So angry.

^ The definition of a Peterson supporter summed up in one *intellectual* comment. This is perfect.

**I SAID GOOD DAY, SIR.**

I really don't care. Peterson's shit is weak. They're probably contesting things he's written and just have to footnote. Pretend I'm a climate skeptic on Peterson and I don't give a shit that nearly all scientists believe in global warming (I'm not), but just treat me the same as those retards and move on. Peterson is a weak intellectual if we're calling him that and I'm fine with his censorship. Good day, sir.

I admit I barely looked at your link. I'm very familiar with Peterson. He's got quite an act. Nobody worth a damn in the scientific community is puzzling over his nonsense. Except angry young men that don't have science degrees.

Suzuki has more accreditation. The guy's a hack and you're being snowed by his diplomas. Use your head.

Nah. He's more revered as an entertainer than a scientist. It's like calling Gavin McInnes a historian.