It has been my observation in life that, for the purpose of who to stick your genitals in, there are really only 3 groups:

anyone below a 6/10 is unfuckable.

And then there are people who are a solid 7-8. And finally there are people who are 9s and 10s.

In other words:

People who are worse than me. People who are about as good looking as me. People who are better looking than me.

Because the value of beef is unrelated to whether you would want to have sex with someone, I can thus conclude there is no correlation, unless you're some sort of animal fucking muslim or scottish (and that scale only applies to sheep)

But if you ARE a muslim, who happens to be surrounded by women, rather than your traditional partners, farm animals, the scale is something like: $535 per women, less $50 for every 2 lbs over 120 she is.

For your safety though, please consider:

The value of a liberal is: $0 (also covers muslim women, feminists, etc)

The value of a jewish women is: $0 (also covers fugly women, butterfaces, etc)

The value of a women with a fat mom: multiply by 0.5

The value of a women with a liberal mom: also $0

The value of a women with a jewish mom: about the cost of a cremation, i.e. negative, a bad investment.

If we're talking about an either-or decision, get with a women, or buy the farm (a literal farm, not the expression "bought the farm", i.e. died), then it's a little more complicated.

A study found for 'peak happiness and emotional well-being' the ideal income is $95,000 a year.

"Happy" marriages may not count sex as the only factor, but unhappy ones often do. So as a baseline, happiness can be linked to frequency of sex.

Assume the guy making $95,000 is spending half that on hookers, or something that makes him comparably happy.

On average a 'happy couple' has sex 54 times a year, about once a week.

95,000 / 2 = $47500 / 54 = $879.62, the value of one roll in the hay.

Now, for a cattle ranch (again, "buying the farm"), the cost to run it comes up as "including employer's share of payroll tax (USDA ERS). The total annual cost is $6,550 for the 200 cow ranch farm. The average labor cost per cow is estimated at $32.75."

According to the following link, https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1716&context=extension_curall a cattle ranch with 200 cows can expect to return $325.41 per 200 cows, or $1.62705/cow.

We now have a means of conversion.

$95,000 / $1.62705 = 58,387 cows. / 2 = 29,193.5 cows / 54 = 540 cows per week.

Thats a lot of cows to manage just to be happy.

Or a lot of cow fucking.

A wife will do me just fine, thank you very much.

the key traits for monarch test subjects are

1. high levels of introversion and social anxiety, this makes the subject easily pliable and influenceable with or without hypnosis.

2. conscientiousness and neuroticism, a follower mentality, for obvious reasons

3. a parent or family in a three letter agency, for clearance reasons. someone close to them to monitor and handle the subject.

4. preferably a military background

5. history of early childhood trauma

Ok.

The best part of of ASCII is it didn't accommodate gooks so it forced other cultures to learn english.

'Not all languages fit nicely into ascii', because all languages that don't should be dropped in favor of english.

You should be running rotten tomatos.

Half their problems derive from using methods that belong to objects, rather than relying on composition.

I really like wrapped operations to prevent overflows.

The ability to differentiate an unordered struct from an ordered one, and easy array concatenation/multiplication make my dick hard.

I like the addition of non-fallthrough switches with ranges and combined cases. Matching is better but arbitrarily complex branches is still one up on C.

I could go on but I'd just be telling you what you already know. Thank you for this.

This fucking guy went and made something thats actually worth exploring. A better C.

I'd rather go back to writing cobol than ruby or javascript.

No typing, not even optional typing.

On ruby's end, DSL-hell and "jajaja, performance increases every year, lets be as lazy and inefficient as pajeets. Performance, code clarity, and maintainability don't matter!"

Both communities: "It's 2018. Don't use [tried and tested library]! What are you, a caveman? Use brand new [xyz]! It's convoluted and requires [a] to do [b] in order to complete [c] so you can gulp/grab//jerk it nice and hard, because architecture isn't a buzzword!"

Meanwhile I'm over here "php is good enough for facebook, it's good enough for me, you nigger hipster."

Also, did you remember to fucking dockerize your work?

You didn't?

You fucking caveman.

VB.net jesus christ man. Don't come near me I don't want to catch anything.

this is an underrated comment. The difference is not all of us are masochistic enough to desire that our eyes bleed continuously from parenthesis. PHP: What is love? Baby don't hurt me no more.

If PHP is an abortion (and it is), and you're a programmer, sometimes you just have to get the job done and become an abortion doctor. The clinic is open for business.

Step 1. Determine what you're trying to solve

Step 2. Don't reinvent the wheel. Use what works and gets the job done. Nothing else matters.

Step 3. That was all the steps. There are no more steps.

Hammer->Nail