Lisp was invented in the '60 and it's syntax is still just as unacceptably stupid and unwieldy now as it was back then. The single "killer feature" of homomorphism isn't worth paying the cost of having an awful syntax.

Ruby is dog slow and has the most pozzed community around, except for maybe JavaScript. Even that tranny who pushed the Linux CoC describes herself as a "Ruby Coder".

I voat for C and Lua.

Isn't "parent" also offensive to trannies and faggots?

If you want something fixed properly, you want a software engineer, not students.

You need to post the whole code, including the return statement. Ideally as a self-contained test case. Just because you think the bug is in a particular line doesn't mean it is.

You'll figure it out. You have no choice now. Good luck, kid.

I wanted to like Rust, but it just isn't a good toolchain for systems programming, despite what the designers and fanboys like to claim.

Another internet argument won. I'll add it to the tally.

lol, not taking about you specifically -- I'm just pointing out a very common pitfall in that line of thinking.

Ok. Still interested in your answer though. I want to know how good your tolerance for errors is.

Am I?

That you're a non-programmer trying to school a professional programmer.

What does this do in C99:

1 << 16

...?

When you hire people even less able than Pajeets, at 20x the price...

Yeah sure, there are a few smart women in tech. The jew reverse engineering the ARM Mali GPU drivers seems pretty smart too. They're a tiny, minuscule minority though...

A wall of text nitpicking someone's use of cd? That's a little bit tryhard isn't it..?

And that's exactly what they say about people just a little further left of them.....

then I see shit like this and realize I am good enough

That's just as much of a trap as the opposite scenario though. The world is already full of smug "experts" who think they're hot shit because they're better than 90% of Pajeets they see on Stack Overflow.

lol the stuff on the left isn't even the worst of it. What about:

square(4)

Calling square() on a known constant and then throwing away the result......? lmao....how inadequate do you have to feel about your coding ability to create a photo like this....?

Tranny programmers:

git add CoC.txt
git commit -m "u white, cis homophobes mad now?"
curl -u tranny:passwd -d status="Haha, eat shit white males" http://twitter.com/statuses/update.xml

So I assume that it can generate code for any platform GCC supports?

In theory yes, but I wouldn't be surprised if something in the D runtime was deemed a roadblock for 8-bit support.

cynically my ass. they are full on coolaid drinkers.

Cynical acceptance usually morphs into coolaid drinking... That's why I wholeheartedly reject the "server-side" JavaShit ecosystem, even if they occasionally produce something useful.

Microsoft have cynically embraced JavaShit. They know there's money to be made pandering to low IQ pseudo-coders whose minds don't stretch beyond glorified scripting.

Who cares though? GitLab is mostly open source and self-hostable, unlike GitHub.

Believe me, I know all about GitLab's degenerate antics. A few months back they had a post-receive hook that printed a huge gay pride flag in your terminal after every git push.

Yeah, I use GitLab when I have the choice -- but I'm still forced to use GitHub sometimes when the choice is not mine to make...

How was it "required"? I've been using it with javaScript disabled for months and it's only just become unusable in the last few weeks.

I have JavaScript disabled be default and only whitelist sites that I use that need it. It worked before, now it doesn't. What do I need to "know" before talking about that....? You fucking prick.

The old one is too insecure, fragile, and subject to political pressure

What a novel idea. I wonder if anyone else has had that totally unique and original thought before....?

Most faggots who think of themselves as "unicorns" are usually anything but...

Python is about as trendy as having AIDS.

Garbage collection is just about the least "exciting" thing I can think of.

Building a PC was for the truly tech savvy

Not really. Building has PC has always been childs play. It's barely any more complicated than lego.

Text editors! What can be simpler? On each keystroke, all you have to do is update tiny rectangular region and modern text editors can’t do that in 16ms.

This guy is clueless as fuck. It takes someone with very, very little understanding of software to make this statement.

There's many different classes of software. The comment about the Python script he quotes is actually pretty reasonable if it's just some disposable script you run only a few times. It only becomes unreasonable when thousands or millions of CPUs are running it over and over that it becomes worth rewriting for efficiency.

Observing that 90% of developers are worthless trash is pretty trite. Sturgeons law applies as much to software as anything else.

Most software is not on the same level as building construction or aircraft design. Not even close. People who do that employ pros, not soy drinking JavaScript faggots.

Indians don't use the loo. Street shitting is their culture.

Marxism wasn't a fuck up. It functions pretty much exactly as designed -- promise naive idiots the world for just long enough to seize power, then have them killed if they complain about your lying.

Next up: binary search trees are inherently problematic -- the left node is always less than the right. Red-black trees are also racist against niggers and Injuns.