Comment on: It's is asshole design; everything adobe does if. Guess the mods are Adobe employees? Idk anymore, they didn't clarify
If you don’t understand technology, that’s ok. That doesn’t mean that a program saying it may not be compatible with the file you want to open is not asshole design though.
1
17 Feb 2024 13:39
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Banned from Reddit and LGBT
Poe’s law is strong on this one. Genuinely seems like you’re actually upset about that
1
15 Feb 2024 21:25
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
Skip the other two, only respond to one. That’s credible.
1
13 Feb 2024 23:37
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
No, no, we want to hear from you! What qualifies someone as trans? You clearly have a list, let’s hear it!
1
13 Feb 2024 21:25
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
Interesting. What are the qualifications to being trans? What’s the checklist? Most would say that regularly identifying as the opposite gender would be all that’s needed, but you clearly know more. Have you published your research and minimum qualifications for being certified as trans? Many would be interested to know, I’m sure.
2
13 Feb 2024 21:14
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
Not one of them said that. All three say that they had multiple identities, and that police have chosen to refer to her as a woman
1
13 Feb 2024 21:11
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
ABC, CBS and Newsweek. Those are the actual sources. You can’t discredit reality because you don’t like it
1
13 Feb 2024 21:07
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
The person regularly identified as both a man and a woman. If that is not the textbook definition of transgender, there is no definition.
1
13 Feb 2024 20:06
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
I don’t think you understand how reality works. You found a single article that confirmed your bias, and to you that is the unquestionable truth. You stated that multiple news outlets confirmed what you said, however none I found said what you say they said. This indicates that, most likely, your source sucks. Newsweek, ABC13 and Click2Houston (which are all very reputable) do not say what you claim, so in the end it is you who is incorrect.
1
13 Feb 2024 19:17
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
Yes. Most people read one. I went and checked 3. You’re simply wrong that this is clear evidence, you saw it in one article and now everyone is required to know what you saw?
1
13 Feb 2024 19:12
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
That’s not in the three articles I read. Only that they were identifying her as a woman, though they knew she had many aliases including male names.
1
13 Feb 2024 19:07
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
If the person regularly identified as a man, that is a trans person. Are you saying that they have a certain set of actions to take before they’re “qualified” as trans?
1
13 Feb 2024 18:58
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
The person was trans though. That’s not in question. Apparently they were born female but had several male identities as well
1
13 Feb 2024 18:44
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Tiz whatiz
News reports initially said she went by multiple names, both male and female. Now they say that and add that police have chosen to now identify the shooter as a Hispanic female.
It wasn’t made up, they just didn’t see the additional update
1
13 Feb 2024 18:41
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: I was banned for using the LGBT acronym 🤡
We need to just limit it at LGB.
1
10 Feb 2024 02:09
u/Affectionate_Cabbage
in r/RedditCensors