Who says girls can't code?

112    04 Feb 2019 14:54 by u/shmuklidooha

127 comments

0

She must ge really short... used to things going over her head.

0

HTML is not a programming language, it is a markup language. That is not coding.

0

Came here to post that.

TRUTH

0

You came here to post that? Wow, so brave. Fucking cunt

0
0
0

one of the shows that tries to warn us about (((them))) but then gets subverted anyways and starts to promote globalism. a sad sad decline ive watched too much of that show in the background

0

source? one of the main characters is a mossad agent

0

I’ve watched the fucking show they never trusted any of the collaborations and they only reason they did was because the chick slept with the agent and she grew on them emotionally and lots of fucked up shit happened because the chick was the daughter of the president of Israel everything was white and calm and this chick shows up and all fuck breaks loose no such thing as coincidence

0

Name checks out.

0

This comment makes no sense you fucking kike loving cucked out faggot

0

It's not even well done...

0

It's pathetic. My favorite was a p tag(why?) within h1 with a fucking in-line style. There's a goddamn style block at the top.

0

missing head tag, title tag, etc.

0

it's code, she did a code don't discourage her. dont forget to do the dew when you do code.

0

Is writing a voat comment "coding"? Because if not - then HTML isn't coding either.

0

If you're commenting using code, yes. Many of you have slang as your definitions to words. When you look up the definition any type of format based language is code.

This reminds me that the more I learn about computers the more 'god like' the definition hacking moves to for me. to most people changing a background color for google.com with inspect element is hacking or brute forcing is hacking a password. All seems like manual labor to me now.

0

It's close enough.

0

I was going to say this as well fuck these ppl are retarded

0

LMAO it's still code.

0

Not to mention she built a table with embedded styles. Only dreamweaver and moronic newbs would write html like that

0

Modding red alert looks harder then that.

0

Are there really people who write html <table> spec by hand in 2019?

0

It's used for emails to comply with old versions of outlook.

0

Like @shmuklidooha, I use it in emails.

0

You should see what my idiot boss did for a green field project we have. Yes, at least someone is using tables by hand in 2019. He is one of them. For page layout. Not even tabulated data.

0

sometimes that's the boss you want though, if it's all about money. "Hey I need you to make this complicated page displaying a bunch of data, I know it'll be a bunch of work so I'll give you a couple weeks before it's due." Me: spends an hour using a templating language to generate the page, waits a week, sends him the generated html and bill for 40 hours of work.

I haven't done exactly this, but I have done similar things where I use metaprogramming concepts to generate PHP or javascript, then the generated code is what I submit through git. It saves me time and makes me look good. If I showed my "boss" how I did it, I'd have to spend more hours educating him than if I had wrote the code by hand.

0

Tables are relevant for tabulated data. Emails too since some email clients are not that great on complex CSS. Not for laying out sites as a whole or form layout. I like to have people want to come back to me so I can make money from them multiple times so sticking to modern practices are important.

0

If it works it works

0

Scary isn't it? These people vote. That's what scares me the most.

0

And they make babies. A lot more than you.

What could go wrong.

0

Idiocracy. They'll be watering plants with Gatorade before the end of the next decade.

0

Im laughing so i wont cry.

0

They'll be watering plants with Gatorade

Monster Energy Drink! Don't you know it's $(CURRENT_YEAR)?

0

Is that what it was? Knew it was something like that.

0

Gatorade was so 2006.

0

But dude.. electrolytes

0

LOL

0
0

I can make this work.

0

thnx I'll have nightmares now knowing airplane software is written by chicks

0

I actually don't think any of it is. That shit has to work. If it was it was debugged by a man.

0

I'm just being a sarcastic bitch about that one woman who replied in this screenshot: https://imgoat.com/uploads/d686fd640b/192498.jpg

0

Is that even valid HTML?

0

It seems technically correct, except that <style> should go within <head>. There's a whole bunch of errors with regards to best practice though.

0

I don't think I have ever seen anyone use a semi-colon to separate attributes in an tag, and I didn't notice until I wrote it out but it is also missing an equal sign.

<table with "100%; align="center">

0

That code is not valid. She mixed attributes with the convention for style and made that tag fail parsing.

0

Notepad++ is what you use if absolutely forced to operate on windows

0

Which is getting more and more likely as it's looking like we're going to have to basically register our fucking pronouns to install a Linux distro.

If anyone is working on a non-pozzed, non-faggot OS, I am all ears.

0

vim runs on windows. every useful feature i've seen in any IDE has been implemented in vim, and I have too many years of muscle memory with vim to ever use something else. People who say use editor X or IDE Y, are kind of like somebody who would tell a professional guitar player to throw out his guitar and get a laptop because dubstep is the new thing.

