I literally linked it for you several comments ago If you actually spent 20 seconds reading you'd see it

You misunderstand- the laziness is that you put zero effort into understanding this subject before posting on reddit

>I will just leave this here Ah yes the "anonymous whistleblower" that is taken as 100% truth on the internet. You really need to learn to vet internet information better and apply some critical thinking

Yeah, I predicted your level of laziness so I posted the link for you in the previous message that you seeming didn't even read?

Pretty easy to google yourself, but based on how little effort you've done already I guess I'll paste it. [https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-02-27/u-s-agencies-divided-over-covid-19-lab-leak-origin-theory](https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-02-27/u-s-agencies-divided-over-covid-19-lab-leak-origin-theory) in 2022 it was 1 agency moderately for, 4 against, 2 no comment in 2023 it changed to 1 agency moderately for, 1 agency "low confidence" for, 3 against, 2 no comment Caveat 1 - one of the agencies for is the DOE which has little to no expertise in the area Caveat 2 - The CIA has confirmed the chinese government suppressed the Huanan market data (which all supports zoonotic origin) so they have unofficially endorsed that theory, but the CIA by policy never releasees statement on stuff like this

The FBI has since backtracked on this theory for the same reasons the CIA has never supported it. They've found a lot of evidence that the Chinese government has suppressed data linking the outbreak to the Huanan market. They don't want to be blamed for their wet markets causing a global epidemic and they don't want to shut them down. If it was a laboratory outbreak then it makes no sense for them to have done any of this. The WHO was eventually able to get China to restore the scrubbed data from GISAID that linked COVID to the wet market, but that was just one case of them covering it up.