Last time someone talked specifically about displacing Jews so that his people could have living space, he sent them to gas chambers. While braindead college students may be convinced that it’s “just a chant for freedom,” it’s pretty fucking obvious what it means if you know where the river and the sea are.

They will live at peace under the compassionate rule of Hamas. As we know from tik tok and far leftie Reddit, if we just secure a ceasefire Hamas can go back to living peacefully and never doing anything bad. They love Jews in fact, they just don’t like zionists.

>like any cold then >that's not likening it I mean...

I read the first bit and this is written by somebody who knows enough to think they know waaay more than they do. This is probably somebody who has taken Bio I and decided they could write a confirmation bias driven analysis of COVID. For example: >If the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test. The genome has been sequenced for a very loong time. Like since before COVID was an everyday name in the US. >A couple of symptoms, maybe contact with a previous patient, and a test of unknown accuracy, is all you often need. This is not scientific writing. This is op ed writing. This is not sourced and the author will likely hide behind the fact that this is presented as a haphazard matter of tone. This reduced the process of developing a diagnosis and cuts medical reasoning down to a passive and diagnosis seeking algorithm. >While the definition of SARS, an earlier coronavirus panic, was self-limiting, the definition of COVID-19disease is open-ended, allowing the imaginary epidemic to grow. Yes, they are two different diseases. "People are totally cool with beetles, so why do they hate German Cockroaches?!?!?!" >Putting aside the existence of the virus, if the COVID-19test has a problem with false positives (as all biological tests do) then testing an uninfected population will produce only false-positive tests, and the definition of the disease will allow the epidemic to go onforever. No discussion of sensitivity or selectivity. In fact the test has a *much much much* larger problem with *false-negatives.* >The COVID-19test is based on PCR, a DNA manufacturing technique. When used as a test it does not produce a positive/negative result, but simply the number of cycles required to detect sufficient material to beat the arbitrary cutoff between positive and negative. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there are cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a couple of days. This was written by somebody who watched half of a youtube video on PCR and would fail any Genetics I pop quiz. PCR does not "manufacture" DNA, it produces copies of a specific sequence if that is present in the sample. So, if your sample has some of the requisite (RNA in this case), the PCR templates will match with it in an exact fit and create copies through many cycles. Cutoffs for tests are not "arbitrary" they are based on careful statistical analysis. **OP, your guy is writing at a 12th grade level and has nothing new, important, well-informed, well-researched, or useful to say.** This is a fool stricten with a severe case of Dunning-Kruger who knows just enough about science to write convincingly to lay people, but has the scientific chops of a freshman who is failing his classes and contemplating changing his major.

Look at his post history. He's a racist, but he also sometimes types in a sassy black dialect. It's fucking weird.

Oh boy. You do realize that you're exactly as the same as the people who blame white males for mass shootings, right?

OP keeps posting "he didn't like FBI crime stats" and won't show the actual conversation. I'd bet dollars to donuts that OP was being legitimately racist.

As soon as a shooter is loosely associated with T_D it will get the 8chan treatment. I think that they will ban them sooner though. They will find 3 comments that sympathize with the El paso shooter and claim that they weren't moderated fast enough. It's exactly how they got them into quarantine.

I dont agree with this. I have to appreciate the consistency though. I'm going to call it, this is to soften the blow then they ban T_D within the next week.

Completely civil comments removed and the thread locked. This is what this sub is all about.

I agree 100%, it's why I have moved from the left to the right. I don't like people telling me what to think and how to act.

The left is becoming the new cultural authoritarian party. It's a crazy world when liberals are telling you not to say mean things and conservatives are voting for a New Yorker who cheats on his (third or fourth) wife with a porn star..

Yeah, but T_D also deletes comments. The fact that they're clearly delineated as a one sided political fan club and not an objective forum for debate is totally unimportant. **/s**

>It's clear enough to see why they're so rabid about Dr. P. They're like Christians talking about Richard Dawkins lol. It's funny because in 2011 atheism drove me away form the religious authoritarian right, and now the same style of arguments are being used by the cultural authoritarian left.

Reddit is very pro-gun. Vote bots are very anti-gun. Big surprise.

He's talking about how T_d is moderated by the reddit Admins including being barred from the front page and other forms of sweeping censorship, not about T_d's self governance.

>negro problem Seems like a justified ban to me.

I agree. A permanent ban is a bit much.

>Yeah, fuck you too you goddamn Tans. I think that would get you a ban from most subs just for being a personal attack.

News is even worse. It's a massive echo chamber.

I'm not saying that it's illegal by any means, but it does set a bad precedent. If the reddit community allows the admins to censor view points with impunity then as soon as management changes they may come for yours.

I really don't see an issue with something being stickied by a community and then being liked and therefore upvoted by members of a community.

That's bullshit though. Stickies will always be upvoted, just because you don't like a community doesn't mean that you should demean the right of users to vote. And other subs don't only do that, but openly votebot and vote manipulate on other communities. They punished t_d for something that is an intended mechanic of the site while allowing vote botting.

Can and should are different. If Walmart posts signs saying "Trump supporters use the back entrance," then there would be backlash. Everyone is fine with companies attacking groups of people as long as they're not part of that group.

Coontown was an openly racist subreddit. People who have never been on t_d like to compare it to coontown because literally the only argument they have is that T_d is hate speech. They can't even support that with posts,but they hear it like crazy on their far left subs.

Implying coontown was anything like T_d. The people who complain about hate speech have never even visited the fucking sub. I still have yet for someone to show me an example of hate speech being up voted en masse.

T_d's stickies are blocked from reaching the front page and T_d can't even mention other subs in the title, but there are posts from MarchAgainst and r/esist on the front page all of the fucking time with screens hots of T_D. It's all great until this precedent is allowed to stand and the admins come for your point of view or beliefs.

Well actually, check out share blue.

Blocking stickied threads from the front page, setting the vote count on posts to 0, and editing comments isn't censorship? What is then?

T_d has been calling for that for a long time. It's a disproportionate application of the rules to target a group specifically. Spez has actually been caught editing posts on T_d and the admins have set vote counts on posts to zero.

So we're mad that they aren't censoring pro-Trump view points?