So what did he say that was intelligent?

I haven't refused anything. You're the one cu posing to not answer the questions you were asked first. You clearly know you're wrong or you wouldn't be scared of them. Good bye

Because they campaigned on them, wrote the bills and passed them. Order of operations. You haven't answered the questions I asked that came before yours. So no I will not participate in your unethical deflections. I'm sorry that you're scared of answering questions that would force you to admit you either don't follow your stated beliefs or you know would prove you wrong but I will not coddle you.

No. Democrats are actually pushing for longer sentences for things like rape if the person is convicted. The left is not letting them go when found to have committed the crime. I'll address what you're asking as soon as you answer my questions that you have chosen to skip. I won't participate in your deflection.

What did he say that was intelligent? To me intelligence would be articulating his argument without contradicting himself. Being informed on policies on both sides. Knowing and using the correct terms. He hasn't done any of these things and he has done many things that to me would point to low intelligence, like not understanding his own statements, misusing terms, generalizing to widely, and more.

They have worked to expand definitions of what is considered sexual assault or rape. They have worked to increase protections for survivors including being able to terminate their leases with protection, they have increased funding to testing rape kits, they have removed exemptions for domestic violence that allowed abusers to receive less severe punishments for assaulting a partner than they would if they assaulted a stranger and more. They have reduced loop holes that allowed marital rape to not be viewed as a crime. But you think these things are nothing. Why? Because they also believe that people who are not proven in court to be criminals have a right to bail? Do you not believe in "innocent until proven guilty"?

You're dismissing domestic violence and sexual assault as political agenda. You were very clear about that in multiple comments.

He doesn't seem intelligent to be honest. He contradicts himself repeatedly.

So youre dismissing crimes and criticizing those that dismiss crimes... You state that they an campaign on crimes as long as it's "rampant" enough (which domestic violence and sexual assault both would meet the definition of). So that sounds like you're just justifying the things tour side campaigns on.

So how can any political party care about a crime and not campaign on it then? What does the right care about that they don't campaign on?

You don't think liberals care about crime when they actively campaign on things like addressing wage theft, rape, sexual assault, domestic violence and other crimes?

It's kind of wild to complain about a sub, while supporting one of the lot censored subs on Reddit. Conversations is notorious for pedantic and ridiculous bans even amongst right leaning individuals.