Okay, can you come up with a reasoning that isn't "I disagree with you" or "Your opinion is problematic" or "You're covering for bad group x y or z"? Why is having an unpopular opinion of an internationally publicized incident, in and of itself, worthy of a *permanent ban*? On a video game sub? Really? Inb4 "hate speech" 1.) He mentioned (let alone attacked) 0 protected groups, directly or indirectly. 2.) Even if you were certain his unstated opinion is hateful (which you aren't), bans shouldn't be handed out for things he _didn't say_. There were no dogwhistles or direct implications either, just OP saying he *has an opinion*.