Surely, you can beat Tanisha.

Well, she's supposedly got $45,000,000 in assets. So, that's a lot of cows.

But, if it makes you feel better, she's only worth 25 cows without the Jews giving her money.

But, go up to her and tell her she's worth 90,000 cows. I'm sure she'll be happy.

Pique.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pique

D

It's my go-to "Fuckin around and having fun" language.

Basically, it's C++ with the boost library built in and all the shit you hate about C++ removed.

Kek seriously D? What the heck is that for?

Not my numbers dude. I just googled Hillary Hotness and that's what came up.

Same with the fertility numbers. They aren't mine, they are just something I quickly looked up and plugged in.

If you have a better heuristic, stop complaining about it and do a commit.

If you factor in Jews and Muslims you need to drop the age of lost virginity to 6-9. Like it or not, they are part of the west now.

It's still a work in progress I can probably explain it better in code. But, basically, the calculation is supposed to be

of kids by your current husband minus the number of kids by former deadbeats.

So... Let's just say, Tanisha makes bad choices.

Ummm... I think you are taking this too seriously dude. Go take a couple shots of Vodka and come back when you want to joke around a bit.

"Getting laid" is pathetically easy.

Finding a wife to bear your children and raise them... that's the tricky part that white men are "complaining" about, because there are all sorts of systems working against those interests.

normalize shouldn't require any dependencies. It just normalizes a number based on a min and max value.

float normalize(float x, float min, float max){
    return (x < min || x > max) ? 0 : (x - min) / (max - min);
}

Hotness and skin color are separate scalars, so they have their own calculate functions. They modify the final value in calculate_value()

As for assigning the value 'black', there really isn't anything useful about that. But, an albedo value provides a useful and objective scalar value.

Why even need a program? Just ask your nearest Maasai. They should be able to give a pretty accurate number.

That's kind of the point of this project. To figure that out scientifically. There was a thread in /v/TraditionalWives yesterday about the "value" of a girl that sparked this question in my mind because that "value" was never properly defined.

So, if you want an answer, help me compile some statistics!

A quick Ctl+F shows you are missing height + weight for a BMI calculations. A 200lb land whale isn't worth much to a white man.

That's a good point. I'll have to think about it. The hotness scalar kind of covers that though and I don't want to have redundant scalars. So, I'd either have to keep the hotness variable or remove it in favor of a multitude of scalars which "hotness" would comprise of.

Speaking of, need a "from" perspective as well.

From, as in a location? Like, Africa or something? Try to make that into an objective scalar value and I'll see what I can do. But, "Africa" doesn't really translate into a scientific value we can do calculations on.

I guess what I'm trying to get at here is, despite this being a humorous project, there IS some sense of measurable reality here and I don't want the humorous aspect to get in the way of the real scientific value. Help me out with some of these heuristics and I'll add them in if they can work.

Any white man that fucks a widow is mentally fucked up, thats the earliest conception of cucking except the man was on the sky watching.

You say that as if the compiler gives a crap about lines of code. Sounds more like a "Chair -> Keyboard Interface" problem to me.

But, if you think you can do better without sacrificing readability or maintainability, go ahead and push the code. At best, you'll cut out maybe a dozen pointers.

It's easy to criticize, but I think I'd rather keep the maintainability.

Tell you what, I'll show you some cool tricks next time I commit. But the fact that you are even asking should be a warning to yourself that Dunning-Kuger is in play. Maybe read up on D language's feature set and see if you can figure it out before I commit.

↑I second this motion.

Ha! We think alike! That is what I'm working on today. Literally implementing the hot/crazy matrix into the program.

All these names already exist just look at Greek, Celt, Persian, Japanese, Indian folklore. After Apocalypse. These names may become common Worthapig, Aboutwohenz, Gudwife, WhiteNBrite, Nuggatowizdo, Twokows, Sikskamel, ToxicAidsdumpster, Donutouch, Witchwoman etc .

Hey, everyone! I found the SJW!

Basically, it's a way to model a problem by simplifying complex features. You won't get an accurate solution, but you'll get a "good enough" solution. Spherical Cow

The average value of a cow is ~$2400.

Yeah, but a calf goes for $500. Instead of complaining about it, why don't you commit something useful?

There's simply no way that a woman is worth more than six cows. Seven at most.

This calculates the optimal market value for a person. Which means, this isn't what you, or I or even the average person thinks this is worth. This calculates the optimal price someone, somewhere would be willing to pay for this person.

There's simply no way that a woman is worth more than six cows. Seven at most.

Instead of complaining submit a better heuristic.

Yeah, look, you're just not cut out for this "computers" thing. Consider something more suitable to your intellectual capacity, like gender studies, or suicide.

She has $45,000,000 in assets. That's a lot of cows. I mean, hell, I don't like Hillary either. But I'm not going to be autistic about it. She has cash, that translates to cows. If it makes you feel any better, if you take away all the Jew's money, she's only worth 25 cows.

People have value and that value can be converted into cattle.

Think of it this way, you go to work. At the end of the month, you get a paycheck. How many cattle can you buy with that money? Your value can be converted into cattle, and there are many facets by which we can determine which various positive traits are worth something.

The only person who could object to this reasoning is an SJW.

I have to trigger the autistic english majors somehow dude!

Yeah, I'll admit it's a silly project. But, when you are an economics geek, sometimes a stupid question pops in your head and you just want a stupid answer. And when you are a programmer you have no real excuse not to solve the stupid problem.

Tell ya what, Sweetheart. Make your own project and do better.

The code compiled. Who cares?