No one said intentional murder. He is guilty of manslaughter. The only one misusing language is you

If being gay is so natural then why aren't the gay uncle hypothesis or sequential hermaphrotism discussed in my bible?? /s

Yeah it blows my how little money people in the US and other places received while in lockdown. I've been off work for almost 3 months cause of closures and have basically been receiving my full pay the entire time. A one time payment of $1200 is an absolute joke

I mean there is a huge difference between the education levels of the working class and the countries leading scientists, who are often foreign-educated. Universities throughout Europe, Australia, and the US are typically filled with wealthy Chinese nationals. This video even says that this is the team that identified the bat colony that SARS came from. I'd imagine they have some understanding and experience in handling and quarantining bats safely. I'm no supporter of China but its really not fair to compare the leading epidemiologists and biologists to any random bozo that happens to run a factory or a steel mill.

I'd imagine it's possible but less likely

There are plenty of other explanations of why China could be hiding this person. For example, they may have been vocal about the disease against censorship rulings, or critical of the government's response. It's also worth noting that it seems unlikely that the virus was transmitted directly from bats to humans. This is the third major coronavirus outbreak, following SARS and MERS. SARS was spread from horseshoe bats to civets, then from civets to humans. MERS spread from Egyptian tomb bats to camels, then from camels to humans. Especially considering the occurrence of the disease in trafficked animals like pangolins, it seems highly likely that the disease came through another animal more closely related to humans.

No doubt that the coronavirus originated from wild animals and spread to humans in Wuhan, but I'd be pretty shocked if it had come out of a lab studying the virus. Even in China, these top epidemiologists would understand the importance of quarantine and preventing animal to human transmission. For the virus to have originated from a wet market, with live animals slaughtered, prepared, and eaten in the same area, seems much more plausible. Those markets are a hotbed of disease, including SARS, and are operated by people who could not care less about emergent zoonotic diseases.

But biologists don't use the term gender in a scientific context. You wouldn't talk about a frog or a birds gender, you'd say sex. A biologist would never talk about the gender of a flower or gametophyte, we talk about their sex. Likewise with humans, we talk about sex in a biological context rather than gender. Saying that binary gender is a biological fact is quite simply inaccurate, and not a claim a reputable biologist would make.

I feel like abortion to school shootings is less of a valid comparison than criticism of Islam is to promoting LGBT equality, as Islam is directly opposed to homosexuality

I don't get how some people can simultaneously support issues like women's rights and LGBT rights whilst rejecting even the slightest criticism of Islam, no matter how oppressive and discriminatory the religion may be

The weird thing to me is that /r/news is infamous for censoring articles that may be critical of Islam or present Muslims in a bad light. Here is an article about abhorrent systematic detainment and persecution of Muslims, yet the mods censor it. If they really cared about Muslims they'd let important stories like this out.

If you posted something critical of Trump on T_D they'd ban you, and you'd be banned from all the anti-Trump subs. Just because someone comments on something from one sub doesn't mean they are part of or support that sub. Like you could just see the post on /r/all and the comment why you disagree then be banned from 35 subs at once

I certainly don't agree that all those comments deserved to be deleted, but after reading through a lot of them it is clear that many violated the rule three in a pretty basic way. Many weren't answering (or even addressing) the question, which is grounds for removal, as all top-level comments must be an attempt to answer to question. Any comments telling OP to watch the film or just talking about censorship definitely break this rule and should have been deleted. Its only a handful of comments that really don't seem to break any rules that were deleted