And this is why people roll their eyes when somebody puts contributor or developer for open source project "blah blah" as a qualification in and of itself.
1. press ctrl+shift+h
2. put whitelist in the top box
3. put acceptlist in the bottom box
4. press okay.
That is literally all this person did. Maybe 10 seconds of work - 0 coding. Maybe less. Modern IDEs generally have awesome built in tools for refactoring so it may have been right click - refactor - name - okay. Things like this also make snicker when I see things like the recent article where somebody was outraged at instead of being asked to talk about their work on open source projects during an interview, they were asked to put their skills on display. They did not pass.
Policheck complaining about the term "whitelist" without explanation stinks of Orwellian/Marxist speech policing. I'm also sure the crowell poster is a controlled opposition post designed to achieve the goal of getting "whitelist" censored with less obvious language control. Programmers are likely already being targeted heavily for when the glorious revolution occurs.
16 comments
17 u/0x5f3759df 16 Jun 2016 12:58
The stupidity is almost palpable.
13 u/rwbj 16 Jun 2016 13:35
And this is why people roll their eyes when somebody puts contributor or developer for open source project "blah blah" as a qualification in and of itself.
That is literally all this person did. Maybe 10 seconds of work - 0 coding. Maybe less. Modern IDEs generally have awesome built in tools for refactoring so it may have been right click - refactor - name - okay. Things like this also make snicker when I see things like the recent article where somebody was outraged at instead of being asked to talk about their work on open source projects during an interview, they were asked to put their skills on display. They did not pass.
1 u/beetkin 16 Jun 2016 14:37
link to the article? wanna have some fun :D
5 u/rwbj 16 Jun 2016 15:00
The typically charged title. "Fuck you, I quit. Hiring is broken"
1 u/beetkin 16 Jun 2016 15:40
ha, im in the middle and can't stop xD too funny lol, how could they ask technical questions?
1 u/ForgotMyName 16 Jun 2016 17:37
Time to submit a PR to make it "CrackerList".
2 u/gregorypeckerwood 16 Jun 2016 17:41
How about 'NotOnWelfareList'
5 u/stretched_girl 16 Jun 2016 13:22
If breathing actually required thought, policheck would have suffocated long ago. How can someone so brilliantly stupid have survived this long?
5 u/durchfall 16 Jun 2016 13:30
I'm pretty sure policheck is an automated tool, so no breathing required!
1 u/stretched_girl 16 Jun 2016 13:39
Heheheh... So this is proof that AI's aren't so intelligent ;-)
4 u/carnold03 16 Jun 2016 13:40
Policheck complaining about the term "whitelist" without explanation stinks of Orwellian/Marxist speech policing. I'm also sure the crowell poster is a controlled opposition post designed to achieve the goal of getting "whitelist" censored with less obvious language control. Programmers are likely already being targeted heavily for when the glorious revolution occurs.
1 u/IdSay 16 Jun 2016 13:37
"i don't like the way you said "Black list" "
1 u/gota_party 17 Jun 2016 18:09
That's the sort of overt racism that made me leave github.
1 u/draco_nite 18 Jun 2016 04:29
Remind me to replace "whitelist" with "aryanlist" and "blacklist" with "niggerlist" just to piss these fucks off.
0 u/dchem 16 Jun 2016 23:35
Polichecklol, can't make this stuff up.0 u/Tommstein 23 Jun 2016 02:08
lolwat