The code in your banner is triggering me
34 11 Jul 2015 04:42 by u/spreglord
I'm going to assume it's C, where the fuck's the return type for the main function? Is it void? C always returns an integer from its main function. It's also good practice to have main(void) if you wont be using argc or argv. Is that in C89? That was dropped as the default in GCC5 gramps in favour of C11. Why aren't you using "//" for the title? It's only one line. Even if you do feel the retarded need to spread it across multiple lines then why aren't you using:
/*
*\t/v/programming
*/
Pls fix.
19 comments
13 u/mattfloyd 11 Jul 2015 04:56
I like your passion.
7 u/allcaps 11 Jul 2015 07:38
Bringing up the real issues.
3 u/sh1ttydefaults 11 Jul 2015 06:11
I pity the person who's going to come behind me and read my C# code. It's far from pretty but it is functional.
1 u/kuda 11 Jul 2015 20:02
Just two days ago I overheard a senior developer in my company explaining my undocumented spaghetti code to interns. It's so uncomfortable.
1 u/simery 11 Jul 2015 17:07
Proposal for new Header
1 u/e0steven 13 Jul 2015 14:55
Needs more 'magic'
0 u/taxation_is_slavery 11 Jul 2015 07:57
Okay, but we have a 400 page book of procedures that you have to work through before we can take action by farming it out to Tata or IBM in a no-bid contract.
0 u/TrayFly 11 Jul 2015 15:24
I vote we use C-INTERCAL for the banner:
0 u/effusive_ermine 11 Jul 2015 20:31
You really are a programmer, aren't you. Thanks for reminding me of some reasons to hate C.
0 u/jped 12 Jul 2015 08:07
Am I missing somehing? All I see is
0 u/justletmevoat 13 Jul 2015 03:42
Dude those extra asterisks in comment banners just ask to be wrecked. Don't impose additional overhead on upkeep to look after stupid formatting.
0 u/whatamidoingherev 14 Jul 2015 07:16
the fuck? \t? Nope. Definitely nope.