Getting sleepy there champ? Maybe a nap will help sharpen your reasoning skills a little. In your original comment you say they don't need to censor, and then you admit that they are a safe space because they censor dissenting content. I know I'm not going to change your mind, it's just baffling to me how you can't make that connection.

1.Let's argue semantics! >Congratulations, you played yourself. Said by you in response to someone who called you triggered, I inferred from context that you meant he was the one that's triggered. Perhaps I was incorrect but I don't think it's a big leap to see how I came to that conclusion. 2. Thanks! although I'm not sure why that deserves it's own point on your list. 3. I think u/sneakpeekbot has some good examples already posted in this thread. All three of those links contain some interesting and thought provoking discussion and facts. The problem is those unbiased facts are buried within obviously biased youtube videos and twitter infographics that are in no way verifiable.

I don't think any reasonable person could deny that there is botting, and groups that are paid to influence discussion on reddit. But here the mods are taking action against it, as they likely try do with all posts that are manipulated. If they've shown they're doing that there, you have to assume they're at least trying to remedy the problem, and that they found no evidence of such manipulation in many of the top scoring posts, meaning most that upvoted were actual people who didn't like Trump (there are a lot of them).