0

Those tables are not correct either. There should be rows and they should not be nested in that way. Also the H1 tag should not be where it is.

0

It seems technically correct

It's riddled with inaccuracies, I'll assume it's part of the joke. Tables wrapped in tables, "h1" instead of "th" for header row. Having CSS and then defining styles in HTML. Unnecessary tabs, no header, no title, referring to formatting/styling as coding and so on.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="UTF-8">
  <style>
    table { border-collapse:collapse; }
    table.main { border:1px solid black;text-align:center;width:100%; }
    table,td,th { border:3px solid #17375E; }
    p.sansserif { font-family:Calibri,sans-serif; }
    .left { text-align:left; }
    .silver { color:silver; }
  </style>
  <title>Title</title>
</head>
<body>
  <table class="main">
    <tr>    
      <th class="left" colspan="4"><p class="sansserif">Title</p></th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
    </tr>
  </table>
</body>
</html>
0

Technically, as in it will run and display something. Though that could be said about any html, haha. It really depends on what needs to be displayed and on the context. Still a horriblle piece of code, looks like either a troll or someone who just learned to change the file extension on a txt file.

0

There's plenty of online HTML editors, https://html-online.com/editor/ if you want to take the time to write it all in.

The code produced a jumbled mess.

0

All those errors and bad coding practice with it but the thing that hurts my head the most are the 5 space tabs lol.

0

Nothing wrong with styles in a tag. Youre being pendantic.

0

It works, it's just bad form, specially considering that this person went through all the trouble of creating a CSS section and then goes on to use inline styles. The same could be accomplished with far less.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
 <meta charset="UTF-8">
 <style>
   div{border:1px solid black;}
   .t{clear:both;}
   .c{color:silver;float:left;text-align:center;width:24.65%;}
 </style>
 <title>Title</title>
</head>
<body>
 <div class="t">Title</div>
 <div class="c">Page 1</div>
 <div class="c">Page 1</div>
 <div class="c">Page 1</div>
 <div class="c">Page 1</div>
</body>
</html>
0

Nope. It might render but it would fail lint testing.

0

No.

table is not a valid child of table

h1 isn't a valid child of table either.

The missing closing tags for <p> is technically valid but bad practice.

same with the use of "bgcolor"

The CSS looks valid.

0

Never knows what flies with how loose some browsers are on standards. Either way that whole thing is a pile of shit.

2

One of those table tags isn't closed. IDK if this is technically invalid but it's not good.

It's not valid.

0

haha I didn't realize the h1 was within table...

0

Bwahahahhahahaha!

This is so entertaining.

0

the code looks like a penis.

0

When you're a fag, everything looks like a penis.

0

guess you are missing the joke of SMASH THE PATRIARCHY! proceeds to make some that looks like a dick.

0

Well, I for one will say girls can't use external CSS files, that's for sure.

0

This is probably the next lesson after learning to 'hello world' in HTML. Managing more than one file would be overload.

0

Or write valid HTML

0

So the story here is taking a photo of your screen instead of ctrl-alt-print screen (takes just the active window)? Yes I think a lot of people lack enthusiasm about their tools. I think men i work with in general spend a lot more time fiddling with the features their tools make available to them. No different than when my girlfriend wants to use the table saw. She hasnt any idea what that junk on the top does so she takes it off then pinches the plywood while ripping it and gives herself a nice bruise across her hip.

0

There's plenty of ways to print screen. I use the MS snipping tool since I can take screenshots and crop in one go.

I think men i work with in general spend a lot more time fiddling with the features their tools make available to them.

I think this applies to many things. Very often when I'm explaining how to do something to my wife, she only really cares about the step-by-step process, rather than the theory and reasoning behind each step. It's a very pragmatic approach to take, but it stops her from taking the initiative to 'discover' how to expand on the process.

0

Use LightShot, so much more useful then the MS crap

0

Also the markup is absolute garbage and invalid.

0

Yeah. It's a lame post.

0

No one said anything about a scripting language actually validating, I guess...

0

Yeah but it's easier to crop an image from your phone rather than from your computer... right? Right???

0

Fuck if I know, I don't use an InstaSnap

0

really make sure you get that background color in there!!

0

Advanced 1337 hacker skillz!

0

each table row needs to have it's font too! FUCK CSS, which was the whole point of the style section

0

I wrote better HTML when I was literally 8 years old and wanted to customize my Neopets page.

0

By ending her statement about not wanting the whole screen with a question mark, she tells us she can't code.

0

Why are there so many MALE BIGOTS out here? After all, it was a WOMAN (Grace Hopper) who invented COBOL and got the whole ball rolling in modern computing.

https://www.i-programmer.info/history/people/294-the-mother-of-cobol.html

0

Maybe tell the rest of the ladies out there to stop shitting all over Grace's memory and actually write some decent fucking code. I think you'll be amazed at how quickly the hate spigot stops flowing.

