I seriously STILL cannot tell if they’re a deep satire subreddit or if they’re actually being serious. Theyre not serious right. There’s no possible way they could be serious about that

Libertarians, the anarchist ones in particular, are so strange to me for this specific reason you eloquently argued against in the third slide. I don’t get how anarchist libertarians expect a libertarian society to be maintained without even minimal guard rails only enforceable by the state. And since most of the time their answer as to how this would be done boils down to some kind of “community policing,” a.k.a. mob rule, then they’re sort of advocating for the same exact thing they always rail against with the Muh 51-49 trope because it’s the tyranny of the majority. Sometimes in response to that they’ll tell me that “people can choose where they want to live”…yeah, like, okay. Many can. Many can’t. Living somewhere is not automatically consenting to everything going on there. I thought that was a basic libertarian observation.