violence you read about in cases where muslim men "disciplined" their wives or daughters. That is, explicitly degrading without causing too much damage to what they consider to be property.
10
15 Apr 2017 12:50
u/11111100100
*
in r/RedditCensors