0

It was a man who invented the glorious C master language that helped make COBOL go the way of the dodo. Almost nobody uses it anymore. Most mainframes now are running Java. IBM even ships them with dedicated hardware for running high performance Java.

0

There are many women who have been crucial for computer science. They are a minority, especially these days, though. People have to consider that historically, something like mathematics and computer science was where people who were physically weaker and/or less sociable gravitated. Women get turned off math very young, but by college age, computer science is a real type of engineering that for some time was more suited for women than many other types of engineering. Similarly there are many female biologists. Anyway. Things are changing with the big diversity push. It used to be that a woman in CS was very smart, now it is more likely she is just there because of muh patriarchy.

I made another post on this page about working with women. The highly educated and intelligent ones are amazing, they do things by the book, and do things cleanly, they document things, and they are consistent. These women are not the majority though. There is a huge influx of women that have overdeveloped egos and underdeveloped skills.

0

BTW, steve jobs and billy gates didn't INVENT SH-T, THEY STOLE IT. Same with suckerberg who didn't write ONE LINE OF CODE.

0

That’s not accurate at all (well, the part about them being leftists is) but all 3 of them were developers and contributed code during the early parts of their companies starting up.

0

Bill Gates is actually probably the most intelligent engineer of those three. Steve Jobs was a sales and design guy. Zuckerberg was a jew. Steve coded but wasn't great, mostly he was from the era when coding was necessary to even use a computer. Zuckerberg can do php and javascript bullshit, but of course he didn't have any great ideas or capabilities, he just had the social network to make a website that took over.

0

Even Tesla admitted that WOMAN would take over the world, NOT MEN.

0

why go through the trouble of writing Calibri for the paragraph class if you're just going to use the an in-line style call for sansserif... ON EVERY FUCKING LINE

0

This post is making me want to inspect the code on most feminist websites. I bet their javascript has plenty of fun "features" to be discovered.

0

I used to be a fan of Ruby until I started seeing the professional code written in it by SJWs. The problem with a loose dynamic language like Ruby, is when you have 20 ways to do something and infinite ways to write your code, you have that many ways to fuck everything up. It's basically Perl 2.0 but this time with SJWs. The only upshot is IME, Rubycunts seem to be into unit testing more often than Nodetards.

0

I instinctually stayed away from Ruby; something about it just rubbed me the wrong way, even from the start. I like the openness of perl, tbh. It allows for some very creative fuckery. It was the first scripting language I learnt, and it just stuck over the years.

Hell, 90% of my linux box automation is done using perl, even though there are more-likely better ways. :p It's just so easy and fast to piece anything together, especially if you just need a simple script to quickly process/generate some random data in to something useful; what with all the modules, etc.

That's why I never even bothered looking in to Node.js besides standard familiarization, for professional reasons. Everything it does: perl already does, but better. It's definitely easy to write shit code which's still functional; however, that's why you always refactor. ;)

0

People should really be telling journalist harpies "learn to cook".

0

What will they be able to mess up worse, a meal or a script?

0

I don't think they'll be successful in either, I just believe in shaming women into tradition rather than employment.

0

In my experience, girls can code fine. The problem is that (some of them) bring on politics. I mean, only 1 of 3 of the black girls I know (at work) can code well, but even they are fine. Yeah, they don't seem to be as enthusiastic or innovative about it, but they're mostly competent.

The problematic ones are visible from outerspace. You can see their venomous personalities through walls. Most of them don't want to be coders. They want to be managers or execs, but they can't hack it, so they try to get sideloaded as assistants or coordinators. Toxic idiots who waste everyone's time.

0

Sure they can code. The problem is that those who cant are fed the idea of 'more women in STEM!', so they apply and companies hire them to fill in a quota and then everyone is upset when nothing is done. This creates a tension that ends in disaster.

0

Honestly, I think the shitty ones harass management and HR until they're bribed off with positions. And then they crony eachother in. It's an entire scam economy.

It's a social justice tax. Management carves the cost out of the working man's hide, too. Now he can't afford anything, and has to rely on his wife getting a job.

No one cares of it destroys a civilization, if there's a little money to be had along the way.

0

Women with a good degree are actually great. I have never seen clever code or anything super optimized from them, but sometimes that is what you want, instead of some confusing blur of code. I'd way rather work with an intelligent woman than a pajeet or chink. There are too many woman that claim "they can code" but only know html though, thankfully they sort themselves out, like the men who have a CS degree and can't write a for loop.

