Did you miss the part where Israel took it off the table? It was offered in 67’ not 17’. 50 years of terrorism will do that.

Key words here are “Zionist occupying illegal land”. Hamas views ALL of Israel as Zionist occupying illegal land. Just because they changed the wording doesn’t make their goal and different. There’s no need to add any weight on research, all it takes is a little thought.

There is no hypothetical. Hamas #1 goal is the destruction of Israel. https://irp.fas.org/world/para/docs/880818a.htm Feel free to read for yourself as it is in their charter. Hamas also does not have the ability to destroy Israel. Israel on the other hand DOES have the ability. There is no hypothetical. Gaza is not literally destroyed. That’s just an emotional statement. So what hypothetical am I saying, exactly?

In any war you meant civilian casualties. Maybe Hamas shouldn’t purposely imbed their fighters, equipment and bases in civilian infrastructure.

It’s not though.

There is a reason. Hamas and Israel and not even I. The same category. If Hamas had the capability they would destroy Israel now. Israel *has* the capability to destroy Palestine and yet they don’t. You made a false equivalence between the two and you’re simply wrong. Instead of saying hey you’re right, I was wrong you doubled down. I can see why you were muted and banned.

Yeah and water is wet