> The event was both LEGAL and non-political as stated on the event's about page. lo,, can't you read? they clearly said it wasn't political!!! how could it have been political!!! /s

That's just too much noticing for Reddit bro, they have no choice but to remove it. Go to a win site instead.

yet the extremist sub "politics" remain.

Quick, someone make them put a confederate flag on it, and when they don't sue them for racism/sexism/etc... Identify sexually as a confederate, so it's sexual discrimination. As per the last court case, they should have to bake the break, or be bankrupted.

Yeah, that sub should be name TwoManyChromoaomes

At this point, on retarded websites, mayonnaise is a race.

> This is not censorship Yes, it is: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ > ##Article 19. > Everyone has **the right to** freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to **hold opinions without interference** and to seek, receive and **impart information and ideas through any media** and regardless of frontiers. Any media, like Reddit.

Doxxing, botting, making lists of users automatically tagged by scripts to downvote. https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/comments/6c5mpw/rtwoxchromosomes_proactively_banning_again/ I'm on that list, I've got my "star of David", my speech is literally being suppressed. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ > ##Article 19. > Everyone has **the right to** freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to **hold opinions without interference** and to seek, receive and **impart information and ideas through any media** and regardless of frontiers. Any media, like Reddit.

Nope, that's where you're wrong kiddo.

Same. But who cares, it's like being banned from a dumpster fire you weren't giving attention. What's next, HRC is not going to invite me to a pedophile party? lol

Gonna use it to upvote trump users.

Because it implicates tge dnc.

An anonymous source at the FBI has said that shotspotter was deactivated that night.

"An ex-FBI saying muh russian narrative ..." Color me surprised. Lets just run bullshit after bullshit backed by "totes the fbi" until anonymous sources means nothing, only their actual evidence.

Nit only just one guy ranting, but on guy with a conflict of interests.

> what happens when your ideas clash with Reddit's next narrative? What happens when your idea clashes with the next thing which is not Reddit, private, but kinda has grant from the government, but is technically not the government, and your posts calling it out get censored?