0

What stands out to me, is that these women are: young, childless, and a bit nerdy. For some people, that's fine.

Unfortunately, society is starting to punish women for not being that way.

0

Let's be honest: HTML is nigger-scribbles for women and niggers.

It's not "writing code". It's writing a love letter to a web browser and getting paid 90K/year for feeling good about it.

0

HTML is easy-peasy, but it's surprising how few people can do anything more than what was posted here.

0

I like working with HTML; it's fun. I like to think I have as much fun doing it as some faggot has while decorating. Definitely not coding, though. And anyone who only knows how to write markup is certainly not a coder. We should start calling them "website decorators".

0

Can you get me a 90k/year gig writing HTML? I'll write the best damn html they've ever seen, and I'll write more of it than anyone else can, too! Every company I work with gets HTML written by Indians that earn less than $10 an hour. Most people do not actually write HTML these days, it's all handled by templating languages or design software.

0

HTML is basically knitting

0

Beg to differ--knitting requires a lot more organization of different patterns and thus, mental awareness, than writing shitty html or dumbass CSS trash. Which is why most woman knitters don't design and layout their own knitting patterns but use other people's designs and layouts.

0

Who says girls can't knit?

0

Not to mention HTML isn't a programming language. It's a markup language.

0

Waht??? no Comic-Sans???

0

Now I get it... She took a snapshot on her phone, instead of using a screenshot and pasting that into Paint to save and maybe transfering the file to upload etc.

We've all done that before, especially when a sync cable wasn't handy. :/

0

and she managed to write bad html (which will get rendered since browsers expect bad html) and wrote some css but then threw a bunch of style info in the html tags, and she also doesn't have any real indentation system. I can handle when people do things differently, as long as they work, and they do them differently consistently, but this woman is just making a mess

0

If you don't want the whole desktop, you can just use Alt + PrintScreen and that will give you a clip of the active window. There's also the snipping tool.

0

I'm not sure whether women that actually pass their introductory cs or web design classes just don't feel a need to virtue signal, or no women pass their introductory cs or web design classes?

0

Unfortunately, everyone tells them to do that. It's enough to shut the whole thing down...

0

I don't say girls can't code.

But I suspect that this girl's code is missing a closing </h1> tag.

0

Just a case of copy and paste.. My haku.

0
0
0

copy and paste it into a free image editing software then crop it. it's what i do. pics of screens are so tacky ugh. if you wanna learn code, just do it. dont brag about how youre learning code while having a certain set of genitals. use that time n energy to git gud

0

CLS

'FOR n = 1 TO 70 'FOR h = 1 TO 1000 'NEXT h 'n$ = STR$(n) INPUT n$ DIM r$(1000) DIM c$(1000) DIM f$(5) DIM p$(1000) DATA 1,3,5,7,9 FOR i = 1 TO LEN(n$) r$(i) = MID$(n$, i, 1) NEXT i

l = 1 FOR i = 1 TO LEN(n$) a$ = MID$(r$(i), 1, l) a = VAL(a$) b = a \ 2 q = a \ 2 q1 = a / 2 q2 = q1 - q IF q2 <> 0 THEN r$(i + 1) = "1" + r$(i + 1): l = 2 IF q2 = 0 THEN l = 1 b$ = STR$(b) c$(i) = b$ NEXT i

t = 1 v$ = " " IF MID$(n$, 1, 1) = "1" THEN t = 2: v$ = v$ + " "

FOR i = t TO LEN(n$) y$ = y$ + c$(i) NEXT i FOR u = 1 TO 5 READ f$(u) 'IF MID$(n$, LEN(n$), 1) = "1" OR MID$(n$, LEN(n$), 1) = "3" OR MID$(n$, LEN(n$), 1) = "5" OR MID$(n$, LEN(n$), 1) = "7" OR MID$(n$, LEN(n$), 1) = "9" THEN y$ = y$ + ".5" IF MID$(n$, LEN(n$), 1) = f$(u) THEN y$ = y$ + ".5" NEXT u FOR i = 1 TO LEN(y$) w$ = MID$(y$, i, 1) IF w$ = " " THEN w$ = "" p$ = p$ + w$ 'COLOR 2: PRINT w$; NEXT i v$ = v$ + p$ PRINT "" PRINT v$ 'NEXT n 'GOTO 1

0

i think your formatting is fucked. i'm not going to decipher that without at least some line breaks

0

Nobody says that.

My wife is taking a c++ class , its a requirement for one semester ( shes not going into coding but its one semester required for her major) and shes doing decent, given that she doesnt really find it interesting. She is doing better at it than she thought .

0

Not saying they can't, but the title of this post is what she says in the first line (well, almost)

0

A Girl can achieve anything in the world. Check my own https://touchthestone.net/