Are they revisionist? thats terrible. What kind of stuff are we talking about, how bad is it? Can you give some examples?

You should get your fucking spelling in order and proof read your comments before you post them, you look like a fucking idiot like this! /rant

I understand how this looks, but allow me to defend /r/askhistorians for a bit. those mods are some of the muat unbiased and well meaning that I'm likely to come across. However the sub is very *very* strict in what comments it allows. This is understood and clearly and civilly communicated by the same mods. The reason it is so strict is that there is a lot of misinformation and vas history floating around, often perpetuated by people who think they know what they're talking about. /r/askhistorians is a place where myths like that are corrected and popular qurstions answered by credible (academic) historians. So they have to be very resolute in deleting false, nonsourced, speculative or vague answers. So I feel that, since this serves a clear purpose in the sub and the mods are completely transparant in how, why, and when they remove content, furthermore the deleting follows a strict set of rules and it seems not partisan and equally enforced to all parties, I would say that this is not censorship, it is curating content.