???????

Yet the majority of people see anti-mask posts as political. Who cares if you shouldn't wear it in the car?

Well that's how most people view it. Masks and vaccines used to be a scientific decision, but then around summer of 2020 whackos on the right decided to crusade against them. There's still a barn near me with a faded and hanging "unmask our kids!!" sign on the side.

WPT is super toxic. I spent like a week there and got banned for some dumb reason too. And I even generally agree with their politics.

It's political because conservatives have made a practice of hating immigrants and saying ignorant things about them, like "speak american!!!!"

Political because of the moronic antimask/antivax movement.

Following basic rules makes you enjoy soybeans? Weird, I'm drinking my coffee with literal real milk in it and I can follow basic rules. Maybe If I keep following basic rules I'll need to swap to soy? How long does it take?

No, you were banned for breaking the rules. What's confusing about that?

Na, it's a clear attempt to dismiss the idea that we have a massive problem with fascism in this country, similar to claiming J6 was Antifa. I understand the term perfectly.

Na, it's the feds comment.

Yep. False flag nonsense. Makes no sense either since the alt right is proud about their nazi love.

Na, only if you think the alt right is all a false flag. Dude got banned for saying the Nazis were just feds in costume; makes no sense when the Proud Boys are out there *proudly* spouting off their nazi shit. I've never met a Jihadist, but that doesn't mean I thought 9/11 was fake.

Good 1! I can see you're a deep thinker with valuable things to say!

Oh no I love going outside. Avid outdoors enthusiast!

Bad faith argument. Tons of people openly admitting their far right views in this country and dressing up as nazis. It's a massive issue and one we need to deal with - dipping into silly false flag theories only distracts from the problem.

You got banned for your silly Fed conspiracy comment, not for saying you've never met a nazi.

1: Reddit has always leaned left in general. Lots of women and young college aged people use it, and those crowds also both lean left. 2: Conservative censorship is as bad if not worse. r/conservative will ban you for literally anything that goes against their narrative. 3: A lot of right wing posters violate basic rules of reddit by falling into bigoted language or using hate speech. This parlance is common on the right, but is against the general rules of society.

You're qualifying. There's no reason to attack that story, true or false. Imagine how much of douche you sound if you go around telling Jews only 5.9 million people died in the holocaust, not 6 million. It just makes you look like you've got an agenda. I still think you do.

No one needs to lie, you were just stirring the pot. Seems like you have an agenda to push and wanted to push it.

Pretty easy to attack a SS of the comment; many people do.

Ok so you made up the part about Dems wanting to ban guns and you acknowledge that all those western countries have less gun violence by far because of gun control. I think I made my point. Good luck!

We don't know what OP said.

>I meant democrat voters, not politicians. There are tons of examples of far-left Americans calling for the abolishment of civilian-owned firearms on twitter, tiktok, and on college campuses. I don't care what a few people say, I care about laws. >I wasn't talking about communist shitholes. I specified "free" countries, which was meant for that imply the Western world. And how are the gun deaths in those countries per capita? You're making my case for me here.

LoL! Rager alert!

No, pushing an anti-gun control agenda makes you a gun nutter. And that makes me sound like a normal sane adult.

lol k

>Some American democrats absolutely do call for the abolishment of civilian firearm ownership. Most of them recognize it's a pipe dream, but if they could snap their fingers and make it so only the government had guns, they'd do it. Please link me a bill calling for that. I'm curious to learn. I follow congress closely and haven't seen anything. >In other "free" countries, eliminating civilian gun ownership is on the agenda of liberal politicians. They would prefer that only the government has firearms. They sometimes make small exceptions for manually operated long guns to be used only for hunting. The countries with the strictest gun laws are almost all authoritarian. Your theory doesn't pan out in real life. China, Russia, many places in Africa and Asia. Not exactly liberal places.

>If a government decides to ban all civilian firearm ownership, that is gun control. If somebody argues against that, it doesn't make them a "gun nut." In other words, you can support reasonable control while also being against draconian measures. No one is suggesting that. Gun control is about responsible laws and safety, just like all the other small freedoms we give up for public safety.

SS?

What's your goal with all this? Ok, some of the stories about Oct 7 weren't true. The vast majority were. Why the need to argue this? What does it achieve? Again, yes, Bibi and others have allowed Hamas to exist, turning a blind eye to Qatar's funding. What purpose does this serve pointing this out? It was a bad plan and Hamas should have been dealt with sooner; it wasn't. It doesn't change the fact that Hamas are the ones bent on genocide, or Iran are the ones funding and pushing it. >Right wing Israeli government doesn’t represent all of Israel ask the families of hostages or people who protested every Saturday before OCT 7th What is this supposed to mean? Honestly, I think I see why the mods banned you. You aren't wrong, but that doesn't mean your goal isn't to stir up shit.

Na, you were banned for being ignorant and contributing nothing to the conversation. It's a thread about the ukraine/russia war, not for you to air your lack of understanding of how funding and government works.

Yep!

Lol k

Nope

Nope

I used to think that was just a casual insult to throw at people, but then my dad decided he was a libertarian. After endless hours of talking to him about it and seeing the absurd logical gaps in his thinking, I started looking at the movement a bit closer. I'd say *maybe* 10% are "true" libertarians. The rest just want rules for other people but not for them. My dad is certainly the latter.

You posted a sensible opinion on Rogan. That place is for RW trolls. TBH surprised they didn't perma you.

Too bad that's not remotely what OP did.

You base your entire opinion on an ideology off one conversation you had with a stranger on the internet? Dang, that's bold.

lolol

You should try talking to actual women; you might learn something.

I mean, you're pushing misogynist bullshit, of course you got banned. Feminism is about equality. You're one of those special cases than things women are all out to get them.

Kinda like Milei cracking down on worker's rights, women's rights, and abortion. The "libertarian" hero, funded by a billonaire and pushing alt right culture bullshit. A story as old as time.

"We like weed and want to pretend we aren't racist knobs"

No, I do not see irony in putting someone in jail for committing crimes.

r/libertarian (and most libertarians) are just conservatives in the closet.

Na, righties just tend to be hateful and ignorant which goes against most sub rules.

Na, no one cares what a few right wing whiners post here. "I said racist shit and got banned wahhhh" You can have this safe space to cry about it.