Republicans are the ones pushing the theory, despite every intelligence agency saying otherwise? The theory that OP is pushing is literally a talking point for years? Anybody aware of the politicization of this issue?

On January 25, 2023, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had failed to adequately oversee a grant to the EcoHealth Alliance for research into bat viruses at the WIV.4 A month later, the Department of Energy, which oversees a network of 17 U.S. laboratories, concluded with “low confidence” that SARS-CoV-2 most likely arose from a laboratory incident. The Federal Bureau of Investigation said it favored the laboratory theory with “moderate” confidence. Four other agencies, along with a national intelligence panel, still judge that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from natural zoonotic spillover, while two remain undecided. All U.S. intelligence agencies rejected the allegation that participants in a clandestine Chinese biologic weapons program intentionally developed SARS-CoV-2. From an article from the new England journal of medicine in late 2023. This is why what you said is misinformation, despite what Republicans want you to believe, neither Democrats nor dr fouci paid the Chinese to bake it up in a lab.

I promise you that you don't know shit and I hope you don't have animals since you have no qualms abusing them.

Ok but their system isn't bad because of their gun laws, furthermore, our shitty drug policies with their mandatory minimums do nothing, and your solution is the fundamental problem, you and the justice system in America I. General sees it as punishment and not a correctional facility, you fix the problem that motivates the crime, you fix problems that cause addiction not jail addicts, you dont out a ten year sentence on gun charges, you take away the guns from people who shouldn't have them, which means tighter regulations, not outright bans.

Your entire argument hinges on the proposition that guns would be outright outlawed, or that all of those guns in circulation would become contraband, which is not the case, people in England, Australia and indeed all of these places which we seek to model their gun control have plenty of legal gun ownership, with the most stringent requirements for the average person being a legal reason to own one, which usually includes both sport and self defense.

Mexico's gun problem is literally entirely our fault lmao

Gun laws are not strict enough due to third party sales and gun shows that make it all to easy to get a gun that can't be traced through the line back to you. The problem is the laws are not as good as your comment would imply they are. It's so easy to get these guns that people from neighboring countries (latin American ones) are buying them off the black market from people who buy them here and take them there. Our gun problem is so shitty it makes other countries have gun problems.