https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/docs/guide/atf-i-33104-%E2%80%94-federal-firearms-prohibitions-under-18-usc-%C2%A7-922g4-%E2%80%93 incorrect. Federal kaw specifically prohibits it if the person Is declared incompetent or involuntarily committed to a mental facility. Federal law supercedes any state law. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4)

I love America as well but you're conveniently ignoring things like the commonly known Tuskegee experiment, mk ultra, operation mocking bird just to name a few. If you love America as you claim, why would you be for the legal discrimination against a large percentage of Americans?

It's a complete overreach. Where is the line drawn? It's already law if you're declared incompetent you can't possess firearms

You're obviously ignoring all of history if you really think the government won't take every opportunity to suppress rights. What's your definition of mental illness as a qualifier? Is a diagnosis of anything from eating disorders to mild depression enough for you? What other rights can be legally chilled because of your comfort. Do we suppress the mentally ill's right to freedom of speech or how about their 4th 5th or 6th amendment rights? You still haven't answered the question, where is your "right to feel safe" codified in any law or constitutional right?

Where is that specifically a constitutional right? Knives while a smaller threat to the masses, are just as deadly. Do we need to take psychiatric evaluations to buy and keep those too or are we just going to do what the UK does and ban those as well? Can you cite a correlation between depression and anxiety to mass shootings? Yes people that commit mass shootings are mentally ill but banning anyone or taking weapons from people that have any amount of mental issues is an extremely slippery slope. It's shocking that you would want to give a government that much power to discriminate.

No, absolutely not. I'm not forfeiting my rights because of a moving goal post. The government should never be in the business of setting morals