"Spamming", huh. And it doesn't concern you that person A can get a license and person B gets to buy the gun with it - because they are Muslims. I indeed wasted my time with you.

https://i.imgur.com/VkCb2PX.png

> And how do you feel that more kids have accidental shot their parents than terrorists have killed people in the US recently? How do *you* feel about Canada having special (lenient) gun rights for Muslims? NO PHOTO ID! https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6861aa/london_man_grapples_and_disarms_radical_islamic/dgwe71f/?context=3 Regarding Lefties and SJWs etc., I agree 100% with this guy, and I *wished* (But can't expect.) that you watch the whole 7:53 of it, not just the first 2 minutes or whatever: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVrfGga7BUc And I just searched my whole comment history but couldn't find the YouTube link to Trump's speech from 2016 where he pointed out two examples where people without guns were taken down by Islamists *in the USA* because they had no way to defend themselves, one group of which were elite fighters who had to leave their weapons in some locker because they were in a no-weapons zone. That worked out well, didn't it.

> and you use /r/t_d. Which *links* to new sources / memes - many of which have to be read/interpreted very carefully, because just like in other subs (probably even more so), there's a tendency to pick and choose and over-celebrate - BUT: I have come to see *facts* about the MSM that I had never seen before (but suspected a little, because I had seen unacceptable bias and filtering in the MSM myself already) *on their own websites*, for example. By now, my opinion is this: People should try to dance on the dark side for a few days and then return to where they came. They will be richer. T\_D is *not* idiotic, and it is *not* a waste of time!

So, 34% of France are *clearly wrong?* How does that compute? Either the claim that they're wrong is incorrect (That's where my money is.), or them being so wrong would be a product of France, so in a way they would be correct (in that something needs to change significantly). ONE THIRD, man!

That melt down either didn't happen, or I overlooked it while browsing T_D for hours every day after I "discovered" it 2 weeks ago. My guess is the former. You can try to disprove me if you want, but in case you have some material, mind that I agree with bacon_flavored's response: > Yeah melt down have you even seen reality? We unanimously expressed shock at how badly France screwed itself and then stayed clearly how they deserve what they get now. If you still have something that justifies to say > you guys had a complete melt down when Le Pen lost then I'm highly interested in seeing it.

> without the spectre of racism being trotted out. Almost irrelevant by now, the word "racism" is bleeding out as we speak. - Thanks, Liberals and SJWs. You did the victims of *actual* racism a real favor ... might as well wear the clan's hood at this point.

> can say anything without reprocutions, be it threats, racism, etc. Just remember that the future, which will be somehow different, can look back to the present.

> I'd love to see where you interpret my post as a personal attack, Personally, I read it using the general "you", not actually the 2nd person singular, but if someone were to fall off that rail, your comment *can* be read to contain personal attacks: http://i.imgur.com/Gm2TpHi.png

The shorter the text, the broader the brush. The more often a point has to be refuted, the shorter the text.

Maybe you're right, but if other people take that comment seriously, too, there's fire, and this will eventually raise the question who started it.