Comment on: Some day we won't even need coders anymore
In any case. By this thing particles became bacterias, bacterias became humans. If we were to create something intelligent like human we would need to implement this feature.
Comment on: Some day we won't even need coders anymore
Actually I think there is a tiny little thing that distinguishes us (and all other living beings) from what we call machine - a random mutation.
Some day we won't even need coders anymore
168 86 comments 06 May 2017 19:53 u/hairytale (..) in v/programmingComment on: curl is C | daniel.haxx.se
Praise be to Ritchie and his prophet Kernigan peace be upon him.
Comment on: Stack Overflow's 2017 Dev Survey doesn't look good for Female Developers
I am actually surprised with dominance of whites over Asians. Where are those hordes of Indian and Chinese coders?
Comment on: Want secure software? Design it that way.
Agile/Scrum is not the fixed framework of rules. It is merely a bunch of ideas and conventions on how to approach specific problem - product delivery speed. Agile methodology doesn't say anything about quality or security of the product. But Agile doesn't limit using defensive programming, adopting code standards, code audit, testing, stabilization branches. E.g. you can set iterations of any length, or you can restrict commits to repo from all devs except the lead. Agile doesn't prohibit that. It is up to you what product you will get in the end.
From my perspective Agile is merely a buzzword synonym for "doing things right". I personally like Scrum because it eliminates bureaucracy and gives a lot of freedom to developers. But I agree that for quality applications you may need to add restrictions to your process.
Hehe, Visual Pee Sharp