Absolutely, but how is this reflected in the code?

I feel like this is where algorithms tend to lose me (probably because I'm a retard who never got a high school degree), BUT I feel like the amount of children one has is a fairly useless metric. Some shitty moms have zero kids, some have one or two, others have eight or nine. We're told that rich and/or educated individuals tend to have less kids than those who are poor and/or uneducated, but I don't believe this should cause an any assumptions that cause an increased value for any particular woman. Spreading your legs is easy. Raising a child is hard.

What is that woman doing to better her children? Does she even really care? Does she read to them? Does she emphasize a decreased use of social media and internet usage to them? Does she pass down meaningful traditions from her ancestors? In my opinion these are all "sub-metrics" that would increase or decrease the value of a women. However, I have no idea how to even begin expressing these traits in terms of pure, cold, objective code.

I have been carefully observing my wife taking care of our daughter for the last year and a half and after having done this I firmly believe that there are hundreds, if not, thousands of seemingly minuscule ways in which we can judge women and mothers.

How many cows is the average western woman worth?