Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>Your specific argument was that the difference is that it's illegal, not that it causes harm. This is what we call moving the goalposts.
Usually illegal things do cause harm. If you feel more comfortable with only focusing on the harmful part and not the illegal part, that's fine.
>I'd also argue evading arrest in and of itself doesn't cause harm but whatever, it's besides the point.
Of course you would. If evading arrest was legal then we wouldn't have a justice system.
1
27 Apr 2021 04:43
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>Do you not understand it's illegal to execute someone for resisting arrest?
No one is disputing that.
>Also I could easily change the rape analogy to be your daughter was drinking while at a party and she was only 20 and she got raped.
Drinking doesn't harm others. Evading arrest does.
1
27 Apr 2021 04:07
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>Like yeah, if he didn't resist arrest, maybe he wouldn't have died.
Illegal.
>But also if he didn't go out that day maybe he wouldn't have died.
Not illegal.
>If the cop was moderately competent, maybe he wouldnt have died.
Also true.
>Like if your daughter/sister/mother went to a party and got raped, it would be correct to say that if she hadn't gone to the party, she probably wouldn't have gotten raped.
Do you not understand that it's against the law to resist arrest?
1
26 Apr 2021 20:33
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>.... so then stop justifying the killing of people who are resisting arrest lol
I didn't. You're mistaking cause and effect with justification.
1
26 Apr 2021 00:19
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
That's also the case in the US. Being shot for running from the police is very rare and obviously not allowed. Your brain has been melted from propaganda.
1
25 Apr 2021 21:02
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
How are you this dumb?
We don't have tyranny, we have a judicial system. Running from the police is running from the judicial system.
1
25 Apr 2021 20:10
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>You do not have the freedom to resist arrest
Correct.
1
25 Apr 2021 03:18
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
Given the context clues, yes, you are stupid.
1
17 Apr 2021 16:18
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
Because that's a fucking stupid line of reasoning.
1
16 Apr 2021 21:15
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
Why did she wait 26 years to shoot a black man?
1
16 Apr 2021 20:54
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
You would agree that there is more evidence that this was an accident than not, right?
1
16 Apr 2021 16:21
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>Your assertion that it was an accident is based on nothing other than speculation
No, it's based on what she said and the fact that there is no motivation to shoot someone in that circumstance.
1
16 Apr 2021 16:08
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
What would be her motivation for doing so?
1
16 Apr 2021 15:16
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
Still no data?
2
16 Apr 2021 15:08
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>You assume it was an accident.
Yes because she shouted "Taser! Taser! Taser!" and has basically no motivation to shoot him.
>In either case it is her fault.
It can be both her fault and an accident.
0
16 Apr 2021 15:08
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>And you finally admit you are not concerned with justice
You're really dumb. I care about justice. Daunte did not. The officer will participate in the justice system.
>proportional response
This wasn't about if the response was proportional or not, it was an accident as far as we can tell.
>but want nothing but submission to government through violence
Yep, that's how the police work. If you want to negotiate this fact in the field you might end up like Daunte.
>You are now assigned to reflect on your irrational and tyrannical desire for violence and submission to authority.
How is a right to a fair trial "tyranny"?
1
16 Apr 2021 14:49
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>In either case, procedure should be to not resort to escalation of violence when the suspect is trying to leave.
No, they should beat their motherfucking asses in until they submit. I don't give a shit about someone who doesn't care about justice, I care about law-abiding people who could potentially be harmed by a suspect fleeing. We're lucky he didn't crash into someone else.
Getting arrested is not a negotiation. Part of the problem is that cops have to be so hands-off with suspects today. A cop can't choke-hold or punch someone resisting arrest, but they can empty a mag into someone if they threaten a cop.
0
16 Apr 2021 04:09
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>shot someone in the back
She didn't shoot him in the back.
What do you think her intent was? Do you think she shouted "Taser! Taser! Taser!" while knowing that she was holding a gun?
5
15 Apr 2021 16:38
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
No not at all. If he followed orders no one would have reached for a taser.
3
15 Apr 2021 16:36
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
And by resisting arrest you've guaranteed that you aren't innocent and you will be behind bars.
2
15 Apr 2021 16:05
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
You're not getting it. I'm not advocating that he should have been shot. I'm saying that it would have never happened if he didn't resist arrest.
I can't emphasize this enough: If you want justice, don't run from the justice system.
5
15 Apr 2021 16:03
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
Where is the data for "no resistance"?
3
15 Apr 2021 16:00
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>Not gonna argue about who here is brainwashed.
You said that there is an "overwhelming amount of cases where there is no resistance and an officer still ends up murdering who they should be arresting." What is your definition for "overwhelming" in this context?
>But we can take a step back and see how other countries are able to subdue even armed assailants without killing them more often than not.
That's the case here. Obviously.
Seriously, look up some numbers.
6
15 Apr 2021 01:59
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
>There's an overwhelming amount of cases where there is no resistance and an officer still ends up murdering who they should be arresting.
You have been *thoroughly* brainwashed. It's extremely rare.
Resisting arrest is a good way to make the situation more dangerous though.
6
15 Apr 2021 01:05
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors
/r/whitepeopletwitter will ban you for an an accurate statement
84 107 comments 14 Apr 2021 22:41 u/bluthru (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Quarantined subreddits are no longer viewable on the redesign without being logged in and having verified your email
So this pretty much confirms that they’ll be getting rid of the old (good) design.
6
24 Jan 2020 08:38
u/bluthru
in r/RedditCensors