I started to learn in middle school / early high school.

I was self taught, and I used Minecraft plugins as my medium for learning.

I would create random plugins that modified the way you played the game or did random things.

It's in Java so it teaches you a popular Object Oriented Language.

I'd recommend it maybe not the Minecraft part anymore but I don't see why not.

There is no default constructor defined, it wont even compile. This is Java.

Well assuming this is Java, it wouldn't even compile.

There is no "empty constructor" (Default constructor) defined. So, new Girl(), will not compile.

Racket is fucking shit

I think the article is retarded.

It's extremely easy to get started programming nowadays.

Especially compared to when you had to write code by hand and then get it stamped and all.

Sure, you can't inject code straight from the OS boot screen.

But any "programmer" who complains about downloading an IDE being to complicated is not with a dime. How lazy.

And often times as with Python you don't even /need/ one, you can just use note pad.

Agreed, but Software design is apart of programming.

Therefore, OOP, (Object Oriented Programming) would include OO Design inherently.

Well, we are in /v/programming, with an article on programming.

So... But yes, it can

Well, usually Object Oriented is abbreviated OOP. Object Oriented Programming, but yea.

I personally like Object Oriented Programming it makes a lot of sense to my brain and it works and is powerful.

Procedural always seemed very lame.

But, OOP isn't for every project out there, there are a lot of project wheres Procedural / scripting is way better for the job.

I thought you mean Object Oriented, not Operator Overloading.

But yes, fuck operator overloading.

Figured with me playing this again, it could use a repost.

Alright, yea, agreed.

I was just wondering, because I was a bit confused when it was marked opinion.

Thanks for taking the time to respond.

What article? This submission isn't an article its a link to a repository?

I just have a question. Why mark the submission as opinion?

It'd make sense to do that if the submission was an article about GitHub disabling a repo for using the word retard. But, isn't it true that GitHub did infact disable a repo because of the use of the word "retard"? There's no denying that.

Whether or not it was a good / bad thing is the opinion, but this submission purely links to the commit of them removing the word retard.

I understand that you think the COMMENTS are going to turn into a pool of opinions on the matter, but then shouldn't every post get that flair? Since 90% of threads have opinions in the comments?

There must be a better way to go about what you wish, because I've seen multiple fact submissions labeled 'opinion' when infact its the comments that are opinionated.