So basically this was a punish everyone at the expense of a fraction of the group sort of thing. That slack comment received a total of 3 reactions to it. The active user count in that channel at any time is in the single or low double digits. When it was posted to the channel it already had 10k upvotes. When it was taken down it had 66k. I get it. Just wish y'all made a different judgement call. Doesn't seem right or smart to me. Thanks for giving us more information at least.

Several politicians have spoken in favor of Ranked Choice Voting. But talk is cheap. And only one of candidate has it on his website: Andrew Yang.